Skip to main content
Published Online:https://doi.org/10.3928/01913913-20121002-01Cited by:5

Abstract

Purpose:

To assess anatomic outcomes following repair of traumatic retinal detachment (RD) among a cohort of cognitively impaired adolescents with self-injurious behaviors.

Methods:

Main outcome measures in this retrospective, consecutive, interventional case series were retinal attachment and postoperative complications.

Results:

Complete retinal reattachment was initially achieved in all 9 eyes of 9 patients. Six (67%) eyes had chronic RD at initial presentation, and 7 (78%) patients had limited vision from inoperable RD in the fellow eye. Proliferative vitreoretinopathy led to recurrent RD in 4 (44%) eyes at a mean of 2.7 months. Final total or partial retinal attachment was achieved in 6 (67%) and 3 (33%) eyes, respectively, with a mean of 1.7 procedures over a mean follow-up of 22.4 months. Silicone oil emulsification led to progressive glaucoma in 4 (50%) of 8 eyes in which it was used, requiring silicone oil exchange (2 eyes) or removal (2 eyes). Recurrent RD developed in both eyes from which silicone oil was removed despite prior retinal anatomic stability for more than 6 months.

Conclusion:

Cognitively impaired adolescents with self-injurious behaviors typically presented with severe visual impairment from chronic traumatic RD in one or both eyes. Despite initial anatomic success, formation of proliferative vitreoretinopathy and further ocular trauma from continued self-injurious behaviors led to a high rate of recurrent RD. Long-term silicone oil tamponade may prevent recurrent RD in this challenging scenario but is associated with vision loss from progressive glaucoma and corneal decompensation.

  • 1.McClinktok K, Hall S, Oliver C. Risk markers associated with challenging behaviours in people with intellectual disabilities: a meta-analytic study. J Intellect Disabil Res. 2003; 47:405–416.10.1046/j.1365-2788.2003.00517.x

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 2.Oliver C, Petty J, Ruddick L, Bacarese-Hamilton M. The association between repetitive, self-injurious and aggressive behavior in children with severe intellectual disability. J Autism Dev Disord. 2012; 42:910–919.10.1007/s10803-011-1320-z

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 3.Petty J, Allen D, Oliver C. Relationship among challenging, repetitive, and communicative behaviors in children with severe intellectual disabilities. Am J Intellect Dev Disabil. 2009; 114:356–368.10.1352/1944-7558-114.5.356

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 4.Matson JL, Cooper C, Malone CJ, Moskow SL. The relationship of self-injurious behavior and other maladaptive behaviors among individuals with severe and profound intellectual disability. Res Dev Disabil. 2008; 29:141–148.10.1016/j.ridd.2007.02.001

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 5.Poppes P, van der Putten AJ, Viaskamp C. Frequency and severity of challenging behaviour in people with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities. Res Dev Disabil. 2010; 31:1269–1275.10.1016/j.ridd.2010.07.017

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 6.Matson JL, Lovullo SV. A review of behavioral treatments for self-injurious behaviors of persons with autism spectrum disorders. Behav Modif. 2008; 32:61–76.10.1177/0145445507304581

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 7.Ashkenazi I, Shahar E, Brand N, Bartov E, Blumenthal M. Self-inflicted ocular mutilation in the pediatric age group. Acta Paediatr. 1992; 81:649–651.10.1111/j.1651-2227.1992.tb12323.x

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 8.Noel LP, Clarke WN. Self-inflicted ocular injuries in children. Am J Ophthalmol. 1982; 94:630–633.

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 9.Patton N. Self-inflicted eye injuries: a review. Eye. 2004; 18:867–872.10.1038/sj.eye.6701365

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 10.Sheard RM, Mireskandari K, Ezra E, Sullivan PM. Vitreoretinal surgery after childhood ocular trauma. Eye. 2007; 21:793–798.10.1038/sj.eye.6702332

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 11.Wadha N, Venkatesh P, Sampangi R, Garg S. Rhegmatogenous retinal detachments in children in India clinical characteristics, risk factors, and surgical outcomes. J AAPOS. 2008; 12:551–554.10.1016/j.jaapos.2008.05.002

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 12.Solliman MM, Macky TA. Pediatric rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Int Ophthalmol Clin. 2001; 51:147–171.10.1097/IIO.0b013e31820099c5

    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 13.Soheilian M, Ramezani A, Malihi M, et al.Clinical features and surgical outcomes of pediatric rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Retina. 2009; 29:545–551.10.1097/IAE.0b013e318194fd1a

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 14.Chen SN, Jiunn-Feng H, Te-Cheng Y. Pediatric rhegmatogenous retinal detachment in Taiwan. Retina. 2006; 26:410–414.10.1097/00006982-200604000-00005

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 15.Weinberg DV, Lyon AT, Greenwald MJ, Mets MB. Rhegmatogenous retinal detachments in children: risk factors and surgical outcomes. Ophthalmology. 2003; 110:1708–1713.10.1016/S0161-6420(03)00569-4

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 16.Yoon YH, Marmor MF. Rapid enhancement of retinal adhesion by laser photocoagulation. Ophthalmology. 1988; 95:1385–1388.

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

We use cookies on this site to enhance your user experience. For a complete overview of all the cookies used, please see our privacy policy.

×