Skip to main content
Published Online:https://doi.org/10.3928/01477447-20141023-53Cited by:8

Abstract

A cementless femoral component may allow for a smaller surgical incision when a minimally invasive approach is used during primary total knee arthroplasty. Fixation by cement is the gold standard for total knee arthroplasty. The results of cementless total knee arthroplasty are mixed. Cementless femoral components have done well. Although some tibial components have performed well at long-term follow-up, others have been plagued by high rates of loosening and revision. The question remains whether the results of hybrid total knee arthroplasty, consisting of an uncemented femoral component and a cemented tibial component, will equal those of total knee replacement fixed with cement at long-term follow-up. The authors reviewed 148 hybrid total knee arthroplasties performed by a single surgeon between 1993 and 1995. At a mean follow-up of 14 years (range, 10–16) 5 knees (4%) had undergone revision of both the femoral and tibial components. Only 1 knee required revision for aseptic loosening. Two knees were revised for sepsis; 1 knee had been revised for fracture and 1 for instability. No additional femoral or tibial components were loose by radiographic criteria. Mild focal femoral osteolysis was identified in 3 knees (2%), and minor tibial osteolysis was present in 2 knees (1%). The rate of survivorship with revision for aseptic loosening as the end point was 99% (95% confidence interval, 0.97–100) at 16 years for both the femoral and tibial components. In this series, hybrid total knee arthroplasty showed excellent fixation at 16 years.

  • 1.Callaghan JJ, Wells CW, Liu SS, Goetz DD, Johnston RC. Cemented rotating-platform total knee replacement: a concise follow-up, at a minimum of twenty years, of a previous report. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010; 92(7):1635–1639.10.2106/JBJS.I.01012

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 2.Ritter MA, Berend ME, Meding JB, Keating EM, Faris PM, Crites BM. Long-term follow-up of anatomic graduated components posterior cruciate-retaining total knee replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001; (388):51–57.10.1097/00003086-200107000-00009

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 3.Ritter MA. The anatomical graduated component total knee replacement: a long-term evaluation with a 20-year survival analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2009; 91:745–749.10.1302/0301-620X.91B6.21854

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 4.Rodriguez JA, Bhende H, Ranawat CS. Total condylar knee replacement: a 20-year follow-up study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001; (388):10–17.10.1097/00003086-200107000-00004

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 5.Whiteside LA. Long-term followup of the bone-ingrowth Ortholoc knee system without a metal-backed patella. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001; (388):77–84.10.1097/00003086-200107000-00012

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 6.Hofmann AA, Evanich JD, Ferguson RP, Camargo MP. Ten- to 14-year clinical follow-up of the cementless Natural Knee system. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001; (388):85–94.10.1097/00003086-200107000-00013

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 7.Ritter MA, Meneghini RM. Twenty-year survivorship of cementless anatomic graduated component total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2010; 25(4):507–513.10.1016/j.arth.2009.04.018

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 8.Duffy GP, Berry DJ, Rand JA. Cement versus cementless fixation in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1998; (356):66–72.10.1097/00003086-199811000-00011

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 9.Barrack RL, Nakamura SJ, Hopkins SG, Rosenzweig S. Winner of the 2003 James A. Rand Young Investigator’s Award: early failure of cementless mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2004; 19(7 suppl 2):101–106.10.1016/j.arth.2004.06.007

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 10.Whiteside LA. Effect of porous-coating configuration on tibial osteolysis after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1995; (321):92–97.

    MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 11.Fehring TK, Odum S, Griffin WL, Mason JB, Nadaud M. Early failures in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001; (392):315–318.10.1097/00003086-200111000-00041

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 12.Drexler M, Dwyer T, Marmor M, et al.Cementless fixation in total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2012; 94(suppl):85–89.10.1302/0301-620X.94B11.30827

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 13.Park JW, Kim YH. Simultaneous cemented and cementless total knee replacement in the same patients: a prospective comparison of long-term outcomes using an identical design of NexGen prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2011; 93:1479–1486.10.1302/0301-620X.93B11.27507

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 14.Buechel FF. Long-term follow-up after mobile-bearing total knee replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002; (404):40–50.10.1097/00003086-200211000-00008

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 15.Ewald FC. The Knee Society total knee arthroplasty roentgenographic evaluation and scoring system. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989; (248):9–12.

    MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 16.Kaplan EL, Meier P. Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations. J Am Stat Assoc. 1958; 53:457–481.10.1080/01621459.1958.10501452

    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 17.Schmalzried TP, Harris WH. Hybrid total hip replacement: a 6.5-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1993; 75(4):608–615.

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 18.Pavone V, Boettner F, Fickert S, Sculco TP. Total condylar knee arthroplasty: a long-term follow-up. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001; (388):18–25.10.1097/00003086-200107000-00005

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

We use cookies on this site to enhance your user experience. For a complete overview of all the cookies used, please see our privacy policy.

×