Medial Compartment Decompression by Proximal Fibular Osteotomy: A Biomechanical Cadaver Study
Abstract
Medial compartment knee osteoarthritis is a painful and debilitating disease. A proximal fibular osteotomy is a novel, simple surgical technique that may reduce pain and improve function for patients with osteoarthritis. The purpose of this biomechanical cadaver study was to determine what effect proximal fibular osteotomy had on knee joint and ankle pressures and tibia strain. Ten matched pairs of cadaver legs were tested in compression to 1.1 times body weight comparing intact and with proximal fibular osteotomy at 0°, 15°, and 30° of flexion. Sensors were inserted into the knee and ankle joint to measure pressure, force, and contact area. Strain was measured with a strain gage on the anterior medial tibia. In the medial compartment, the peak force, contact area, and pressure all decreased from intact to after fibular osteotomy, with significant differences at 15° of flexion (P<.05). There were no significant differences in the lateral compartment for any measures. In the ankle joint, the peak force and pressure decreased from intact to after fibular osteotomy at all 3 flexion angles. There were no significant changes in strain in the tibia. Proximal fibular osteotomy decreases the pressure in the medial compartment of the knee, which may reduce knee pain and improve function in patients with medial compartment knee osteoarthritis. [Orthopedics. 2018; 41(4):e496–e501.]
- 1.Felson DT, Naimark A, Anderson J, Kazis L, Castelli W, Meenan RF. The prevalence of knee osteoarthritis in the elderly: the Framingham Osteoarthritis Study. Arthritis Rheum. 1987; 30(8):914–918.
10.1002/art.1780300811 > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar - 2.Focht BC. Move to improve: how knee osteo-arthritis patients can use exercise to enhance quality of life. ACSMs Health Fit J. 2012; 16(5):24–28. > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
- 3.Vincent KR, Conrad BP, Fregly BJ, Vincent HK. The pathophysiology of osteoarthritis: a mechanical perspective on the knee joint. PM R. 2012; 4(5)(suppl):S3–S9.
10.1016/j.pmrj.2012.01.020 > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar - 4.Yang ZY, Chen W, Li CX, Medial compartment decompression by fibular osteotomy to treat medial compartment knee osteoarthritis: a pilot study. Orthopedics. 2015; 38(12):e1110–e1114.
10.3928/01477447-20151120-08 > LinkGoogle Scholar - 5.Wu LD, Hahne HJ, Hassenpflug T. A long-term follow-up study of high tibial osteotomy for medial compartment osteoarthrosis. Chin J Traumatol. 2004; 7(6):348–353. > MedlineGoogle Scholar
- 6.Sprenger TR, Doerzbacher JF. Tibial osteotomy for the treatment of varus gonarthrosis: survival and failure analysis to twenty-two years. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003; 85(3):469–474.
10.2106/00004623-200303000-00011 > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar - 7.Schnurr C, Jarrous M, Güdden I, Eysel P, König DP. Pre-operative arthritis severity as a predictor for total knee arthroplasty patients' satisfaction. Int Orthop. 2013; 37(7):1257–1261.
10.1007/s00264-013-1862-0 > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar - 8.Wang X, Wei L, Lv Z, Proximal fibular osteotomy: a new surgery for pain relief and improvement of joint function in patients with knee osteoarthritis. J Int Med Res. 2017; 45(1):282–289.
10.1177/0300060516676630 > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar - 9.Dell RB, Holleran S, Ramakrishnan R. Sample size determination. ILAR J. 2002; 43(4):207–213.
10.1093/ilar.43.4.207 > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar - 10.Yazdi H, Mallakzadeh M, Mohtajeb M, Farshidfar SS, Baghery A, Givehchian B. The effect of partial fibulectomy on contact pressure of the knee: a cadaveric study. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2014; 24(7):1285–1289.
10.1007/s00590-013-1381-0 > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar - 11.Levine M, Ensom MH. Post hoc power analysis: an idea whose time has passed?Pharmacotherapy. 2001; 21(4):405–409.
10.1592/phco.21.5.405.34503 > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar - 12.Goodman SN, Berlin JA. The use of predicted confidence intervals when planning experiments and the misuse of power when interpreting results. Ann Intern Med. 1994; 121(3):200–206.
10.7326/0003-4819-121-3-199408010-00008 > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar - 13.Kutzner I, Heinlein B, Graichen F, Loading of the knee joint during activities of daily living measured in vivo in five subjects. J Biomech. 2010; 43(11):2164–2173.
10.1016/j.jbiomech.2010.03.046 > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar - 14.Wilharm A, Hurschler C, Dermitas T, Bohnsack M. Use of Tekscan K-scan sensors for retropatellar pressure measurement avoiding errors during implantation and the effects of shear forces on the measurement precision. Biomed Res Int. 2013; 2013:829171.
10.1155/2013/829171 > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar - 15.Krackow KA, Mandeville DS, Rachala SR, Bayers-Thering M, Osternig LR. Torsion deformity and joint loading for medial knee osteoarthritis. Gait Posture. 2011; 33(4):625–629.
10.1016/j.gaitpost.2011.02.006 > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar - 16.Yang L, Xu HZ, Liang DZ, Lu W, Zhong SZ, Ouyang J. Biomechanical analysis of the impact of fibular osteotomies at tibiotalar joint: a cadaveric study. Indian J Orthop. 2012; 46(5):520–524.
10.4103/0019-5413.101043 > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar - 17.Takebe K, Nakagawa A, Minami H, Kanazawa H, Hirohata K. Role of the fibula in weight-bearing. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1984; 184:289–292. > CrossrefGoogle Scholar
- 18.Goh JC, Mech AM, Lee EH, Ang EJ, Bayon P, Pho RW. Biomechanical study on the load-bearing characteristics of the fibula and the effects of fibular resection. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1992; 279:223–228. > CrossrefGoogle Scholar
- 19.Wang Q, Whittle M, Cunningham J, Kenwright J. Fibula and its ligaments in load transmission and ankle joint stability. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996; 330:261–270.
10.1097/00003086-199609000-00034 > CrossrefGoogle Scholar
