Skip to main content
Published Online:https://doi.org/10.3928/01913913-20041101-04Cited by:65

Abstract

Purpose:

To investigate the role of optical coherence tomography (OCT) in the evaluation of fundus tumors and simulating lesions in children.

Patients and Methods:

We report the results of a retrospective single-center case series of 44 eyes of 44 children younger than age 18 with fundus lesions who were evaluated with OCT. In comparison, 12 eyes of 12 children with a normal macula were evaluated with OCT. Main outcome measures were cooperation of children while undergoing OCT and correlation of OCT findings with clinical and ultrasonographic findings

Results:

The OCT was performed without difficulty in all 56 children. Mean patient age was 12 years (median, 12 years; range, 4 to 17 years). The mean horizontal foveal thickness in the 12 normal eyes was 137 µm (median, 132 µm; range, 109 to 185 µm). Clinical diagnoses included retinoblastoma in 10 (23%) eyes, Coats’ disease in 4 (9%) eyes, retinal capillary hemangioma in 3 (7%) eyes, astrocytic hamartoma of the retina in 3 (7%) eyes, toxocara granuloma in 2 (5%) eyes, and others. OCT was more sensitive than clinical examination in detection of macular pathology including shallow posterior vitreous detachment, surface wrinkling maculopathy, cystoid and noncystoid macular edema, subfoveal fluid, and retinal thinning. In comparison to ultrasonography, OCT was more sensitive in detection of surface wrinkling maculopathy, macular edema, and subfoveal fluid. Ultrasonography was more sensitive in detection of posterior vitreous detachment.

Conclusions:

OCT is a useful and well-tolerated diagnostic modality for macular evaluation in children. It is more sensitive than clinical examination and ultrasonography in the detection of surface wrinkling maculopathy, macular edema, and subfoveal fluid.

J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus 2004;41:338–344.

  • 1.Unoki K, Ohba N, Hoyt WF. Optical coherence tomography of superior segmental optic hypoplasia. Br J Ophthalmol2002; 86: 910–914.10.1136/bjo.86.8.910

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 2.Meyer CH, Lapolice DJ, Freedman SF. Foveal hypoplasia in oculocutaneous albinism demonstrated by optical coherence tomography. Am J Ophthalmol2002; 133:409–410.10.1016/S0002-9394(01)01326-5

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 3.Neubauer AS, Priglinger S, Ullrich S, et al.Comparison of foveal thickness measured with the retinal thickness analyzer and optical coherence tomography. Retina2001; 21:596–601.10.1097/00006982-200112000-00006

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 4.Liu X, Ling Y, Luo R, Ge J, Zheng X. Optical coherence tomography in measuring retinal nerve fiber layer thickness in normal subjects and patients with open-angle glaucoma. Chin Med J2001; 114:524–529.

    MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 5.Massin P, Vicaut E, Haouchine B, et al.Reproducibility of retinal mapping using optical coherence tomography. Arch Ophthalmol2001; 119:1135–1142.10.1001/archopht.119.8.1135

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 6.Alamouti B, Funk J. Retinal thickness decreases with age: an OCT study. Br J Ophthalmol2003; 87:899–901.10.1136/bjo.87.7.899

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 7.Wakitani Y, Sasoh M, Sugimoto M, et al.Macular thickness measurements in healthy subjects with different axial lengths using optical coherence tomography. Retina2003; 23:177–182.10.1097/00006982-200304000-00007

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 8.Muscat S, Srinivasan S, Sampat V, et al.Optical coherence tomography in the diagnosis of subclinical serous detachment of the macula secondary to a choroidal nevus. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers2001; 32:474–476.

    LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 9.Ting TD, McCuen BW, Fekrat S. Combined hamartoma of the retina and retinal pigment epithelium: optical coherence tomography. Retina2002; 22:98–101.10.1097/00006982-200202000-00016

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 10.Fukasawa A, Iijima H. Optical coherence tomography of choroidal osteoma. Am J Ophthalmol2002; 133:419–421.10.1016/S0002-9394(01)01336-8

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 11.Shields CL, Materin MA, Karatza E, Shields JA. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) of congenital simple hamartoma of the retinal pigment epithelium. Retina. In press.

    Google Scholar
  • 12.Schaudig U, Hassenstein A, Bernd A, et al.Limitations of imaging choroidal tumors in vivo by optical coherence tomography. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol1998; 236:588–592.10.1007/s004170050126

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 13.Puliafito CA, Hee MR, Lin CP, et al.Imaging of macular diseases with optical coherence tomography. Ophthalmology1995; 102: 217–229.10.1016/S0161-6420(95)31032-9

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 14.Pavlin CJ, Sherar MD, Foster FS. Subsurface ultrasound microscopic imaging of the intact eye. Ophthalmology1990; 97:244–250.10.1016/S0161-6420(90)32598-8

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 15.Shahidi M, Ogura Y, Blair NP, et al.Retinal thickness analysis for quantitative assessment of diabetic macular edema. Arch Ophthalmol1991; 109:1115–1119.10.1001/archopht.1991.01080080075032

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 16.Shields CL, Shields JA, Marr BP, et al.Congenital simple hamartoma of the retinal pigment epithelium: a study of five cases. Ophthalmology2003; 110:1005–1011.10.1016/S0161-6420(03)00087-3

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 17.Shields CL, Mashayekhi A, Ho T, et al.Solitary congenital hypertrophy of the retinal pigment epithelium: clinical features and frequency of enlargement in 330 patients. Ophthalmology2003; 110:1968–1976.10.1016/S0161-6420(03)00618-3

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

We use cookies on this site to enhance your user experience. For a complete overview of all the cookies used, please see our privacy policy.

×