The goal of this study was to establish normative values for measurements of quantitative pupillometry in children.
Quantitative pupillometry measurements were obtained from children between 1 and 18 years of age being seen for either a well child check or other outpatient appointment.
Maximum and minimum pupil size increased slightly with age; however, the correlation was weak (r = 0.29 and 0.19, respectively). Similarly weak correlations with age also were observed for maximum constriction velocity (r = −0.29) and dilation velocity (r = 0.27). Maximum (5.56 vs 4.97 mm) and minimum (3.74 vs 3.40 mm) pupil sizes were significantly larger in whites than in African Americans.
Pupil size and reactivity show little correlation with age and are therefore suitable for further exploration in using pupillometry as a biomarker across the pediatric age range. Differences in race should be taken into consideration when pupillometry is used in mixed populations.
[J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 2015:52(3):147–151.]
- 1.Chamoun RB, Robertson CS, