Skip to main content
Published Online:https://doi.org/10.3928/01477447-20200818-01Cited by:2

Abstract

Concordance, the concept of patients having shared demographic/socioeconomic characteristics with their physicians, has been associated with improved patient satisfaction and outcomes in primary care but has not been studied in subspecialty care. The objective of this study was to investigate whether patients value concordance with their specialty physicians. The authors assessed the importance of concordance in subspecialist care in 2 cohorts of participants. The first cohort consisted of patients seeking care at a multispecialty orthopedic clinic. The second cohort consisted of volunteer participants recruited from an online platform. Each participant completed a survey scored on an ordinal scale which characteristics of their physicians they find important for their primary care physician (PCP) and a specialist. The characteristics included age, sex, ethnicity, sexual orientation, primary language spoken, and religion. The difference in concordance scores for PCPs and specialists were compared with paired t tests with a Bonferroni correction. A total of 118 patients were recruited in clinic, and a total of 982 volunteers were recruited online. In the clinic cohort, the level of importance for patient–physician concordance of age, ethnicity, language, and religion was not significantly different between PCPs and specialists. In the volunteer cohort, the level of importance for concordance of age, sex, national origin, language, and religion was not significantly different between PCPs and specialists. The volunteers recruited online had significantly higher concordance scores than the patients recruited in clinic for most variables. Patients find patient–physician concordance as important in specialty care as they do in primary care. This may have similar effects on patient outcomes in specialty care. [Orthopedics. 2020;43(5):315–319.]

  • 1.Street RL, O'Malley KJ, Cooper LA, Haidet P. Understanding concordance in patient-physician relationships: personal and ethnic dimensions of shared identity. Ann Fam Med. 2008; 6(3):198–205. 10.1370/afm.821 PMID:18474881

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 2.LaVeist TA, Nuru-Jeter A, Jones KE. The association of doctor-patient race concordance with health services utilization. J Public Health Policy. 2003; 24(3–4):312–323. 10.2307/3343378 PMID:15015865

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 3.Alsan M, Garrick O, Graziani GC. Does diversity matter for health? Experimental evidence from Oakland. https://differencesmatter.ucsf.edu/sites/g/files/tkssra1966/f/wysiwyg/oakland_0%20%281%29.pdf. Accessed October 2018.

    Google Scholar
  • 4.Sandhu H, Adams A, Singleton L, Clark-Carter D, Kidd J. The impact of gender dyads on doctor-patient communication: a systematic review. Patient Educ Couns. 2009; 76(3):348–355. 10.1016/j.pec.2009.07.010 PMID:19647969

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 5.Lurie N, Slater J, McGovern P, Ekstrum J, Quam L, Margolis K. Preventive care for women: does the sex of the physician matter?N Engl J Med. 1993; 329(7):478–482. 10.1056/NEJM199308123290707 PMID:8332153

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 6.Greenwood BN, Carnahan S, Huang L. Patient-physician gender concordance and increased mortality among female heart attack patients. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2018; 115(34):8569–8574. 10.1073/pnas.1800097115

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 7.Bischoff A, Hudelson P, Bovier PA. Doctor-patient gender concordance and patient satisfaction in interpreter-mediated consultations: an exploratory study. J Travel Med. 2008; 15(1):1–5. 10.1111/j.1708-8305.2007.00163.x PMID:18217862

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 8.Cooper LA, Roter DL, Johnson RL, Ford DE, Steinwachs DM, Powe NR. Patient-centered communication, ratings of care, and concordance of patient and physician race. Ann Intern Med. 2003; 139(11):907–915. 10.7326/0003-4819-139-11-200312020-00009 PMID:14644893

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 9.Laveist TA, Nuru-Jeter A. Is doctor-patient race concordance associated with greater satisfaction with care?J Health Soc Behav. 2002; 43(3):296–306. 10.2307/3090205 PMID:12467254

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 10.Saha S, Komaromy M, Koepsell TD, Bindman AB. Patient-physician racial concordance and the perceived quality and use of health care. Arch Intern Med. 1999; 159(9):997–1004. 10.1001/archinte.159.9.997 PMID:10326942

