Biomechanical Comparison of Axial Load Between Cannulated Locking Screws and Noncannulated Cortical Locking Screws
Abstract
The goal of this study was to compare the biomechanical stability of cannulated locking screws and noncannulated cortical locking screws in a periarticular locking plate. Twelve fresh-frozen porcine tibias with a 1-cm gap created distal to the tibial plateau were used to simulate an unstable proximal tibial fracture. All specimens were fixed with a periarticular proximal lateral tibial locking plate and divided into 2 groups based on whether the proximal metaphyseal screw holes of the plate were inserted with either cannulated locking screws or noncannulated cortical locking screws.
An axial compressive load was applied to cause failure in each specimen using a materials testing instrument. The axial stiffness and maximum failure strength in axial loading were recorded. Axial stiffness of the constructs using noncannulated cortical locking screw was significantly higher than that of the constructs using cannulated locking screws (P=.006). Axial failure strength of the constructs using noncannulated cortical locking screw was significantly higher than that of the constructs using cannulated locking screws (P=.002). The failure mode observed in all specimens was a permanent screw-bending deformity over the head-shaft junction of proximal metaphyseal screws, irrespective of whether they were cannulated or noncannulated cortical locking screws.
Fixation with noncannulated cortical locking screws offered more stability than cannulated locking screws with regard to axial stiffness and failure strength in a porcine model with unstable proximal tibial fractures.
- 1.Catagni MA, Ottaviani G, Maggioni M. Treatment strategies for complex fractures of the tibial plateau with external circular fixation and limited internal fixation. J Trauma. 2007; 63(5):1043–1053.
10.1097/TA.0b013e3181238d88 > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar - 2.El Barbary H, Abdel Ghani H, Misbah H, Salem K. Complex tibial plateau fractures treated with Ilizarov external fixator with or without minimal internal fixation. Int Orthop. 2005; 29(3):182–185.
10.1007/s00264-005-0638-6 > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar - 3.Kumar A, Whittle AP. Treatment of complex (Schatzker Type VI) fractures of the tibial plateau with circular wire external fixation: retrospective case review. J Orthop Trauma. 2000; 14(5):339–344.
10.1097/00005131-200006000-00006 > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar - 4.Spagnolo R, Pace F. Management of the Schatzker VI fractures with lateral locked screw plating. Musculoskelet Surg. 2012; 96(2):75–80.
10.1007/s12306-011-0173-0 > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar - 5.Goesling T, Frenk A, Appenzeller A, Garapati R, Marti A, Krettek C. LISS PLT: design, mechanical and biomechanical characteristics. Injury. 2003; 34(suppl 1):11–15.
10.1016/S0020-1383(03)00253-5 > CrossrefGoogle Scholar - 6.Stoffel K, Dieter U, Stachowiak G, Gachter A, Kuster MS. Biomechanical testing of the LCP—how can stability in locked internal fixators be controlled?Injury. 2003; 34(suppl 2):11–19.
10.1016/j.injury.2003.09.021 > CrossrefGoogle Scholar - 7.Trease C, McIff T, Toby EB. Locking versus nonlocking T-plates for dorsal and volar fixation of dorsally comminuted distal radius fractures: a biomechanical study. J Hand Surg Am. 2005; 30(4):756–763.
10.1016/j.jhsa.2005.04.017 > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar - 8.Gausepohl T, Mohring R, Pennig D, Koebke J. Fine thread versus coarse thread. A comparison of the maximum holding power. Injury. 2001; 32(suppl 4):1–7.
10.1016/S0020-1383(01)00168-1 > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar - 9.Zimmer Trauma. Surgical technique—Zimmer periarticular proximal lateral tibial locking plate. Warsaw, IN: Zimmer; 2005. > Google Scholar
- 10.Chapman JR, Harrington RM, Lee KM, Anderson PA, Tencer AF, Kowalski D. Factors affecting the pullout strength of cancellous bone screws. J Biomech Eng. 1996; 118(3):391–398.
10.1115/1.2796022 > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar - 11.Collinge CA, Stern S, Cordes S, Lautenschlager EP. Mechanical properties of small fragment screws. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2000; (373):277–284.
10.1097/00003086-200004000-00034 > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar - 12.Hearn TC, Schatzker J, Wolfson N. Extraction strength of cannulated cancellous bone screws. J Orthop Trauma. 1993; 7(2):138–141.
10.1097/00005131-199304000-00006 > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar - 13.Ali AM, El-Shafie M, Willett KM. Failure of fixation of tibial plateau fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 2002; 16(5):323–329.
10.1097/00005131-200205000-00006 > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar - 14.Brandt E, Verdonschot N. Biomechanical analysis of the sliding hip screw, cannulated screws and Targon1 FN in intracapsular hip fractures in cadaver femora. Injury. 2011; 42(2):183–187.
10.1016/j.injury.2010.08.021 > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar - 15.Ramaswamy R, Evans S, Kosashvili Y. Holding power of variable pitch screws in osteoporotic, osteopenic and normal bone: are all screws created equal?Injury. 2010; 41(2):179–183.
10.1016/j.injury.2009.08.015 > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar - 16.Thompson JD, Benjamin JB, Szivek JA. Pullout strengths of cannulated and noncannulated cancellous bone screws. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1997; (341):241–249. > MedlineGoogle Scholar
- 17.Johnson NL, Galuppo LD, Stover SM, Taylor KT. An in vitro biomechanical comparison of the insertion variables and pullout mechanical properties of AO 6.5-mm standard cancellous and 7.3-mm self-tapping, cannulated bone screws in foal femoral bone. Vet Surg. 2004; 33(6):681–690.
10.1111/j.1532-950x.2004.04093.x > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
