Setting Patients’ Expectations for Range of Motion After Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair
Abstract
Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair is a reliable option for symptomatic patients who have failed conservative treatments. Limited evidence exists regarding early rehabilitation time points (less than 1 year) and the influence of tear size. The authors sought to determine whether a difference exists in pre- and postoperative range of motion among small, medium, and large isolated rotator cuff tears treated arthroscopically.
Patient- and tear-specific demographics were analyzed in a retrospective series of patients who had undergone arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Two hundred seventy-four patients (153 [56%] men and 121 [44%] women; mean age, 53 years) were analyzed. Small tears (n=158 [58%]) were more common than medium (n=70 [25%]) and large (n=46 [17%]) tears. Shoulder range of motion was measured preoperatively and at 2 and 6 weeks, 3 and 6 months, and 1 year postoperatively. At nearly all time points pre- and postoperatively, large tears were significantly stiffer than small tears in external rotation and forward elevation (P<.05). It takes 1 year to fully regain external rotation after small and medium tears, whereas mild residual stiffness remains after large tears. Full forward elevation is restored by 3 months for small tears vs 6 months for medium and large tears.
Significant tear size–dependent differences exist in shoulder range of motion after arthroscopic repair of isolated rotator cuff tears. These data can be used to manage patients’ expectations for range of motion after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair to improve patient satisfaction.
- 1.Mancuso CA, Sculco TP, Wickiewicz TL, Patients’ expectations of knee surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001; 83(7):1005–1012. Crossref Medline, Google Scholar
- 2.Iversen MD, Daltroy LH, Fossel AH, Katz JN. The prognostic importance of patient pre-operative expectations of surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis. Patient Educ Couns. 1998; 34(2):169–178.
10.1016/S0738-3991(97)00109-2 Crossref Medline, Google Scholar - 3.Mahomed NN, Liang MH, Cook EF, The importance of patient expectations in predicting functional outcomes after total joint arthroplasty. J Rheumatol. 2002; 29(6):1273–1279. Medline, Google Scholar
- 4.Mancuso CA, Altchek DW, Craig EV, Patients’ expectations of shoulder surgery. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2002; 11(6):541–549.
10.1067/mse.2002.126764 Crossref Medline, Google Scholar - 5.Mancuso CA, Salvati EA, Johanson NA, Peterson MG, Charlson ME. Patients’ expectations and satisfaction with total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 1997; 12(4):387–396.
10.1016/S0883-5403(97)90194-7 Crossref Medline, Google Scholar - 6.Henn RF, Kang L, Tashjian RZ, Green A. Patients’ preoperative expectations predict the outcome of rotator cuff repair. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007; 89(9):1913–1919.
10.2106/JBJS.F.00358 Crossref Medline, Google Scholar - 7.CMS. Hospital Care Quality Information from the Consumer Perspective. 2012; www.hcahpsonline.org. Accessed May 6, 2012. Google Scholar
- 8.Trenerry K, Walton JR, Murrell GA. Prevention of shoulder stiffness after rotator cuff repair. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005; (430):94–99.
10.1097/01.blo.0000137564.27841.27 Crossref Medline, Google Scholar - 9.Brislin KJ, Field LD, Savoie FH. Complications after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Arthroscopy. 2007; 23(2):124–128.
10.1016/j.arthro.2006.09.001 Crossref Medline, Google Scholar - 10.Huberty DP, Schoolfield JD, Brady PC, Vadala AP, Arrigoni P, Burkhart SS. Incidence and treatment of postoperative stiffness following arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Arthroscopy. 2009; 25(8):880–890.
10.1016/j.arthro.2009.01.018 Crossref Medline, Google Scholar - 11.Parsons BO, Gruson KI, Chen DD, Harrison AK, Gladstone J, Flatow EL. Does slower rehabilitation after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair lead to long-term stiffness?J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2010; 19(7):1034–1039.
10.1016/j.jse.2010.04.006 Crossref Medline, Google Scholar - 12.Curtis AS, Snyder S, Del Pizzo W, Friedman MJ, Ferkel RD, Karzel RP. Complications of shoulder arthroscopy. Arthroscopy. 1992; 8:395.
10.1016/0749-8063(92)90080-U Crossref, Google Scholar - 13.Berjano P, Gonzalez BG, Olmedo JF, Perez-Espana LA, Munilla MG. Complications in arthroscopic shoulder surgery. Arthroscopy. 1998; 14(8):785–788.
10.1016/S0749-8063(98)70011-8 Crossref Medline, Google Scholar - 14.Tauro JC. Stiffness and rotator cuff tears: incidence, arthroscopic findings, and treatment results. Arthroscopy. 2006; 22(6):581–586.
10.1016/j.arthro.2006.03.004 Crossref Medline, Google Scholar - 15.Denard PJ, Ladermann A, Burkhart SS. Prevention and management of stiffness after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: systematic review and implications for rotator cuff healing. Arthroscopy. 2011; 27(6):842–848.
10.1016/j.arthro.2011.01.013 Crossref Medline, Google Scholar - 16.DeOrio JK, Cofield RH. Results of a second attempt at surgical repair of a failed initial rotator-cuff repair. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1984; 66(4):563–567. Crossref Medline, Google Scholar
- 17.Kluger R, Bock P, Mittlbock M, Krampla W, Engel A. Long-term survivorship of rotator cuff repairs using ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging analysis. Am J Sports Med. 2011; 39(10):2071–2081.
10.1177/0363546511406395 Crossref Medline, Google Scholar - 18.Miller BS, Downie BK, Kohen RB, When do rotator cuff repairs fail? Serial ultrasound examination after arthroscopic repair of large and massive rotator cuff tears. Am J Sports Med. 2011; 39(10):2064–2070.
10.1177/0363546511413372 Crossref Medline, Google Scholar - 19.Khazzam M, Kuhn JE, Mulligan E, Magnetic resonance imaging identification of rotator cuff retears after repair: interobserver and intraobserver agreement. Am J Sports Med. 2012; 40(8):1722–1727.
10.1177/0363546512449424 Crossref Medline, Google Scholar
