An Analysis of Formal Patient Complaints, Risk, and Malpractice Events Involving Orthopedic Trauma Surgeons During a 10-Year Period
Abstract
Formal patient complaints and malpractice events involving orthopedic trauma surgeons (OTSs) can have substantial career implications. Our purpose was to analyze formal patient complaints, risk events, and malpractice events against OTSs during a 10-year period. We reviewed all formal patient complaints within our institution's patient advocacy database involving 9 fellowship-trained OTSs throughout a decade. Complaints were categorized using the Patient Complaint Analysis System. Potential risk and malpractice events involving the OTSs were recorded. A control group of all patients seen by the surgeons during the study period was created. Demographics between patients with complaints and the control group were analyzed, as were malpractice, risk, and complaint rates between the surgeons. Of 33,770 patients, 136 filed a formal complaint (0.40%). There were 29 malpractice claims and 2 malpractice lawsuits. The care and treatment domain accounted for the highest percentage of complaints (36%), followed by the access and availability domain (26%). Results of the logistic regression analysis indicated that private insurance (odds ratio, 1.58) and operative treatment (odds ratio, 3.65) were significantly associated with complaints. Despite statistically significant differences in the rates of complaint and risk events between surgeons, malpractice events did not differ. The rate of patient complaints within a large orthopedic trauma practice during a 10-year period was 0.40%. Patients with private insurance and those treated operatively were more likely to file a complaint. Whereas complaint rates among surgeons varied, there was no significant difference in the rate of malpractice events. Understanding patient complaint rates and categorizations may allow surgeons to target areas for improvement. [Orthopedics. 2023;46(2):121–127.]
- 1.. Lessons regarding the safety of orthopaedic patient care: an analysis of four hundred and sixty-four closed malpractice claims. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013; 95(4):e201–e208.
10.2106/JBJS.K.01272 PMID:23426777 > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar - 2.. The quality of upper extremity orthopedic care in liability claims filed and claims paid. J Hand Surg Am. 2014; 39(1):91–99.
10.1016/j.jhsa.2013.10.014 PMID:24315491 > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar - 3.. Negligence claims following non-union and malunion of long bone fractures: an analysis of 15 years of data. Injury. 2016; 47(10):2312–2314.
10.1016/j.injury.2016.07.017 PMID:27461778 > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar - 4.. Litigation in orthopedic surgery: what can we do to prevent it? Systematic analysis of 126 legal actions involving four university hospitals in France. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2018; 104(1):5–9.
10.1016/j.otsr.2017.11.002 PMID:29241815 > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar - 5.. Increased litigation burden among tibia, pelvis, and spine fractures: an analysis of 756 fracture-related malpractice cases. OTA Int. 2019; 2(3):e025.
10.1097/OI9.0000000000000025 PMID:33937654 > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar - 6.. The hospital value-based purchasing (VBP) program. Accessed August 10, 2020. https://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Quality-Initiatives-Patient-Assessment-Instruments/Value-Based-Programs/HVBP/Hospital-Value-Based-Purchasing > Google Scholar
- 7.. Transparency when things go wrong: physician attitudes about reporting medical errors to patients, peers, and institutions. J Patient Saf. 2017; 13(4):243–248.
10.1097/PTS.0000000000000153 PMID:25706909 > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar - 8.. Taking complaints seriously: using the patient safety lens. BMJ Qual Saf. 2015; 24(6):352–355.
10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004337 PMID:25977314 > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar - 9.. Patient complaints and malpractice risk. JAMA. 2002; 287(22):2951–2957.
10.1001/jama.287.22.2951 PMID:12052124 > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar - 10.. Incidence of adverse events and negligence in hospitalized patients: results of the Harvard Medical Practice Study I. N Engl J Med. 1991; 324(6):370–376.
10.1056/NEJM199102073240604 PMID:1987460 > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar - 11.. Association between orthopaedic outpatient satisfaction and non-modifiable patient factors. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2015; 97(13):1041–1048.
10.2106/JBJS.N.00950 PMID:26135070 > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar - 12.. Patient complaints about hospital services: applying a complaint taxonomy to analyse and respond to complaints. Int J Qual Health Care. 2016; 28(2):240–245.
10.1093/intqhc/mzw003 PMID:26826722 > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar - 13.. Patient complaints in healthcare systems: a systematic review and coding taxonomy. BMJ Qual Saf. 2014; 23(8):678–689.
10.1136/bmjqs-2013-002437 PMID:24876289 > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar - 14.. Development of an early identification and response model of malpractice prevention. Law Contemp Probl. 1997; 60(1):7–29.
10.2307/1191993 > CrossrefGoogle Scholar - 15.. Patient complaints and adverse surgical outcomes. Am J Med Qual. 2016; 31(5):415–422.
10.1177/1062860615584158 PMID:25916627 > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar - 16.. Association of patient satisfaction with complaints and risk management among emergency physicians. J Emerg Med. 2011; 41(4):405–411.
10.1016/j.jemermed.2010.10.021 PMID:21215554 > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar - 17.. Learning from complaints in healthcare: a realist review of academic literature, policy evidence and front-line insights. BMJ Qual Saf. 2020; 29(8):684–695.
10.1136/bmjqs-2019-009704 PMID:32019824 > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar - 18.. Depression and non-modifiable patient factors associated with patient satisfaction in an academic orthopaedic outpatient clinic: is it more than a provider issue? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2019; 477(12):2653–2661.
10.1097/CORR.0000000000000927 PMID:31764330 > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar - 19.. Mental illness is associated with more pain and worse functional outcomes after ankle fracture. OTA Int. 2019; 2(2):e037.
10.1097/OI9.0000000000000037 > CrossrefGoogle Scholar - 20.. Is satisfaction among orthopaedic trauma patients predicted by depression and activation levels? J Orthop Trauma. 2015; 29(5):e183–e187.
10.1097/BOT.0000000000000241 PMID:25233161 > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar - 21.. Patient-identified information and communication needs in the context of major trauma. BMC Health Serv Res. 2018; 18(1):163.
10.1186/s12913-018-2971-7 PMID:29514689 > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar - 22.. A trauma patient advocate is a valuable addition to the multidisciplinary trauma team: a process improvement project. Am Surg. 2016; 82(8):e183–e185.
10.1177/000313481608200803 PMID:27657560 > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar - 23.. Improving patient satisfaction in the orthopaedic trauma population. J Orthop Trauma. 2014; 28(4):e80–e84.
10.1097/01.bot.0000435604.75873.ba PMID:24158181 > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar - 24.. The prevalence and costs of defensive medicine among orthopaedic trauma surgeons: a national survey study. J Orthop Trauma. 2013; 27(10):592–597.
10.1097/BOT.0b013e31828b7ab4 PMID:23542744 > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
