An interactive case study (ICS) is a novel way to enhance the teaching of differential diagnosis to distance learning nurse practitioner students. Distance education renders the use of many teaching strategies commonly used with face-to-face students difficult, if not impossible. To meet this new pedagogical dilemma and to provide excellence in education, the ICS was developed. Kolb's theory of experiential learning supported efforts to follow the utilization of the ICS. This study sought to determine whether learning outcomes for the distance learning students were equivalent to those of on-campus students who engaged in a live-patient encounter. Accuracy of differential diagnosis lists generated by onsite and online students was compared. Equivalency testing assessed clinical, rather than only statistical, significance in data from 291 students. The ICS responses from the distance learning and onsite students differed by 4.9%, which was within the a priori equivalence estimate of 10%. Narrative data supported the findings. [J Nurs Educ. 2014;53(8):433–438.]
- Abramson J.H. (2004). WINPEPI (PEPI-for-Windows) computer programs for epidemiologists. Epidemiologic Perspectives & Innovations, 1(1), 6 Retrieved from http://www.biomedcentral.com/1742-5573/1/6
10.1186/1742-5573-1-6Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
- Bambini D., Washburn J., Perkins R. (2009). Outcomes of clinical simulation for novice nursing students: Communication, confidence, clinical judgment. Nursing Education Perspectives, 30, 79–82.
- Boyatzis R.E. (1998). Transforming qualitative information: Thematic analysis and code development. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Google Scholar
- Brewer J., Hunter A. (2006). Foundations of multimethod research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- Cook D., Hatala R., Brydges R., Zendejas B., Szotek J., Wang A., Hamstra S. (2011). Technology-enhanced simulation for health professions education. The Journal of the American Medical Association, 306, 978–988.
- Cook D., Levinson A., Garside S., Dupras D., Erwin P., Montori V. (2010). Instructional design variations in Internet-based learning for health professions education: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Academic Medicine, 85, 909–922.
10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181d6c319 20520049Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
- Creswell J.W., Plano Clark V.L. (2010). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Google Scholar
- Creswell J.W., Plano Clark V.L., Gutman M.L., Hanson W.E. (2003). Advance mixed methods research designs. In (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Google Scholar
- Dewey J. (1946). Experience and education (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Mac-Millan. Google Scholar
- Docherty C., Hoy D., Topp H., Trinder K. (2005). eLearning techniques supporting problem-based learning in clinical simulation. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 74, 527–533.
10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2005.03.009Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
- Fenwick T.J. (2003). Learning through experience: Troubling orthodoxies' and intersecting questions. Malabar, FL: Krieger. Google Scholar
- Greene J.C., Caracelli V.J. (1997). Advances in mixed-method evaluation: The challenges and benefits of integrating diverse paradigms: New directions for program evaluation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. Google Scholar
- Jeffries P. (2005). A framework for designing, implementing, and evaluating: Simulations used as teaching strategies in nursing. Nursing Education Perspectives, 26, 96–103. MedlineGoogle Scholar
- Jeffries P. (2007). Simulation in nursing education. New York, NY: National League for Nursing. Google Scholar
- Kolb A., Kolb D. (2005). Learning styles and learning spaces. Academy of Management and Learning in Higher Education, 4, 193–212.
- Kolb D.A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. Google Scholar
- Lisko S.A., O'Dell V. (2010). Integration of theory and practice: Experiential learning theory and nursing education. Nursing Education Perspectives, 31, 106–108.
- Ma I., Brindle M., Ronksley P., Lorenzetti D., Sauve R., Ghali W. (2011). Use of simulation-based education to improve outcomes of central venous catheterization: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Academic Medicine, 86, 1137–1147.
10.1097/ACM.0b013e318226a204 21785310Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
- McGaghie W., Issenberg S., Petrusa E., Scalese R. (2010). A critical review of simulation-based medical education research: 2003–3009. Medical Education, 44, 50–63.
10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03547.xCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
- McGaghie W., Issenberg S.B., Cohen I., Barsuk J., Wayne D. (2011). Does simulation-based medical education with deliberate practice yield better results than traditional clinical education? A meta-analytic comparative review of the evidence. Academic Medicine, 86, 706–711.
10.1097/ACM.0b013e318217e119 21512370Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
- Merriam S.B., Caffarella R.S., Baumgartner L.M. (2007). Learning in adulthood: A comprehensive guide (3rd ed.). San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons. Google Scholar
- Newman I., Ridenour C.S., Newman C., DeMarco G.M.P. (2003). A typology of research purposes and its relationship to mixed methods. In (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods (pp. 167–188). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Google Scholar
- Onwuegbuzie A.J., Teddlie C. (2003). A framework for analyzing data in mixed methods research. In (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods (pp. 351–383). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Google Scholar
- Scott I. (2009). Errors in clinical reasoning: Causes and remedial strategies. British Medical Journal, 339, 22–25. Google Scholar
- Skiba D., Connors H., Jeffries P. (2008). Information technologies and the transformation of nursing education. Nursing Outlook, 56, 225–230.
10.1016/j.outlook.2008.06.012 18922273Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
- Smith S.J., Roehrs C.J. (2009). High-fidelity simulation: Factors correlated with nursing student satisfaction and self-confidence. Nursing Education Perspectives, 30, 74–78.
- Tashakkori A., Teddlie C. (1998). Mixed methodology (vol. 46). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Google Scholar
- Walker E., Nowacki A. (2010). Understanding equivalence and noninferiority testing. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 26, 192–196.
10.1007/s11606-010-1513-8 20857339Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar