Skip to main content
Published Online:https://doi.org/10.3928/01913913-20150311-11Cited by:12

Abstract

Purpose:

To compare the subfoveal, parafoveal, and peripapillary choroidal thickness in amblyopic eyes with those of fellow and control eyes.

Methods:

This institutional study involved 114 eyes from 38 patients with unilateral amblyopia and 19 healthy children, aged 6 to 17 years. The cause of amblyopia was identified as hyperopic anisometropia in 17 cases and strabismus in 21 cases. All patients underwent central macular thickness (CMT) and choroidal thickness measurement at seven retinal sites with spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (OCT). Statistical analysis was performed to compare the CMT and choroidal thickness of amblyopic and fellow eyes with control eyes.

Results:

Average CMT was 248.31 ± 24.18 µm in amblyopic eyes, 249.76 ± 26.08 µm in fellow eyes, and 243.65 ± 31.96 µm in controls (P = .604). Average subfoveal choroidal thickness was 394.15 ± 71.03 µm in amblyopic eyes, 356.07 ± 79.93 µm in fellow eyes, and 319.44 ± 87.29 µm in controls (P = .000). The choroidal thickness of the subfoveal area and at 750-µm intervals temporal and nasal to the fovea was significantly thicker in amblyopic eyes than in controls (P < .05). The choroidal thickness was significantly thicker in amblyopic eyes than in fellow eyes only at 750 µm nasal to the fovea. Type and depth of amblyopia did not differ significantly between foveal or parafoveal choroidal thickness (P > .05). There was a significant negative correlation between the nasal peripapillary choroidal thickness and the axial length in the amblyopic eyes (r = −0.37, P = .022). The choroidal thickness in the peripapillary area was not significantly different in the three groups (P > .05).

Conclusions:

This study demonstrated that choroidal thickness can be measured by spectral-domain OCT in children with amblyopia. Subfoveal choroidal thickness in amblyopic eyes was significantly thicker than in control eyes. The amblyopic process may involve the choroid, but not the macula. However, further evaluation is needed.

[J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 2015;52(3):159–166.]

  • 1.Bradley A, Freeman RD. Contrast sensitivity in anisometropic amblyopia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1981; 21:467–476.

    MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 2.The Multi-ethnic Pediatric Eye Disease Group. Prevalence of amblyopia and strabismus in African American and Hispanic children ages 6 to 72 months: The Multi-ethnic Pediatric Eye Disease Study. Ophthalmology. 2008; 115:1229–1236.10.1016/j.ophtha.2007.08.001

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 3.von Noorden GK. Amblyopia: a multidisciplinary approach. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1985; 26:1704–1716.

    MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 4.Lempert P. Optic nerve hypoplasia and small eyes in presumed amblyopia. J AAPOS. 2000; 4:258–266.10.1067/mpa.2000.106963

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 5.Lempert P, Porter L. Dysversion of the optic disc and axial length measurements in a presumed amblyopic population. J AAPOS. 1998; 2:207–213.10.1016/S1091-8531(98)90054-4

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 6.von Noorden GK, Crawford ML. The lateral geniculate nucleus in human strabismic amblyopia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1992; 33:2729–2732.

    MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 7.Goel BS, Mittal SK. Experimental amblyopia in kitten: II. Histological changes in the lateral geniculate nucleus (L.G.N.) in experimentally induced strabismic amblyopia. Indian J Ophthalmol. 1983; 31:301–306.

    MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 8.von Noorden GK, Crawford ML. The effects of total unilateral occlusion vs. lid suture on the visual system of infant monkeys. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1981; 21:142–146.

    MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 9.Park KA, Park DY, Oh SY. Analysis of spectral-domain optical coherence tomography measurements in amblyopia: a pilot study. Br J Ophthalmol. 2011; 95:1700–1706.10.1136/bjo.2010.192765

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 10.Al-Haddad CE, Mollayess GM, Cherfan CG, Jaafar DF, Bashshur ZF. Retinal nerve fibre layer and macular thickness in amblyopia as measured by spectral-domain optical coherence tomography. Br J Ophthalmol. 2011; 95:1696–1699.10.1136/bjo.2010.195081

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 11.Kee SY, Lee SY, Lee YC. Thicknesses of the fovea and retinal nerve fiber layer in amblyopic and normal eyes in children. Korean J Ophthalmol. 2006; 20:177–181.10.3341/kjo.2006.20.3.177

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 12.Altintas O, Yüksel N, Ozkan B, Caglar Y. Thickness of the retinal nerve fiber layer, macular thickness, and macular volume in patients with strabismic amblyopia. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 2005; 42:216–221.

    LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 13.Dickmann A, Petroni S, Salerni A, Dell’Omo R, Balestrazzi E. Unilateral amblyopia: an optical coherence tomography study. J AAPOS. 2009; 13:148–150.10.1016/j.jaapos.2008.10.009

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 14.Yoon SW, Park WH, Baek SH, Kong SM. Thicknesses of macular retinal layer and peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer in patients with hyperopic anisometropic amblyopia. Korean J Ophthalmol. 2005; 19:62–67.10.3341/kjo.2005.19.1.62

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 15.Spaide RF, Koizumi H, Pozzoni MC. Enhanced depth imaging spectral-domain optical coherence tomography. Am J Ophthalmol. 2008; 146:496–500.10.1016/j.ajo.2008.05.032

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 16.Imamura Y, Fujiwara T, Margolis R, Spaide RF. Enhanced depth imaging optical coherence tomography of the choroid in central serous chorioretinopathy. Retina. 2009; 29:1469–1473.10.1097/IAE.0b013e3181be0a83

