Skip to main content
Published Online:https://doi.org/10.3928/01477447-20130624-12Cited by:13

Abstract

Acetabular fractures can be classified into 5 simple and 5 associated fracture patterns. A significant amount of variation and complexity exists in these fractures patterns. Fractures of the posterior wall are the most common acetabular fractures. Comminution of the quadrilateral plate adds to fracture instability, and more rigid and stable internal fixation is mandatory. The goal of this study was to assess the results of reconstruction of comminuted posterior wall fractures of the acetabulum associated with quadrilateral plate fractures using the tension band technique.

Twelve patients (9 men and 3 women) were included in the study. Mean patient age was 38.6 years (range, 24–47 years). Minimum follow-up was more than 2 years postoperatively. Reconstruction of the fracture included anatomic reduction of the fracture and fixation with a buttress plate for the posterior column and a prebent one-third tubular plate for the quadrilateral plate fracture. Clinical results were excellent in 58% of patients and good in 17% of patients. Radiologic results were excellent in 50% of patients and good in 17% of patients. Radiologically, based on the fracture gap postoperatively, 8 (66%) patients showed anatomic reduction, 2 (17%) showed good reduction, and 2 (17%) showed poor reduction.

The study confirms that this method of reconstruction facilitates accurate and firm reduction of displaced posterior wall fractures of the acetabulum.

  • 1.Letournel E. Acetabular fractures: classification and treatment. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1980; 151:81–106.

    Google Scholar
  • 2.Letournel E. The treatment of acetabular fractures through the ilioinguinal approach. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1993; 292:62–76.

    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 3.Letournel E. Fractures of the acetabulum: a study of a series of 75 cases. J Orthop Trauma. 2006; 20:S15–S19.

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 4.Matta JM. Operative treatment of acetabular fractures through the ilioinguinal approach: a 10-year perspective. J Orthop Trauma. 2006; 20:S20–S29.

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 5.Mayo K. Open reduction and internal fixation of fractures of the acetabulum: results in 163 fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1994; 305:31–3710.1097/00003086-199408000-00005.

    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 6.Brumback RJ, Holt ES, McBride MS, Poka A, Bathon GH, Burgess AR. Acetabular depression fracture accompanying posterior fracture dislocation of the hip. J Orthop Trauma. 1990; 41:42–4810.1097/00005131-199003000-00008.

    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 7.Werner CM, Copeland CE, Ruckstuhl T, Stromberg J, Turen CH, Bouaicha S. Acetabular fracture types vary with different acetabular version. Int Orthop. 2012; 36:2559–256310.1007/s00264-012-1687-2.

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 8.Moed BR, Dickson KF, Kregor PJ, Reilly MC, Vrahas MS. The surgical treatment of acetabular fractures. Instr Course Lect. 2010; 59:481–501.

    MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 9.Kim HT, Ahn JM, Hur JO, Lee JS, Cheon SJ. Reconstruction of acetabular posterior wall fractures. Clin Orthop Surg. 2011; 3:114–12010.4055/cios.2011.3.2.114.

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 10.D’aubigne RM, Postel M. Functional results of hip arthroplasty with acrylic prosthesis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009; 467:7–2710.1007/s11999-008-0572-1.

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 11.Dakin GJ, Eberhardt AW, Alonso JE, Stannard JP, Mann KA. Acetabular fracture patterns: associations with motor vehicle crash information. J Trauma. 1999; 47:1063–107110.1097/00005373-199912000-00012.

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 12.Cole JD, Bolhofner BR. Acetabular fracture fixation via a modified Stoppa limited intrapelvic approach. Description of operative technique and preliminary treatment results. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1994; 305:112–12310.1097/00003086-199408000-00015.

    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 13.Ponsen KJ, Joosse P, Schigt A, Goslings JC, Luitse JS. Internal fracture fixation using the Stoppa approach in pelvic ring and acetabular fractures: technical aspects and operative results. J Trauma. 2006; 61:662–66710.1097/01.ta.0000219693.95873.24.

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 14.Crowl AC, Kahler DM. Closed reduction and percutaneous fixation of anterior column acetabular fractures. Comput Aided Surg. 2002; 7:169–17810.3109/10929080209146027.

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 15.Gross T, Jacob AL, Messmer P, Regazzoni P, Steinbrich W, Huegli RW. Transverse acetabular fracture: hybrid minimal access and percutaneous CT-navigated fixation. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2004; 183:1000–100210.2214/ajr.183.4.1831000.

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 16.Giannoudis PV, Tzioupis CC, Pape HC, Roberts CS. Percutaneous fixation of the pelvic ring: an update. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2007; 89:145–154.

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 17.Rommens PM. Is there a role for percutaneous pelvic and acetabular reconstruction?Injury. 2007; 38:463–47710.1016/j.injury.2007.01.025.

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 18.Fornaro J, Keel M, Harders M, Marincek B, Székely G, Frauenfelder T. An interactive surgical planning tool for acetabular fractures: initial results. J Orthop Surg Res. 2010; 5:5010.1186/1749-799X-5-50.

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 19.Saterbak AM, Marsh JL, Nepola JV, Brandser EA, Turbett T. Clinical failure after posterior wall acetabular fractures: the influence of initial fracture patterns. J Orthop Trauma. 2000; 14:230–23710.1097/00005131-200005000-00002.

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 20.Chiu FY, Lo WH, Chen TH, Chen CM, Huang CK, Ma HL. Fractures of posterior wall of acetabulum. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 1996; 115:273–27510.1007/BF00439052.

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 21.Moed BR, McMichael JC. Outcomes of posterior wall fractures of the acetabulum. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007; 89:1170–117610.2106/JBJS.F.00473.

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 22.Pantazopoulos T, Nicolopoulos CS, Babis GC, Theodoropoulos T. Surgical treatment of acetabular posterior wall fractures. Injury. 1993; 24:319–32310.1016/0020-1383(93)90055-B.

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 23.Giannoudis PV, Grotz MR, Papakostidis C, Dinopoulos H. Operative treatment of displaced fractures of the acetabulum. A meta-analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2005; 87:2–9.

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 24.Laflamme GY, Delisle J, Leduc S, Uzel PA. Isolated quadrilateral plate fracture: an unusual acetabular fracture. Can J Surg. 2009; 52:E217–E219.

    MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 25.Ruesch PD, Holdener H, Ciaramitaro M, Mast JW. A prospective study of surgically treated acetabular fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1994; 305:38–4610.1097/00003086-199408000-00006.

    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 26.Richter H, Hutson JJ, Zych G. The use of spring plates in the internal fixation of acetabular fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 2004; 18:179–18110.1097/00005131-200403000-00010.

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 27.Ebraheim N, Patil V, Liu J, Sanford C, Haman S. Reconstruction of comminuted posterior wall fractures using the buttress technique: a review of 32 fractures. Int Orthop. 2007; 31:671–67510.1007/s00264-006-0246-0.

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 28.Goulet JA, Rouleau JP, Mason DJ, Goldstein SA. Comminuted fractures of the posterior wall of the acetabulum: a biomechanical evaluation of fixate on methods. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1994; 7:1457–1463.

    CrossrefGoogle Scholar

We use cookies on this site to enhance your user experience. For a complete overview of all the cookies used, please see our privacy policy.

×