Abstract
The right patient selection with the correct surgical treatment are prerequisite for a positive result in total hip arthroplasty (THA). Short stem implants demand a shorter anchoring length in accordance with the proper indication. Although appropriate indications for short stems have been discussed in the literature, there currently is no clear definition. The lack of an accepted categorization of short hip stems complicates the situation further. This article briefly reviews the literature and highlights the authors’ results and experiences in short stem THA in an effort to establish a proper discrimination between indications and contraindications for the Metha short stem. Results presented include a retrospective data collection and follow-up examination of 126 patients who underwent short stem THA with 2- and 4-year results. Anchoring principles of the short stem are reviewed, and a complication and failure analysis based on 7 femoral revisions in 1092 short stem THAs is presented. Selection criteria for short stem THA are patients younger than 70 years with primary osteoarthritis and dysplastic femoral deformities, and indications of avascular head necrosis. Adequate bone quality must be confirmed intraoperatively, assessing whether the bone structure in the area of the femoral neck is strong enough to support the short stem load transmission. Coxa vara and high dysplastic femoral neck antetorsion are contraindications for short stems. Wide and short femoral necks, implant undersizing, and a deep stem position below the femoral osteotomy compromise stability and must be avoided with an appropriate surgical technique. Long-term data are not yet available.
- 1.Wittenberg RH, Steffen R, Windhagen H, Bücking P, Wilcke A. Five-year results of a cementless short-hip-stem prosthesis. Orthop Rev. 2013; 5(1):e4.
10.4081/or.2013.e4 Crossref, Google Scholar - 2.Thorey F, Hoefer C, Abdi-Tabari N, Lerch M, Budde S, Windhagen H. Clinical results of the Metha short hip stem: a perspective for younger patients?Orthop Rev (Pavia). 2013; 5(4):147–150.
10.4081/or.2013.e34 Crossref, Google Scholar - 3.Gronewold J, Berner S, Olender G, Changes in strain patterns after implantation of a short stem with metaphyseal anchorage compared to a standarad stem: an experimental study in synthetic bone. Orthop Rev (Pavia). 2014; 6(1):5211.
10.4081/or.2014.5211 Crossref Medline, Google Scholar - 4.Lerch M, Kurtz A, Stukenborg-Colsman C, Bone remodeling after total hip arthroplasty with a short stemmed metaphyseal loading implant: Finite element analysis validated by a prospective DEXA investigation. J Orthop Res. 2012; 30(11):1822–1829.
10.1002/jor.22120 Crossref Medline, Google Scholar - 5.Schmidutz F, Graf T, Mazoochian F, Fottner A, Bauer-Melnyk A, Jansson V. Migration analysis of a metaphyseal anchored short-stem hip prosthesis. Acta Orthop. 2012; 83(4):360–365.
10.3109/17453674.2012.712891 Crossref Medline, Google Scholar - 6.Floerkemeier T, Tscheuschner N, Calliess T, Cementless short stem hip arthroplasty METHA® as an encouraging option in adults with osteonecrosis of the femoral head. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2012; 132(8):1125–1131.
10.1007/s00402-012-1524-5 Crossref Medline, Google Scholar - 7.Braun A, Sabah A. Two-year results of a modular short hip stem prosthesis—a prospective study. Z Orthop Unfall. 2009; 147:700–706. Crossref Medline, Google Scholar
- 8.Schmidutz F, Steinbrück A, Wanke-Jellinek L, Pietschmann M, Jansson V, Fottner A. The accuracy of digital templating: a comparison of short-stem total hip arthroplasty and conventional total hip arthroplasty. Int Orthop. 2012; 36(9):1767–1772.
10.1007/s00264-012-1532-7 Crossref Medline, Google Scholar - 9.Floerkemeier T, Gronewold J, Berner S, The influence of resection height on proximal femoral strain patterns after Metha short stem hip arthroplasty: an experimental study on composite femora. Int Orthop. 2013; 37(3):369–377.
10.1007/s00264-012-1725-0 Crossref Medline, Google Scholar - 10.Mihalko WM, Saleh KJ, Heller MO, Mollard B, König C, Kammerzell S. Femoral neck cut level affects positioning of modular short-stem implant. Orthopedics. 2009; 32(10 suppl):18–21.
10.3928/01477447-20090915-53 Crossref Medline, Google Scholar
