Skip to main content
Published Online:https://doi.org/10.3928/01913913-20130903-01Cited by:9

Abstract

Purpose:

To evaluate the risk factors predicting surgical treatment in consecutive esotropia occurring after surgery for intermittent exotropia.

Methods:

The clinical records of 52 patients with consecutive esotropia who underwent exotropia surgery were retrospectively reviewed. All patients demonstrated consecutive esotropia with diplopia or suppression for more than 1 month after surgery for exotropia. Patients were divided into two groups (the surgical group and nonsurgical group) depending on whether surgery was required for consecutive esotropia. Surgery for esotropia was performed only in patients with more than 10 prism diopters (PD) esodeviation that persisted for a minimum of 6 months, those who had suppression in 1 eye or diplopia, and those who could not achieve fine stereopsis. The nonsurgical treatment up to 6 months postoperatively was part-time patching and prism therapy in both groups. Patient characteristics were evaluated in the two groups.

Results:

The surgical group was composed of 17 patients and the nonsurgical group was composed of 35 patients. Age, gender, refractive error, best-corrected visual acuity, and postoperative overcorrection at 1 day were not significantly different in the two groups (P > .05). However, the distance strabismic angle at 1 month postoperatively was 2.5 ± 3.8 PD esodeviation (range: 14 PD esotropia to 4 PD exotropia) in the nonsurgical group and 5.4 ± 5.1 PD esodeviation (range: 20 PD esotropia to orthotropia) in the surgical group; these values were statistically significant (P < .05).

Conclusions:

The clinically significant risk factor affecting the surgical decision for consecutive esotropia was a large esotropic angle at 1 month postoperatively in this study.

[J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus 2013;50(6):335–339.]

  • 1.Santiago AP, Ing MR, Kushner BJ, Rosenbaum AL. Intermittent exotropia. In: , Rosenbaum A, Santiago AP, eds. Clinical Strabismus Management: Principles and Surgical Techniques.Philadelphia: Saunders; 1999:163–175.

    Google Scholar
  • 2.Burian HM, Spivey BE. The surgical management of exodeviations. Am J Ophthalmol. 1965; 59:603–620.

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 3.Hardesty HH, Bonyton JR, Keenan JP. Treatment of intermittent exotropia. Arch Ophthalmol. 1978; 96:268–274.10.1001/archopht.1978.03910050136006

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 4.Cho YA, Kim SH. Role of the equator in the early overcorrection of intermittent exotropia. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 2009; 46:30–34.10.3928/01913913-20090101-04

    LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 5.von Noorden GK, Campos EC. Exodeviations. In: , von Noorden GK, Campos EC. Binocular Vision and Ocular Motility: Theory and Management of Strabismus, 6th ed. St. Louis: CV Mosby; 2002:371–372.

    Google Scholar
  • 6.Elsas FJ. Consecutive esotropia. Am Orthopt J. 1992; 42:94–97.

    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 7.Raab EL, Parks MM. Recession of the lateral recti: early and late postoperative alignments. Arch Ophthalmol. 1969: 82:203–208.10.1001/archopht.1969.00990020205010

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 8.Burian HM. Exodeviations: their classification, diagnosis and treatment. Am J Ophthalmol. 1966; 62:1161–1166.

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 9.Edelman PM, Brown MH, Murphree AL, Wright KW. Consecutive esodeviation, then what?Am Orthopt J. 1988; 38:111–116.

    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 10.Jang JH, Park JM, Lee SJ. Factors predisposing to consecutive esotropia after surgery to correct intermittent exotropia. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2012; 250:1485–1490.10.1007/s00417-012-1991-y

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 11.Keech RV, Stewart SA. The surgical overcorrection of intermittent exotropia. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 1990; 27:218–220.

    LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 12.Hardesty HH. Treatment of overcorrected intermittent exotropia. Am J Ophthalmol. 1968; 66:80–86.

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 13.Richard JM, Parks MM. Intermittent exotropia: surgical results in different age groups. Ophthalmology. 1983; 90:1172–1177.10.1016/S0161-6420(83)34410-9

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 14.Pratt-Johnson JA, Barlow JM, Tilson G. Early surgery in intermittent exotropia. Am J Ophthalmol. 1977; 84:689–694.

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 15.Ruttum MS. Initial versus subsequent postoperative motor alignment in intermittent exotropia. J AAPOS. 1997; 1:88–91.10.1016/S1091-8531(97)90004-5

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 16.Scott WE, Keech R, Mash AJ. The postoperative results and stability of exodeviations. Arch Ophthalmol. 1981; 99:1814–1818.10.1001/archopht.1981.03930020688013

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 17.Jampolsky A. Treatment of exodeviations. Trans New Orleans Acad Ophthalmol. 1986; 34:201–234.

    MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 18.Hiles DA, Davies GT, Constenbader FD. Long-term observations on unoperated exotropia. Arch Ophthalmol. 1968; 80:136–142.10.1001/archopht.1968.00980050438006

    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 19.Parks MM. Comitant exodeviations in children. In: Strabismus: Symposium of the New Orleans Academy of Ophthalmology.St. Louis: CV Mosby; 1962;31–55.

    Google Scholar
  • 20.Moore S. The prognostic value of lateral gaze measurements in intermittent exotropia. Am Orthopt J. 1969; 19:69–71.

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

We use cookies on this site to enhance your user experience. For a complete overview of all the cookies used, please see our privacy policy.

×