Skip to main content
Journal of Nursing Education, 2014;53(8):433–438
Published Online:https://doi.org/10.3928/01484834-20140724-02Cited by:16

Abstract

An interactive case study (ICS) is a novel way to enhance the teaching of differential diagnosis to distance learning nurse practitioner students. Distance education renders the use of many teaching strategies commonly used with face-to-face students difficult, if not impossible. To meet this new pedagogical dilemma and to provide excellence in education, the ICS was developed. Kolb's theory of experiential learning supported efforts to follow the utilization of the ICS. This study sought to determine whether learning outcomes for the distance learning students were equivalent to those of on-campus students who engaged in a live-patient encounter. Accuracy of differential diagnosis lists generated by onsite and online students was compared. Equivalency testing assessed clinical, rather than only statistical, significance in data from 291 students. The ICS responses from the distance learning and onsite students differed by 4.9%, which was within the a priori equivalence estimate of 10%. Narrative data supported the findings. [J Nurs Educ. 2014;53(8):433–438.]

  • Abramson J.H. (2004). WINPEPI (PEPI-for-Windows) computer programs for epidemiologists. Epidemiologic Perspectives & Innovations, 1(1), 6 Retrieved from http://www.biomedcentral.com/1742-5573/1/610.1186/1742-5573-1-6

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • Bambini D., Washburn J., Perkins R. (2009). Outcomes of clinical simulation for novice nursing students: Communication, confidence, clinical judgment. Nursing Education Perspectives, 30, 79–82.19476069

    MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • Boyatzis R.E. (1998). Transforming qualitative information: Thematic analysis and code development. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar
  • Brewer J., Hunter A. (2006). Foundations of multimethod research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.10.4135/9781412984294

    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cook D., Hatala R., Brydges R., Zendejas B., Szotek J., Wang A., Hamstra S. (2011). Technology-enhanced simulation for health professions education. The Journal of the American Medical Association, 306, 978–988.10.1001/jama.2011.1234

    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cook D., Levinson A., Garside S., Dupras D., Erwin P., Montori V. (2010). Instructional design variations in Internet-based learning for health professions education: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Academic Medicine, 85, 909–922.10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181d6c31920520049

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • Creswell J.W., Plano Clark V.L. (2010). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar
  • Creswell J.W., Plano Clark V.L., Gutman M.L., Hanson W.E. (2003). Advance mixed methods research designs. In , Tashakkori A., Teddlie C. (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar
  • Dewey J. (1946). Experience and education (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Mac-Millan.

    Google Scholar
  • Docherty C., Hoy D., Topp H., Trinder K. (2005). eLearning techniques supporting problem-based learning in clinical simulation. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 74, 527–533.10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2005.03.009

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • Fenwick T.J. (2003). Learning through experience: Troubling orthodoxies' and intersecting questions. Malabar, FL: Krieger.

    Google Scholar
  • Greene J.C., Caracelli V.J. (1997). Advances in mixed-method evaluation: The challenges and benefits of integrating diverse paradigms: New directions for program evaluation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar
  • Jeffries P. (2005). A framework for designing, implementing, and evaluating: Simulations used as teaching strategies in nursing. Nursing Education Perspectives, 26, 96–103.

    MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • Jeffries P. (2007). Simulation in nursing education. New York, NY: National League for Nursing.

    Google Scholar
  • Kolb A., Kolb D. (2005). Learning styles and learning spaces. Academy of Management and Learning in Higher Education, 4, 193–212.10.5465/amle.2005.17268566

    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kolb D.A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar
  • Lisko S.A., O'Dell V. (2010). Integration of theory and practice: Experiential learning theory and nursing education. Nursing Education Perspectives, 31, 106–108.20455368

    MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • Ma I., Brindle M., Ronksley P., Lorenzetti D., Sauve R., Ghali W. (2011). Use of simulation-based education to improve outcomes of central venous catheterization: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Academic Medicine, 86, 1137–1147.10.1097/ACM.0b013e318226a20421785310

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • McGaghie W., Issenberg S., Petrusa E., Scalese R. (2010). A critical review of simulation-based medical education research: 2003–3009. Medical Education, 44, 50–63.10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03547.x

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • McGaghie W., Issenberg S.B., Cohen I., Barsuk J., Wayne D. (2011). Does simulation-based medical education with deliberate practice yield better results than traditional clinical education? A meta-analytic comparative review of the evidence. Academic Medicine, 86, 706–711.10.1097/ACM.0b013e318217e11921512370

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • Merriam S.B., Caffarella R.S., Baumgartner L.M. (2007). Learning in adulthood: A comprehensive guide (3rd ed.). San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar
  • Newman I., Ridenour C.S., Newman C., DeMarco G.M.P. (2003). A typology of research purposes and its relationship to mixed methods. In , Tashakkori A., Teddlie C. (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods (pp. 167–188). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar
  • Onwuegbuzie A.J., Teddlie C. (2003). A framework for analyzing data in mixed methods research. In , Tashakkori A., Teddlie C. (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods (pp. 351–383). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar
  • Scott I. (2009). Errors in clinical reasoning: Causes and remedial strategies. British Medical Journal, 339, 22–25.

    Google Scholar
  • Skiba D., Connors H., Jeffries P. (2008). Information technologies and the transformation of nursing education. Nursing Outlook, 56, 225–230.10.1016/j.outlook.2008.06.01218922273

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • Smith S.J., Roehrs C.J. (2009). High-fidelity simulation: Factors correlated with nursing student satisfaction and self-confidence. Nursing Education Perspectives, 30, 74–78.19476068

    MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • Tashakkori A., Teddlie C. (1998). Mixed methodology (vol. 46). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar
  • Walker E., Nowacki A. (2010). Understanding equivalence and noninferiority testing. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 26, 192–196.10.1007/s11606-010-1513-820857339

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

We use cookies on this site to enhance your user experience. For a complete overview of all the cookies used, please see our privacy policy.

×