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 11.Schoenthaler A, Montague E, Baier Manwell L, Brown R, Schwartz MD, Linzer M. Patient-physician racial/ethnic concordance and blood pressure control: the role of trust and medication adherence. Ethn Health. 2014; 19(5):565–578. 10.1080/13557858.2013.857764 PMID:24266617

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 12.Okike K, Utuk ME, White AA. Racial and ethnic diversity in orthopaedic surgery residency programs. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011; 93(18):e107. 10.2106/JBJS.K.00108 PMID:21938358

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 13.Van Heest AE, Fishman F, Agel J. A 5-year update on the uneven distribution of women in orthopaedic surgery residency training programs in the United States. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2016; 98(15):e64. 10.2106/JBJS.15.00962 PMID:27489326

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 14.Berinsky AJ, Huber GA, Lenz GS. Evaluating online labor markets for experimental research: Amazon.com's Mechanical Turk. Polit Anal. 2012; 20(3):351–368. 10.1093/pan/mpr057

    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 15.Cunningham JA, Godinho A, Kushnir V. Using Mechanical Turk to recruit participants for internet intervention research: experience from recruitment for four trials targeting hazardous alcohol consumption. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2017; 17(1):156. 10.1186/s12874-017-0440-3 PMID:29191161

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 16.Samuel A. Amazon's Mechanical Turk has reinvented research. https://daily.jstor.org/amazons-mechanical-turk-has-reinvented-research. Accessed October 2018.

    Google Scholar
  • 17.Losina E, Michl GL, Smith KC, Katz JN. Randomized controlled trial of an educational intervention using an online risk calculator for knee osteoarthritis: effect on risk perception. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2017; 69(8):1164–1170. 10.1002/acr.23136 PMID:27788299

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 18.Streufert B, Reed SD, Orlando LA, Taylor DC, Huber JC, Mather RC. Understanding preferences for treatment after hypothetical first-time anterior shoulder dislocation: surveying an online panel utilizing a novel shared decision-making tool. Orthop J Sports Med. 2017; 5(3): 2325967117695788–2325967117695788. 10.1177/2325967117695788 PMID:28377932

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 19.Ferguson WJ, Candib LM. Culture, language, and the doctor-patient relationship. Fam Med. 2002; 34(5):353–361. PMID:12038717

    MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 20.Krupat E, Rosenkranz SL, Yeager CM, Barnard K, Putnam SM, Inui TS. The practice orientations of physicians and patients: the effect of doctor-patient congruence on satisfaction. Patient Educ Couns. 2000; 39(1):49–59. 10.1016/S0738-3991(99)00090-7 PMID:11013547

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 21.Schmittdiel J, Grumbach K, Selby JV, Quesenberry CP. Effect of physician and patient gender concordance on patient satisfaction and preventive care practices. J Gen Intern Med. 2000; 15(11):761–769. 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2000.91156.x PMID:11119167

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 22.Brooks M. Women, minorities still underrepresented in medical specialties. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-healthcare-diversity/women-minorities-still-underrepresented-in-medical-specialties-idUSKCN0QT23I20150824. Accessed October 2018.

    Google Scholar
  • 23.Chef J, Buckley A. Orthopaedic Practice in the United States: 2016 Census Survey. American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons; 2016.

    Google Scholar
  • 24.Van Heest AE, Agel J. The uneven distribution of women in orthopaedic surgery resident training programs in the United States. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012; 94(2): e9, 1–8. 10.2106/JBJS.J.01583 PMID:22258016

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 25.Sharf S. This is the average income in America's richest zip code: 2017. https://www.forbes.com/sites/samanthasharf/2017/11/28/full-list-americas-most-expensive-zip-codes-2017. Accessed October 2018.

    Google Scholar
  • 26.Pannucci CJ, Wilkins EG. Identifying and avoiding bias in research. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010; 126(2):619–625. 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181de24bc PMID:20679844

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

We use cookies on this site to enhance your user experience. For a complete overview of all the cookies used, please see our privacy policy.

×