Comparison of Lesser Toe Proximal Interphalangeal Joint Arthrodesis Versus Resection Arthroplasty: A Randomized Controlled Study
Abstract
The goal of this study was to compare operative outcomes after lesser toe deformity correction with either proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joint arthrodesis or PIP joint resection arthroplasty. A prospective randomized controlled trial was performed with 37 patients (48 toes) operated on with one of these two procedures. Evaluation of the numeric rating scale score, the American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society score, osseous consolidation, and clinical outcome was performed preoperatively and at 6 weeks and 6 months postoperatively. Both study groups showed significant improvement at 6 months postoperatively. Although osseous consolidation was significantly higher for the arthrodesis group (P=.001), this difference did not affect clinical outcomes, and at 6 months postoperatively, pain on the numeric rating scale was 0 (range, 0–7) for the arthroplasty group and 0 (range, 0–5) for the arthrodesis group (P=.669). The American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society score was 83 (range, 39–95) and 80 (range, 59–95), respectively (P=.879). No difference was observed for signs of inflammation or axis correction. Even a direct comparison of toes with radiologically osseous fusion (n=16) with those without fusion (n=32) did not show any clinical differences. This randomized controlled study showed no clinical differences in outcome between PIP joint arthrodesis and PIP joint resection arthroplasty for correction of lesser toe deformities, with good to excellent outcomes for both groups. [Orthopedics. 2022;45(2):86–90.]
- 1.. Rheumatoid forefoot deformity: pathophysiology, evaluation and operative treatment options. Int Orthop. 2013; 37(9):1719–1729.
10.1007/s00264-013-2014-2 PMID:23892468 > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar - 2.. Definitions of hammer toe and claw toe: an evaluation of the literature. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2009; 99(3):194–197.
10.7547/0980194 PMID:19448169 > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar - 3.. Opinions on lesser toe deformities among Dutch orthopaedic departments. Foot Ankle Int. 2007; 28(12):1265–1270.
10.3113/FAI.2007.1265 PMID:18173990 > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar - 4.. Operative repair of the fixed hammertoe deformity. Foot Ankle Int. 2000; 21(2):94–104.
10.1177/107110070002100202 PMID:10694020 > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar - 5.. Lesser toe deformities. Instr Course Lect. 1987; 36:137–159. PMID:
3437122 > MedlineGoogle Scholar - 6.. Treatment of symptomatic hammertoe with a proximal interphalangeal joint arthrodesis. Foot Ankle Int. 1995; 16(9):535–541.
10.1177/107110079501600904 PMID:8563920 > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar - 7.. An evaluation of operative procedures in the treatment of hammer toe. Acta Orthop Scand. 1979; 50(6 pt 1):709–712.
10.3109/17453677908991298 PMID:532600 > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar - 8.. Lesser toe PIP joint resection versus PIP joint fusion: a randomized clinical trial. Foot Ankle Int. 2016; 37(6):569–575.
10.1177/1071100716629776 PMID:26843544 > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar - 9.. Implants for lesser toes. J Foot Surg. 1983; 22(3):247–250. PMID:
6619523 > MedlineGoogle Scholar - 10.. The use of digital implants for the correction of hammer toe deformity and their potential complications and management. J Foot Surg. 1992; 31(1):63–74. PMID:
1573172 > MedlineGoogle Scholar - 11.. Retrospective comparative study of operative repair of hammertoe deformity. Foot Ankle Spec. 2014; 7(3):185–192.
10.1177/1938640014529992 PMID:24756117 > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar - 12.. Clinical outcome after percutaneous flexor tenotomy in forefoot surgery. Int Orthop. 2009; 33(5):1279–1282.
10.1007/s00264-009-0721-5 PMID:19224211 > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar - 13.. Intramedullary fixation system for the treatment of hammertoe deformity. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2015; 54(5):910–916.
10.1053/j.jfas.2015.04.004 PMID:26028601 > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar - 14.. A midterm review of lesser toe arthrodesis with an intramedullary implant. Foot Ankle Spec. 2017; 10(5):458–464.
10.1177/1938640017704943 PMID:28447473 > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar - 15.. Use of Smart Toe(©) implant for small toe arthrodesis: A smart concept? Foot Ankle Surg. 2015; 21(2):108–112.
10.1016/j.fas.2014.10.003 PMID:25937410 > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar - 16.. Comparative study of intramedullary hammertoe fixation. Foot Ankle Int. 2018; 39(4):415–425.
10.1177/1071100717745854 PMID:29337598 > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar - 17.. Correction of hammertoe deformity with novel intramedullary PIP fusion device versus K-wire fixation. Foot Ankle Int. 2017; 38(2):174–180.
10.1177/1071100716671883 PMID:27756869 > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar - 18.. Digital arthrodesis of the lesser toes. Clin Podiatr Med Surg. 2017; 34(3):289–300.
10.1016/j.cpm.2017.02.001 PMID:28576189 > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar - 19.. Arthrodese der Mittel- und Endgelenke der Kleinzehen. Oper Orthop Traumatol. 2014; 26(3):307–321, 322.
10.1007/s00064-014-0309-0 PMID:24924511 > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar - 20.. Bioabsorbable fixation screw for proximal interphalangeal arthrodesis of lesser toe deformities. Foot Ankle Int. 2017; 38(9):1020–1025.
10.1177/1071100717711925 PMID:28627315 > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar - 21.. Complication rates and short-term outcomes after operative hammertoe correction in older patients. Foot Ankle Int. 2018; 39(6):681–688.
10.1177/1071100718755472 PMID:29444584 > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
