Skip to main content
Published Online:https://doi.org/10.3928/01477447-20160315-05Cited by:17

Abstract

Fractures of the fifth metacarpal neck, or boxer's fractures, are common, particularly among young men. Because of the high frequency of this injury, there is a considerable range of treatment options. The purpose of this systematic review was to determine whether reduction and splint or cast immobilization is necessary for fractures of the fifth metacarpal neck. The authors conducted a systematic review of all published studies that randomized these fractures to cast immobilization vs treatment with soft wrap without reduction. Cast immobilization is not superior to soft wrap without reduction in most cases. The study found that reduction and cast immobilization is not necessary for boxer's fractures. [Orthopedics. 2016; 39(3):188–192.]

  • 1.Hunter JM, Cowen NJ. Fifth metacarpal fractures in a compensation clinic population: a report on one hundred and thirty-three cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1970; 52(6):1159–1165.

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 2.Nakashian MN, Pointer L, Owens BD, Wolf JM. Incidence of metacarpal fractures in the US population. Hand (N Y). 2012; 7(4):426–430.10.1007/s11552-012-9442-0

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 3.Chung KC, Spilson SV. The frequency and epidemiology of hand and forearm fractures in the United States. J Hand Surg Am. 2001; 26(5):908–915.10.1053/jhsu.2001.26322

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 4.Kural C, Alkas L, Tuzun S, Centinus E, Ugras AA, Alkas M. Anger scale and anger types of patients with fifth metacarpal neck fractures. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2011; 45(5):312–315.

    MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 5.Greer MA. Incidence of metacarpal fractures in U.S. soldiers stationed in South Korea. J Hand Ther. 2008; 21(2):137–141.10.1197/j.jht.2007.08.017

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 6.Trybus M, Lorkowski J, Brongel L, Hladki W. Causes and consequences of hand injuries. Am J Sur. 2006; 192(1):52–57.10.1016/j.amjsurg.2005.10.055

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 7.Gudmundsen TE, Borgen L. Fractures of the fifth metacarpal. Acta Radiol. 2009; 50(3):296–300.10.1080/02841850802709201

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 8.Ozturk I, Erturer E, Sahin F, et al.Effects of fusion angle on functional results following non-operative treatment for fracture of the neck of the fifth metacarpal. Injury. 2008; 39(12):1464–1466.10.1016/j.injury.2008.03.016

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 9.Winter M, Balaguer T, Bessiere C, Carles M, Lebreton E. Surgical treatment of the boxer's fracture: transverse pinning versus intramedullary pinning. J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2007; 32(6):709–713.10.1016/j.jhse.2007.07.011

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 10.Stern PJ. Fractures of metacarpals and phalanges. In: , Hotckiss RN, Pederson WC, Wolfe SW, Green DP, eds. Green's Operative Hand Surgery. Vol 1. 5th ed. New York, NY: Churchill Livingstone; 2005.

    Google Scholar
  • 11.Theeuwen GA, Lemmens JA, van Niekerk JL. Conservative treatment of boxer's fracture: a retrospective analysis. Injury. 1991; 22(5):394–396.10.1016/0020-1383(91)90103-L

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 12.Westbrook AP, Davis TR, Armstrong D, Burke FD. The clinical significance of malunion of fractures of the neck and shaft of the little finger metacarpal. J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2008; 33(6):732–739.10.1177/1753193408092497

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 13.Ali A, Hamman J, Mass DP. The biomechanical effects of angulated boxer's fractures. J Hand Surg Am. 1999; 24(4):835–844.10.1053/jhsu.1999.0835

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 14.McKerrell J, Bowen V, Johnston G, Zondervan J. Boxer's fractures: conservative or operative management?J Trauma. 1987; 27(5):486–490.10.1097/00005373-198705000-00005

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 15.Prokop A, Helling HJ, Kulus S, Rehm KE. Conservative treatment of metacarpal fracture [in German]. Kongressbd Dtsch Ges Chir Kongr. 2002; 119:532–535.

    MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 16.Braakman M, Oderwald EE, Haentjens MH. Functional taping of fractures of the 5th metacarpal results in a quicker recovery. Injury. 1998; 29(1):5–9.10.1016/S0020-1383(97)00106-X

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 17.Statius Muller MG, Poolman RW, von Hoogstraten MJ, Steller EP. Immediate mobilization gives good results in boxer's fractures with volar angulation up to 70 degrees: a prospective randomized trial comparing immediate mobilization with cast immobilization. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2003; 123(10):534–537.10.1007/s00402-003-0580-2

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 18.McMahon PJ, Woods DA, Burge PD. Initial treatment of closed metacarpal fractures: a controlled comparison of compression glove and splintage. J Hand Surg Br. 1994; 19(5):597–600.10.1016/0266-7681(94)90123-6

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 19.Hansen PB, Hansen TB. The treatment of fractures of the ring and little metacarpal necks: a prospective randomized study of three different types of treatment. J Hand Surg Br. 1998; 23(2):245–247.10.1016/S0266-7681(98)80186-1

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 20.Kuokkanen HO, Mulari-Keranen SK, Niskanen RO, Haapala JK, Korkala OL. Treatment of subcapital fractures of the fifth metacarpal bone: a prospective randomised comparison between functional treatment and reposition and splinting. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg. 1999; 33(3):315–317.10.1080/02844319950159299

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 21.van Aaken J, Kampfen S, Berli M, Fritschy D, Della Santa D, Fusetti C. Outcome of boxer's fractures treated by a soft wrap and buddy taping: a prospective study. Hand (N Y). 2007; 2(4):212–217.10.1007/s11552-007-9054-2

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 22.Poulsen MB, Hansen TB, Bang DM. Treatment of subcapital fractures of the 4th and the 5th metacarpus: a clinical trial of the results after treatment without immobilization and reposition and a study of the treatment of these fractures at casualty departments in Denmark [in Danish]. Ugeskr Laeger. 1994; 156(10):1465–1467.

    MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 23.Harding IJ, Parry D, Barrington RL. The use of a moulded metacarpal brace versus neighbor strapping for fractures of the little finger metacarpal neck. J Hand Surg Br. 2001; 26(3):261–263.10.1054/jhsb.2000.0509

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 24.Lowdon IM. Fractures of the metacarpal neck of the little finger. Injury. 1986; 17(3):189–192.10.1016/0020-1383(86)90332-3

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 25.Poolman RW, Goslings JC, Lee JB, Statius Muller M, Steller EP, Struijs PA. Conservative treatment for closed fifth (small finger) metacarpal neck fractures. Cochrane Database Syst Rev2005; 3:CD003210.

    MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 26.Bansal R, Craigen MA. Fifth metacarpal neck fractures: is follow-up required?J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2007; 32(1):69–73.10.1016/j.jhsb.2006.09.021

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 27.Braakman M. Is anatomic reduction of fractures of the fourth and fifth metacarpals useful?Acta Orthop Belg. 1997; 63(2):106–109.

    MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 28.Braakman M. Are lateral x-rays useful in the treatment of fractures of the fourth and fifth metacarpals. Injury. 1998; 29(1):1–3.10.1016/S0020-1383(97)00101-0

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 29.Breddam M, Hansen TB. Subcapital fractures of the fourth and fifth metacarpals treated without splinting and reposition. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg. 1995; 29(3):269–270.10.3109/02844319509050138

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 30.Geiger KR, Karpman RR. Necrosis of the skin over the metacarpal as a result of functional bracing: a report of three cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1989; 71(8):1199–1202.

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

We use cookies on this site to enhance your user experience. For a complete overview of all the cookies used, please see our privacy policy.

×