Skip to main content
Published Online:https://doi.org/10.3928/01477447-20150204-60Cited by:10

Abstract

The Schatzker classification of tibial plateau fractures is widely accepted. Type IV fractures are medial tibial plateau fractures that are either split off as a wedge fragment or depressed and comminuted. Posterior articular surface depression in Schatzker type IV tibial plateau fractures can be seen as a unique variant that increases the difficulty of reduction of the articular surface. Its morphologic characteristics have not been fully studied, and the incidence is sometimes underestimated. The goal of this study was to evaluate the morphologic characteristics of posterior articular depression in Schatzker type IV fractures based on computed tomography measurements. From January 2009 to December 2011, the medical records, including digital radiologic data, of all patients treated for tibial plateau fracture at the authors’ institution were retrospectively analyzed. Articular surface depression deeper than 5 mm was the criterion for study inclusion. The depression depth, precise location of the articular depression center, surface area percentage, and distance of the fracture gap to the depression center were calculated. One hundred fifteen cases of Schatzker type IV fracture were retrieved, and a total of 47.83% (55 of 115) cases had posterior articular surface depression. The average depth of the depressed articular surface was 12.41 mm, the surface area percentage was 20.15% of the entire tibial plateau, and the gap distance from the medial direction was 41.40 mm, 2.8 times longer than that from the posterior direction, which was 14.91 mm. Posterior articular surface depression occurs in nearly half of Schatzker type IV fractures, and the posterior approach provides more direct access to the depression than the medial approach. [Orthopedics. 2015; 38(2):e124–e128.]

  • 1.Schatzker J, McBroom R, Bruce D. The tibial plateau fracture: the Toronto experience 1968–1975. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1979; 138:94–104.

    Google Scholar
  • 2.Carlson DA. Posterior bicondylar tibial plateau fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 2005; 19(2):73–78.10.1097/00005131-200502000-00001

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 3.Potocnik P, Acklin YP, Sommer C. Operative strategy in postero-medial fracture-dislocation of the proximal tibia. Injury. 2011; 42(10):1060–1065.10.1016/j.injury.2011.03.041

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 4.Frosch KH, Balcarek P, Walde T, Stürmer KM. A new posterolateral approach without fibula osteotomy for the treatment of tibial plateau fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 2010; 24(8):515–520.10.1097/BOT.0b013e3181e5e17d

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 5.Brunner A, Honigmann P, Horisberger M, Babst R. Open reduction and fixation of medial Moore type II fractures of the tibial plateau by a direct dorsal approach. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2009; 129(9):1233–1238.10.1007/s00402-009-0841-9

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 6.Luo CF, Sun H, Zhang B, Zeng BF. Three-column fixation for complex tibial plateau fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 2010; 24(11):683–692.10.1097/BOT.0b013e3181d436f3

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 7.Jensen DB, Rude C, Duus B, Bjerg-Nielsen A. Tibial plateau fractures: a comparison of conservative and surgical treatment. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1990; 72:49–52.

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 8.Honkonen SE. Indications for surgical treatment of tibial condyle fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1994; 302:199–205.

    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 9.Barei DP, O’Mara TJ, Taitsman LA, Dunbar RP, Nork SE. Frequency and fracture morphology of the posteromedial fragment in bicondylar tibial plateau fracture patterns. J Orthop Trauma. 2008; 22(3):176–182.10.1097/BOT.0b013e318169ef08

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 10.Weaver MJ, Harris MB, Strom AC, et al.Fracture pattern and fixation type related to loss of reduction in bicondylar tibial plateau fractures. Injury. 2012; 43(6):864–869.10.1016/j.injury.2011.10.035

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 11.Eggli S, Hartel MJ, Kohl S, Haupt U, Exadaktylos AK, Röder C. Unstable bicondylar tibial plateau fractures: a clinical investigation. J Orthop Trauma. 2008; 22(10):673–679.10.1097/BOT.0b013e31818b1452

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 12.Zhai Q, Luo C, Zhu Y, et al.Morphological characteristics of split-depression fractures of the lateral tibial plateau (Schatzker type II): a computer-tomography-based study. Int Orthop. 2013; 37(5):911–917.10.1007/s00264-013-1825-5

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 13.Tanifuji O, Sato T, Kobayashi K, et al.Three-dimensional in vivo motion analysis of normal knees using single-plane fluoroscopy. J Orthop Sci. 2011; 16(6):710–718.10.1007/s00776-011-0149-9

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 14.Sciadini MF, Sims SH. Proximal tibial intra-articular osteotomy for treatment of complex Schatzker type IV tibial plateau fractures with lateral joint line impaction: description of surgical technique and report of nine cases. J Orthop Trauma. 2013; 27(1):e18–e23.10.1097/BOT.0b013e31825316ea

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 15.He X, Ye P, Hu Y, et al.A posterior inverted L-shaped approach for the treatment of posterior bicondylar tibial plateau fractures. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2013; 133(1):23–28.10.1007/s00402-012-1632-2

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 16.Ringus VM, Lemley FR, Hubbard DF, Wearden S, Jones DL. Lateral tibial plateau fracture depression as a predictor of lateral meniscus pathology. Orthopedics. 2010; 33(2):80–84.10.3928/01477447-20100104-05

    LinkGoogle Scholar

We use cookies on this site to enhance your user experience. For a complete overview of all the cookies used, please see our privacy policy.

×