Skip to main content
Published Online:https://doi.org/10.3928/01477447-20100526-07Cited by:5

Abstract

The peripheral cortex of a vertebral body affected by Kümmell’s disease is not always intact, resulting in high risk for cement leakage. This study used modified techniques to avoid cement extravasation and dislodgment and investigated the feasibility and efficacy of kyphoplasty for treatment of Kümmell’s disease.

Between May 2006 and May 2008, 21 consecutive patients with Kümmell’s disease underwent kyphoplasty with modified techniques. Each patient was assessed preoperatively with standard examinations and imaged with dynamic radiographs, 3-dimensional computed tomography scans, and magnetic resonance imaging. A visual analog scale (VAS) and the Oswestry Disability Index were used to measure pain and disability pre- and postoperatively and at 6- and 12-month follow-up. One patient had cement leakage into the disk space but no clinical symptoms. There were no cases of cement dislodgment at follow-up. Comparison of the pre- vs postoperative VAS scores revealed significant differences (P<.05), whereas VAS scores at 6- vs 12-month follow-up were similar. The Oswestry Disability Index scores varied from 62.3%±15.1% preoperatively to 35.2%±12.1% postoperatively (P<.05). This improvement in scores was still present at 6- and 12-month follow-up. At 6- and 12-month follow-up, maintenance of height restoration and kyphotic deformity correction was found.

Kyphoplasty may be a relatively safe and effective method for treatment of Kümmell’s disease when modified techniques are used to prevent cement leakage and dislodgment.

  • 1.Steel HH. Kümmell’s disease. Am J Surg. 1951; 81(2):161–167.10.1016/0002-9610(51)90206-1

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 2.Benedek TG, Nicholas JJ. Delayed traumatic vertebral body compression fracture; II: pathologic features. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 1981; 10(4):271–277.10.1016/0049-0172(81)90004-4

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 3.Jang JS, Kim DY, Lee SH. Efficacy of percutaneous vertebroplasty in the treatment of intravertebral pseudarthrosis associated with noninfected avascular necrosis of the vertebral body. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003; 28(14):1588–1592.

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 4.Maheshwari PR, Nagar AM, Prasad SS, Shah JR, Patkar DP. Avascular necrosis of spine: a rare appearance. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2004; 29(6):E119–122.

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 5.McKiernan F, Faciszewski T. Intravertebral clefts in osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures. Arthritis Rheum. 2003; 48(5):1414–1419.10.1002/art.10984

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 6.Stallenberg B, Madani A, Burny F, Gevenois PA. The vacuum phenomenon: a CT sign of nonunited fracture. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2001; 176(5):1161–1164.

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 7.Libicher M, Appelt A, Berger I, et al.The intravertebral vacuum phenomen as specific sign of osteonecrosis in vertebral compression fractures: results from a radiological and histological study. Eur Radiol. 2007; 17(9):2248–2252.10.1007/s00330-007-0684-0

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 8.Wiggins MC, Sehizadeh M, Pilgram TK, Gilula LA. Importance of intravertebral fracture clefts in vertebroplasty outcome. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007; 188(3):634–640.10.2214/AJR.06.0542

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 9.Chen LH, Lai PL, Chen WJ. Unipedicle percutaneous vertebroplasty for spinal intraosseous vacuum cleft. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005; (435):148–153.10.1097/01.blo.0000155346.12405.70

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 10.Kim DY, Lee SH, Jang JS, Chung SK, Lee HY. Intravertebral vacuum phenomenon in osteoporotic compression fracture: report of 67 cases with quantitative evaluation of intravertebral instability. J Neurosurg. 2004; 100(1 Suppl Spine):24–31.

    MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 11.Peh WC, Gelbart MS, Gilula LA, Peck DD. Percutaneous vertebroplasty: treatment of painful vertebral compression fractures with intraosseous vacuum phenomena. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2003; 180(5):1411–1417.

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 12.Grohs JG, Matzner M, Trieb K, Krepler P. Treatment of intravertebral pseudarthroses by balloon kyphoplasty. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2006; 19(8):560–565.10.1097/01.bsd.0000211232.91340.6b

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 13.Wagner AL, Baskurt E. Refracture with cement extrusion following percutaneous vertebroplasty of a large interbody cleft. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2006; 27(1):230–231.

    MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 14.Tsai TT, Chen WJ, Lai PL, et al.Polymethylmethacrylate cement dislodgment following percutaneous vertebroplasty: a case report. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003; 28(22): E457–460.

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 15.Lieberman IH, Dudeney S, Reinhardt MK, Bell G. Initial outcome and efficacy of “kyphoplasty” in the treatment of painful osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2001; 26(14):1631–1638.

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 16.Yang HL, Wang GL, Niu GQ, et al.Using MRI to determine painful vertebrae to be treated by kyphoplasty in multiple-level vertebral compression fractures: a prospective study. J Int Med Res. 2008; 36(5):1056–1063.

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 17.Zou J, Mei X, Gan M, Wang G, Lu J, Yang H. Is kyphoplasty reliable for osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture with vertebral wall deficiency?Injury. 2010; 41(4):360–364.10.1016/j.injury.2009.09.033

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 18.McKiernan F, Jensen R, Faciszewski T. The dynamic mobility of vertebral compression fractures. J Bone Miner Res. 2003; 18(1):24–29.10.1359/jbmr.2003.18.1.24

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 19.Jensen ME, Evans AJ, Mathis JM, Kallmes DF, Cloft HJ, Dion JE. Percutaneous polymethylmethacrylate vertebroplasty in the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral body compression fractures: technical aspects. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1997; 18(10):1897–1904.

    MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 20.Hulme PA, Krebs J, Ferguson SJ, Berlemann U. Vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty: a systematic review of 69 clinical studies. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006; 31(17):1983–2001.

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 21.Hadjipavlou AG, Tzermiadianos MN, Katonis PG, Szpalski M. Percutaneous vertebroplasty and balloon kyphoplasty for the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures and osteolytic tumours. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2005; 87(12):1595–1604.10.1302/0301-620X.87B12.16074

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 22.Phillips FM, Todd Wetzel F, Lieberman I, Campbell-Hupp M. An in vivo comparison of the potential for extravertebral cement leak after vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2002; 27(19):2173–2179.

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 23.Krause WR, Krug W, Miller J. Strength of the cement-bone interface. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1982; (163):290–299.

    MedlineGoogle Scholar

We use cookies on this site to enhance your user experience. For a complete overview of all the cookies used, please see our privacy policy.

×