Skip to main content
Published Online:https://doi.org/10.3928/01477447-20121120-03Cited by:12

Abstract

This study assessed the accuracy of preoperative digital templating for a second-generation cementless stem compared with its first-generation design. A prospective cohort of 100 consecutive patients who had undergone a primary total hip arthroplasty using a new second-generation cementless stem was compared with the prior 100 hips that had received the first-generation stem. The authors believe that the second-generation stem may allow equal or more accurate digital templating compared with its predicate design.

  • 1.Hsu AR, Kim JD, Bhatia S, Levine BR. Effect of training level on accuracy of digital templating in primary total hip and knee arthroplasty. Orthopedics. 2012; 35(2):e179–e183.

    LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 2.Bozic KJ, Kurtz S, Lau E, et al.The epidemiology of bearing surface usage in total hip arthroplasty in the United States. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009; 91(7):1614–1620.10.2106/JBJS.H.01220

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 3.Polkowski GG, Callaghan JJ, Mont MA, Clohisy JC. Total hip arthroplasty in the very young patient. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2012; 20(8):487–497.10.5435/JAAOS-20-08-487

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 4.Costa CR, Johnson AJ, Naziri Q, Mont MA. Review of total hip resurfacing and total hip arthroplasty in young patients who had Legg-Calve-Perthes disease. Orthop Clin North Am. 2011; 42(3):419–422.10.1016/j.ocl.2011.04.002

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 5.Huo MH, Dumont GD, Knight JR, Mont MA. What’s new in total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011; 93(20):1944–1950.10.2106/JBJS.K.00656

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 6.Marulanda GA, Minniti CP, Ulrich SD, Seyler TM, Mont MA. Perioperative management for orthopaedic patients with sickle cell anaemia. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2009; 17(3):346–350.

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 7.Johannson HR, Zywiel MG, Marker DR, Jones LC, McGrath MS, Mont MA. Osteonecrosis is not a predictor of poor outcomes in primary total hip arthroplasty: a systematic literature review. Int Orthop. 2011; 35(4):465–473.10.1007/s00264-010-0979-7

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 8.Seyler TM, Cui Q, Mihalko WM, Mont MA, Saleh KJ. Advances in hip arthroplasty in the treatment of osteonecrosis. Instr Course Lect. 2007; 56:221–233.

    MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 9.Tornero E, Garcia S, Larrousse M, et al.Total hip arthroplasty in HIV-infected patients: a retrospective, controlled study. HIV Med. 2012; 13(10):623–629.10.1111/j.1468-1293.2012.01017.x

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 10.Pivec R, Johnson AJ, Mont MA. Results of total hip arthroplasty in patients who have rapidly progressive hip disease: a systematic review of the literature. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2012; 9(3):257–262.10.1586/erd.12.12

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 11.Iorio R, Siegel J, Specht LM, Tilzey JF, Hartman A, Healy WL. A comparison of acetate vs digital templating for preoperative planning of total hip arthroplasty: is digital templating accurate and safe?J Arthroplasty. 2009; 24(2):175–179.10.1016/j.arth.2007.11.019

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 12.The B, Verdonschot N, van Horn JR, van Ooijen PM, Diercks RL. Digital versus analogue preoperative planning of total hip arthroplasties: a randomized clinical trial of 210 total hip arthroplasties. J Arthroplasty. 2007; 22(6):866–870.10.1016/j.arth.2006.07.013

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 13.Specht LM, Levitz S, Iorio R, Healy WL, Tilzey JF. A comparison of acetate and digital templating for total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007; 464:179–183.

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 14.Sariali E, Mauprivez R, Khiami F, Pascal-Mousselard H, Catonne Y. Accuracy of the preoperative planning for cementless total hip arthroplasty. A randomised comparison between three-dimensional computerised planning and conventional templating. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2012; 98(2):151–158.10.1016/j.otsr.2011.09.023

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 15.Shaarani SR, McHugh G, Collins DA. Accuracy of digital preoperative templating in 100 consecutive uncemented total hip arthroplasties: a single surgeon series. J Arthroplasty. [Published online ahead of print July 30, 2012.]

    Google Scholar
  • 16.Steinberg EL, Shasha N, Menahem A, Dekel S. Preoperative planning of total hip replacement using the TraumaCad system. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2010; 130(12):1429–1432.10.1007/s00402-010-1046-y

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 17.Suh KT, Cheon SJ, Kim DW. Comparison of preoperative templating with postoperative assessment in cementless total hip arthroplasty. Acta Orthop Scand. 2004; 75(1):40–44.10.1080/00016470410001708070

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 18.Unnanuntana A, Wagner D, Goodman SB. The accuracy of preoperative templating in cementless total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2009; 24(2):180–186.10.1016/j.arth.2007.10.032

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 19.Viceconti M, Lattanzi R, Antonietti B, et al.CT-based surgical planning software improves the accuracy of total hip replacement preoperative planning. Med Eng Phys. 2003; 25(5):371–377.10.1016/S1350-4533(03)00018-3

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 20.Wedemeyer C, Quitmann H, Xu J, Heep H, von Knoch M, Saxler G. Digital templating in total hip arthroplasty with the Mayo stem. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2008; 128(10):1023–1029.10.1007/s00402-007-0494-5

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 21.Whiddon DR, Bono JV. Digital templating in total hip arthroplasty. Instr Course Lect. 2008; 57:273–279.

    MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 22.Noble PC, Sugano N, Johnston JD, et al.Computer simulation: how can it help the surgeon optimize implant position?Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003; (417):242–252.

    MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 23.Schmidutz F, Steinbruck A, Wanke-Jellinek L, Pietschmann M, Jansson V, Fottner A. The accuracy of digital templating: a comparison of short-stem total hip arthroplasty and conventional total hip arthroplasty. Int Orthop. 2012; 36(9):1767–1772.10.1007/s00264-012-1532-7

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 24.Schropp L, Stavropoulos A, Gotfredsen E, Wenzel A. Calibration of radiographs by a reference metal ball affects preoperative selection of implant size. Clin Oral Investig. 2009; 13(4):375–381.10.1007/s00784-009-0257-5

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 25.Wuestemann T, Bastian A, Schmidt W, et al.A novel technique for studying proximal femoral bone morphology for hip implant design. Paper presented at: 11th EFORT Congress; June 2–5, 2010; Madrid, Spain.

    Google Scholar
  • 26.Ku PG, Kirmani SJ, Humberg H, Kavarthapu V, Li P. Reproducibility and accuracy of templating uncemented THA with digital radiographic and digital TraumaCad templating software. Orthopedics. 2009; 32(11):815.

    MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 27.Muller ME. Lessons of 30 years of total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1992; (274):12–21.

    MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 28.Dore DD, Rubash HE. Primary total hip arthroplasty in the older patient: optimizing the results. Instr Course Lect. 1994; 43:347–357.

    MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 29.Blackley HR, Howell GE, Rorabeck CH. Planning and management of the difficult primary hip replacement: preoperative planning and technical considerations. Instr Course Lect. 2000; 49:3–11.

    MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 30.Eggli S, Pisan M, Muller ME. The value of preoperative planning for total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1998; 80(3):382–390.10.1302/0301-620X.80B3.7764

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 31.Haddad FS, Masri BA, Garbuz DS, Duncan CP. The prevention of periprosthetic fractures in total hip and knee arthroplasty. Orthop Clin North Am. 1999; 30(2):191–207.10.1016/S0030-5898(05)70074-2

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 32.Goldstein WM, Gordon A, Branson JJ. Leg length inequality in total hip arthroplasty. Orthopedics. 2005; 28(9 suppl):s1037–s1040.

    AbstractGoogle Scholar
  • 33.Müller ME. Total hip replacement: planning, technique and complications. In: , Cruess RL, Mitchell NS, eds. Surgical Management of Degenerative Arthritis of the Lower Limb. Philadelphia, PA: Lea and Faber; 1975:90–113.

    Google Scholar
  • 34.Charnley J. Low Friction Arthroplasty of the Hip. Berlin, Germany: Springer Verlag; 1979:246.

    Google Scholar
  • 35.Carter LW, Stovall DO, Young TR. Determination of accuracy of preoperative templating of noncemented femoral prostheses. J Arthroplasty. 1995; 10(4):507–513.10.1016/S0883-5403(05)80153-6

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 36.Davila JA, Kransdorf MJ, Duffy GP. Surgical planning of total hip arthroplasty: accuracy of computer-assisted EndoMap software in predicting component size. Skeletal Radiol. 2006; 35(6):390–393.10.1007/s00256-006-0106-4

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 37.González Della Valle A, Comba F, Taveras N, Salvati EA. The utility and precision of analogue and digital preoperative planning for total hip arthroplasty. Int Orthop. 2008; 32(3):289–294.10.1007/s00264-006-0317-2

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 38.Crooijmans HJ, Laumen AM, van Pul C, van Mourik JB. A new digital preoperative planning method for total hip arthroplasties. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009; 467(4):909–916.10.1007/s11999-008-0486-y

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 39.Levine B, Fabi D, Deirmengian C. Digital templating in primary total hip and knee arthroplasty. Orthopedics. 2010; 33(11):797.

    LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 40.Gamble P, de Beer J, Petruccelli D, Winemaker M. The accuracy of digital templating in uncemented total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2010; 25(4):529–532.10.1016/j.arth.2009.04.011

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 41.Efe T, El Zayat BF, Heyse TJ, Timmesfeld N, Fuchs-Winkelmann S, Schmitt J. Precision of preoperative digital templating in total hip arthroplasty. Acta Orthop Belg. 2011; 77(5):616–621.

    MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 42.Bertz A, Indrekvam K, Ahmed M, Englund E, Sayed-Noor AS. Validity and reliability of preoperative templating in total hip arthroplasty using a digital templating system. Skeletal Radiol. 2012; 41(10):1245–1249.10.1007/s00256-012-1431-4

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 43.Kosashvili Y, Shasha N, Olschewski E, et al.Digital versus conventional templating techniques in preoperative planning for total hip arthroplasty. Can J Surg. 2009; 52(1):6–11.

    MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 44.Mittag F, Ipach I, Schaefer R, Meisner C, Leichtle U. Predictive value of preoperative digital templating in THA depends on the surgical experience of the performing physician. Orthopedics. 2012; 35(2):e144–e147.

    LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 45.Casper DS, Kim GK, Restrepo C, Parvizi J, Rothman RH. Primary total hip arthroplasty with an uncemented femoral component five- to nine-year results. J Arthroplasty. 2011; 26(6):838–841.10.1016/j.arth.2011.02.010

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 46.Costa CR, Johnson AJ, Mont MA. Use of cementless, tapered femoral stems in patients who have a mean age of 20 years. J Arthroplasty. 2012; 27(4):497–502.10.1016/j.arth.2011.07.005

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

We use cookies on this site to enhance your user experience. For a complete overview of all the cookies used, please see our privacy policy.

×