Skip to main content
Journal of Nursing Education, 2021;60(2):90–95
Published Online:https://doi.org/10.3928/01484834-20210120-06Cited by:2

Abstract

Background:

Debriefing is the reflective process following the simulation experience. We aimed to compare the debriefing assessment and debriefing satisfaction perceived by nursing students who underwent different debriefing methods.

Method:

An experimental study conducted on three groups (instructor-led debriefing, peer debriefing, and combined debriefing) was performed for 177 nursing students. Differences in the debriefing satisfaction were assessed using the Clinical Experience Simulation scale, the Visual Analogue scale, and the Debriefing Assessment for Simulation in Healthcare (DASH).

Results:

VAS scores for satisfaction differed significantly between the instructor-led debriefing, peer debriefing, and combined debriefing groups. In the Clinical Experience Simulation scale, the combined debriefing group was significantly higher compared with instructor-led debriefing. The total score for DASH was significantly higher in the combined debriefing group compared with instructor-led debriefing, and in instructor-led debriefing compared with peer debriefing.

Conclusion:

Combining debriefing after a simulation session improves the debriefing satisfaction and the perceived debriefing assessment among nursing students. [J Nurs Educ. 2021;60(2):90–95.]

  • Abatzis V. T., Littlewood K. E. (2015). Debriefing in simulation and Beyond. International Anesthesiology Clinics, 53(4), 151–16210.1097/AIA.0000000000000070 PMID:26397791

    > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • Ali A. A., Miller E. T. (2018). Effectiveness of video-assisted debriefing in health education: An integrative review. Journal of Nursing Education, 57(1), 14–2010.3928/01484834-20180102-04 PMID:29381155

    > LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Baptista R. C., Paiva L. A., Gonçalves R. F., Oliveira L. M., Pereira M. F., Martins J. C. (2016). Satisfaction and gains perceived by nursing students with medium and high-fidelity simulation: A randomized controlled trial. Nurse Education Today, 46, 127–13210.1016/j.nedt.2016.08.027 PMID:27639211

    > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • Baptista Rui Carlos Negrao, Amado Martins Jose Carlos, Pereira M. F. C. R., Mazzo A. (2014). Satisfacción de los estudiantes con las experiencias clínicas simuladas: Validación de escala de evaluación [Students' satisfaction with simulated clinical experiences: validation of an assessment scale]. Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem, 22(5), 709–71510.1590/0104-1169.3295.2471 PMID:25493664

    > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • Boet S., Bould M. D., Bruppacher H. R., Desjardins F., Chandra D. B., Naik V. N. (2011). Looking in the mirror: Self-debriefing versus instructor debriefing for simulated crises. Critical Care Medicine, 39(6), 1377–138110.1097/CCM.0b013e31820eb8be PMID:21317645

    > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • Boet S., Bould M. D., Sharma B., Revees S., Naik V. N., Triby E., Grantcharov T. (2013). Within-team debriefing versus instructor-led debriefing for simulation-based education: A randomized controlled trial. Annals of Surgery, 258(1), 53–5810.1097/SLA.0b013e31829659e4 PMID:23728281

    > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • Fey M. K., Jenkins L. S. (2015). Debriefing practices in nursing education programs: Results from a national study. Nursing Education Perspectives, 36(6), 361–36610.5480/14-1520 PMID:26753294

    > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • Gaylle D. (2019). In-simulation debriefing increases therapeutic communication skills. Nurse Educator, 44(6), 295–29910.1097/NNE.0000000000000643 PMID:30640799

    > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • George T. P., Gainey K. L., Kershner S. H., Weaver D. L., Hucks J. M. (2020). Junior and senior nursing students: A near-peer simulation experience. Journal of Nursing Education, 59(1), 54–5610.3928/01484834-20191223-13 PMID:31945178

    > LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ha E.-H., Song H.-S. (2015). The effects of structured self-debriefing using on the clinical competency, self-efficacy, and educational satisfaction in nursing students after simulation. Journal of Korean Academic Society of Nursing Education, 21(4), 445–45410.5977/jkasne.2015.21.4.445

    > CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kang K., Yu M. (2018). Comparison of student self-debriefing versus instructor debriefing in nursing simulation: A quasi-experimental study. Nurse Education Today, 65, 67–7310.1016/j.nedt.2018.02.030 PMID:29533836

    > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • Kim S. S., De Gagne J. C. (2018). Instructor-led vs. peer-led debriefing in preoperative care simulation using standardized patients. Nurse Education Today, 71, 34–3910.1016/j.nedt.2018.09.001 PMID:30218850

    > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • Kim Y. J., Yoo J. H. (2020). The utilization of debriefing for simulation in healthcare: A literature review. Nurse Education in Practice, 43, 10269810.1016/j.nepr.2020.102698 PMID:32004851

    > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • Lapum J. L., Verkuyl M., Hughes M., Romaniuk D., McCulloch T., Mastrilli P. (2019). Self-debriefing in virtual simulation. Nurse Educator, 44(6), E6–E810.1097/NNE.0000000000000639 PMID:30585886

    > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • Morgan J., Green V., Blair J. (2018). Using simulation to prepare for clinical practice. The Clinical Teacher, 15(1), 57–6110.1111/tct.12631 PMID:28371049

    > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • Oikawa S., Berg B., Turban J., Vincent D., Mandai Y., Birkmire-Peters D. (2016). Self-debriefing vs instructor debriefing in a pre-internship simulation curriculum: Night on call. Hawai'i Journal of Medicine & Public Health: A Journal of Asia Pacific Medicine & Public Health, 75(5), 127–132 PMID:27239391

    > MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • Ostovar S., Allahbakhshian A., Gholizadeh L., Dizaji S. L., Sarbakhsh P., Ghahramanian A. (2018). Comparison of the effects of debriefing methods on psychomotor skills, self-confidence, and satisfaction in novice nursing students: A quasi-experimental study. Journal of Advanced Pharmaceutical Technology & Research, 9(3), 107–11210.4103/japtr.JAPTR_291_18 PMID:30338237

    > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • Padden-Denmead M. L., Scaffidi R. M., Kerley R. M., Farside A. L. (2016). Simulation with debriefing and guided reflective journaling to stimulate critical thinking in prelicensure baccalaureate degree nursing students. Journal of Nursing Education, 55(11), 645–65010.3928/01484834-20161011-07 PMID:27783819

    > LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Rudolph J. W., Simon R., Dufresne R. L., Raemer D. B. (2006). There's no such thing as “nonjudgmental” debriefing: A theory and method for debriefing with good judgment. Simulation in Healthcare, 1(1), 49–5510.1097/01266021-200600110-00006 PMID:19088574

    > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • Ryall T., Judd B. K., Gordon C. J. (2016). Simulation-based assessments in health professional education: A systematic review. Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare, 9, 69–82 PMID:26955280

    > MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • Ryoo E. N., Ha E.-H. (2015). The importance of debriefing in simulation-based learning. CIN: Computers, Informatics. Nursing, 33(12), 538–545 PMID:26587701

    > MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • Schuler M. S. (2020). Simulation debriefing using Kim's critical reflective inquiry model. Nurse Educator, 45, 272 Advance online publication. 10.1097/NNE.0000000000000819 PMID:32097241

    > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • Simon R., Raemer D., Rudolph J. (2010). Debriefing assessment for simulation in healthcare. Center for Medical Simulation.

    > Google Scholar
  • Verkuyl M., Atack L., McCulloch T., Liu L., Betts L., Lapum J. L., Hughes M., Mastrilli P., Romaniuk D. (2018). Comparison of debriefing methods after a virtual simulation: An experiment. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 19, 1–710.1016/j.ecns.2018.03.002

    > CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zentz S. E., Kurtz C. P., Alverson E. M. (2014). Undergraduate peer-assisted learning in the clinical setting. Journal of Nursing Education, 53(3), S4–S1010.3928/01484834-20140211-01 PMID:24512330

    > LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Zhang H., Mörelius E., Goh S. H. L., Wang W. (2019). Effectiveness of video-assisted debriefing in simulation-based health professions education: A systematic review of quantitative evidence. Nurse Educator, 44(3), E1–E610.1097/NNE.0000000000000562 PMID:30015683

    > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

We use cookies on this site to enhance your user experience. For a complete overview of all the cookies used, please see our privacy policy.

×