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 17.Maruko I, Iida T, Sugano Y, Ojima A, Ogasawara M, Spaide RF. Subfoveal choroidal thickness after treatment of central serous chorioretinopathy. Ophthalmology. 2010; 117:1792–1799.10.1016/j.ophtha.2010.01.023

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 18.Chung SE, Kang SW, Lee JH, Kim YT. Choroidal thickness in polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy and exudative age-related macular degeneration. Ophthalmology. 2011; 118:840–845.10.1016/j.ophtha.2010.09.012

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 19.Imamura Y, Iida T, Maruko I, Zweifel SA, Spaide RF. Enhanced depth imaging optical coherence tomography of the sclera in dome-shaped macula. Am J Ophthalmol. 2011; 151:297–302.10.1016/j.ajo.2010.08.014

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 20.Spaide RF. Age-related choroidal atrophy. Am J Ophthalmol. 2009; 147:801–810.10.1016/j.ajo.2008.12.010

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 21.Fong AHC, Li KK, Wong D. Choroidal evaluation using enhanced depth imaging spectral-domain optical coherence tomography in Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada disease. Retina. 2011; 31:502–509.10.1097/IAE.0b013e3182083beb

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 22.Reibaldi M, Boscia F, Avitabile T, et al.Enhanced depth optical coherence tomography of choroid in idiopathic macular hole: a cross-sectional prospective study. Am J Ophthalmol. 2011; 151:112–117.10.1016/j.ajo.2010.07.004

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 23.Campos EC, Schiavi C, Baldi A. Does amblyopia protect against age-related maculopathy?Int Ophthalmol. 1998; 22:193–194.10.1023/A:1006242808142

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 24.Hess RF. Amblyopia: site unseen. Clin Exp Optom. 2001; 84:321–336.10.1111/j.1444-0938.2001.tb06604.x

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 25.Kiorpes L, Kiper DC, O’Keefe LP, Cavanaugh JR, Movshon JA. Neuronal correlates of amblyopia in the visual cortex of macaque monkeys with experimental strabismus and anisometropia. J Neuroscience. 1998; 18:6411–6424.

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 26.Friedmann Z, Neumann E, Hyams SW, Peleg B. Ophthalmic screening of 38,000 children, age 1 to 2½ years, in child welfare clinics. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 1980; 17:261–267.

    LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 27.Wiesel TN, Hubel DH. Effects of visual deprivation on morphology and physiology of cells in the cat’s lateral geniculate body. J Neurophysiol. 1963; 26:978–993.

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 28.Baddini-Caramelli C, Hatanaka M, Polati M, Umino AT, Susanna R. Thickness of the retinal nerve fiber layer in amblyopic and normal eyes: a scanning laser polarimetry study. J AAPOS. 2001; 5:82–84.10.1067/mpa.2001.112678

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 29.Wendell-Smith CP. Effect of light deprivation on the postnatal development of the optic nerve. Nature. 1964; 204:707.10.1038/204707a0

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 30.Chow KL. Failure to demonstrate changes in the visual system of monkeys kept in darkness or colored light. J Comp Neurol. 1955; 102:597–606.10.1002/cne.901020303

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 31.Wallman J, Wildsoet C, Xu A, et al.Moving the retina: choroidal modulation of refractive state. Vision Res. 1995; 35:37–50.10.1016/0042-6989(94)E0049-Q

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 32.Leguire LE, Rogers GL, Bremer DL. Amblyopia: the normal eye is not normal. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 1990; 27:32–38.

    LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 33.Giaschi DE, Regan D, Kraft SP, Hong XH. Defective processing of motion-defined form in the fellow eye of patients with unilateral amblyopia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1992; 33:2483–2489.

    MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 34.Chatzistefanou KI, Theodossiadis GP, Damanakis AG, Ladas ID, Moschos MN, Chimonidou E. Contrast sensitivity in amblyopia: the fellow eye of untreated and successfully treated amblyopes. J AAPOS. 2005; 9:468–474.10.1016/j.jaapos.2005.05.002

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 35.Tugcu B, Araz-Ersan B, Kilic M, Erdogan ET, Yigit U, Karamürsel S. The morpho-functional evaluation of retina in amblyopia. Curr Eye Res. 2013; 38:802–809.10.3109/02713683.2013.779721

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 36.Margolis R, Spaide RF. A pilot study of enhanced depth imaging optical coherence tomography of the choroid in normal eyes. Am J Ophthalmol. 2009; 147:811–815.10.1016/j.ajo.2008.12.008

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 37.Rahman W, Chen FK, Yeoh J, Patel P, Tufail A, Da Cruz L. Repeatability of manual subfoveal choroidal thickness measurements in healthy subjects using the technique of enhanced depth imaging optical coherence tomography. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011; 52:2267–2271.10.1167/iovs.10-6024

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 38.Nishi T, Ueda T, Hasegawa T, Miyata K, Ogata N. Choroidal thickness in children with hyperopic anisometropic amblyopia. Br J Ophthalmol. 2014; 98:228–232.

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 39.Read SA, Collins MJ, Vincent SJ, Alonso-Caneiro D. Choroidal thickness in childhood. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013; 54:3586–3593.10.1167/iovs.13-11732

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 40.Bidaut-Garnier M, Schwartz C, Puyraveau M, Montard M, Delbosc B, Saleh M. Choroidal thickness measurement in children using optical coherence tomography. Retina. 2014; 34:768–774.

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 41.Ruiz-Moreno JM, Flores-Moreno I, Lugo F, Ruiz-Medrano J, Montero JA, Akiba M. Macular choroidal thickness in normal pediatric population measured by swept-source optical coherence tomography. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013; 54:353–359.10.1167/iovs.12-10863

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

We use cookies on this site to enhance your user experience. For a complete overview of all the cookies used, please see our privacy policy.

×