Skip to main content
Orthopedics, 2014;37(11):751–757
Published Online:https://doi.org/10.3928/01477447-20141023-05Cited by:70

Abstract

The authors describe the first surgical case adopting the combination of real-time augmented reality and wearable computing devices such as Google Glass (Google Inc, Mountain View, California). A 66-year-old man presented to their institution for a total shoulder replacement after 5 years of progressive right shoulder pain and decreased range of motion. Throughout the surgical procedure, Google Glass was integrated with the Virtual Interactive Presence and Augmented Reality system (University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama), enabling the local surgeon to interact with the remote surgeon within the local surgical field. Surgery was well tolerated by the patient and early surgical results were encouraging, with an improvement of shoulder pain and greater range of motion. The combination of real-time augmented reality and wearable computing devices such as Google Glass holds much promise in the field of surgery. [Orthopedics. 2014; 37(11):751–757.]

  • 1.Gawande A. Two hundred years of surgery. N Engl J Med. 2012; 366(18):1716–1723.10.1056/NEJMra1202392

    > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 2.Cosman PH, Shearer CJ, Hugh TJ, Biankin AV, Merrett ND. A novel approach to high definition, high-contrast video capture in abdominal surgery. Ann Surg. 2007; 245(4):533–535.10.1097/01.sla.0000250441.69758.cd

    > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 3.Maeso S, Reza M, Mayol JA, et al.Efficacy of the Da Vinci surgical system in abdominal surgery compared with that of laparoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg. 2010; 252(2):254–262.10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181e6239e

    > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 4.Nguyen NT, Hinojosa MW, Finley D, Stevens M, Paya M. Application of robotics in general surgery: initial experience. Am Surg. 2004; 70(10):914–917.

    > MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 5.Joseph B, Hadeed G, Sadoun M, Rhee PM, Weinstein RS. Video consultation for trauma and emergency surgical patients. Crit Care Nurs Q. 2012; 35(4):341–345.10.1097/CNQ.0b013e318266c2f2

    > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 6.Lewis ER, Thomas CA, Wilson ML, Mbarika VW. Telemedicine in acute-phase injury management: a review of practice and advancements. Telemed J E Health. 2012; 18(6):434–445.10.1089/tmj.2011.0199

    > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 7.Shenai MB, Dillavou M, Shum C, et al.Virtual interactive presence and augmented reality (VIPAR) for remote surgical assistance. Neurosurgery. 2011; 68(1 suppl):200–207.10.1227/NEU.0b013e3182077efd

    > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 8.Chang J. Google Glass assists surgeons and medical students at Ohio State University. http://abcnews.go.com/Technology/google-glass-assists-surgeons-medical-students-ohio-state/story?id=20109218. Accessed September 17, 2013.

    > Google Scholar
  • 9.Hay T. Google Glass could become a fixture in the operating room. http://blogs.wsj.com/venturecapital/2013/08/12/google-glass-could-become-a-fixture-in-the-operating-room/?mod=wsj_streaming_latest-headlines. Accessed September 17, 2013.

    > Google Scholar
  • 10.Ekatha JA. In a first, Chennai doctor uses Google Glass to air operation live. http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2013-09-18/gadgets-special/42181937_1_google-glass-gadget-operaion-theatre. Accessed September 18, 2013.

    > Google Scholar
  • 11.De Benito E. El quirofano global, de la mano de Google Glass. http://www.sociedad.elpais.com. Accessed September 17, 2013.

    > Google Scholar
  • 12.Broderick TJ, Harnett BM, Doarn CR, Rodas EB, Merrell RC. Real-time Internet connections: implications for surgical decision making in laparoscopy. Ann Surg. 2001; 234(2):165–171.10.1097/00000658-200108000-00005

    > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 13.Gandsas A, Altrudi R, Pleatman M, Silva Y. Live interactive broadcast of laparoscopic surgery via the Internet. Surg Endosc. 1998; 12(3):252–255.10.1007/s004649900645

    > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 14.Rafiq A, Moore JA, Zhao X, Doarn CR, Merrell RC. Digital video capture and synchronous consultation in open surgery. Ann Surg. 2004; 239(4):567–573.10.1097/01.sla.0000118749.24645.45

    > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 15.Abe Y, Sato S, Kato K, et al.A novel 3D guidance system using augmented reality for percutaneous vertebroplasty. J Neurosurg Spine. 2013; 19(4):492–501.10.3171/2013.7.SPINE12917

    > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 16.Marzano E, Piardi T, Soler L, et al.Augmented reality-guided artery-first pancreaticoduodenectomy. J Gastrointest Surg. 2013; 17(11):1980–1983.10.1007/s11605-013-2307-1

    > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 17.Mitha AP, Almekhlafi MA, Janjua MJ, Albuquerque FC, McDougall CG. Simulation and augmented reality in endovascular neurosurgery: lessons from aviation. Neurosurgery. 2013; ( 72suppl 1):107–114.10.1227/NEU.0b013e31827981fd

    > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 18.Ponce BA, Jennings JK, Sheppard ED, et al.Telementoring: augmented reality in orthopaedic education. Paper presented at: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons; March 19–23, 2013; Chicago, IL.

    > Google Scholar
  • 19.Phillips JD, Withrow K. Virtual interactive presence: an operative feasibility study. Paper presented at: American Academy of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery Annual Meeting; September 9–12, 2013; Washington, DC.

    > Google Scholar
  • 20.Chapman WC. No silver bullet in liver transection: what has 35 years of new technology added to liver surgery?Ann Surg. 2009; 250(2):204–205.10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181b6df4b

    > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 21.Koopmann MC, Kudsk KA, Szotkowski MJ, Rees SM. A team-based protocol and electromagnetic technology eliminate feeding tube placement complications. Ann Surg. 2011; 253(2):287–302.10.1097/SLA.0b013e318208f550

    > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 22.Kumar RK. Technology and healthcare costs. Ann Pediatr Cardiol. 2011; 4(1):84–86.10.4103/0974-2069.79634

    > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 23.Hodgins JL, Veillette C. Arthroscopic proficiency: methods in evaluating competency. BMC Med Educ. 2013; 13:61.10.1186/1472-6920-13-61

    > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 24.Kassab E, Tun JK, Arora S, et al.“Blowing up the barriers” in surgical training: exploring and validating the concept of distributed simulation. Ann Surg. 2011; 254(6):1059–1065.10.1097/SLA.0b013e318228944a

    > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 25.Mattar SG, Alseidi AA, Jones DB, et al.General surgery residency inadequately prepares trainees for fellowship: results of a survey of fellowship program directors. Ann Surg. 2013; 258(3):440–449.10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182a191ca

    > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 26.Karam MD, Pedowitz RA, Natividad H, Murray J, Marsh JL. Current and future use of surgical skills training laboratories in orthopaedic resident education: a national survey. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013; 95(1):e4.10.2106/JBJS.L.00177

    > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 27.Aggarwal R, Ward J, Balasundaram I, Sains P, Athanasiou T, Darzi A. Proving the effectiveness of virtual reality simulation for training in laparoscopic surgery. Ann Surg. 2007; 246(5):771–779.10.1097/SLA.0b013e3180f61b09

    > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 28.Grantcharov TP, Bardram L, Funch-Jensen P, Rosenberg J. Learning curves and impact of previous operative experience on performance on a virtual reality simulator to test laparoscopic surgical skills. Am J Surg. 2003; 185(2):146–149.10.1016/S0002-9610(02)01213-8

    > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 29.Henn RF, Shah N, Warner JJ, Gomoll AH. Shoulder arthroscopy simulator training improves shoulder arthroscopy performance in a cadaveric model. Arthroscopy. 2013; 29(6):982–985.10.1016/j.arthro.2013.02.013

    > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 30.Lange T, Indelicato DJ, Rosen JM. Virtual reality in surgical training. Surg Oncol Clin N Am. 2000; 9(1):61–79.

    > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 31.Armstrong DG, Rankin TM, Giovinco NA, Mills JL, Matsuoka Y. A heads-up display for diabetic limb salvage surgery: a view through the Google looking glass. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2014; 8(5):951–956.10.1177/1932296814535561

    > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

We use cookies on this site to enhance your user experience. For a complete overview of all the cookies used, please see our privacy policy.

×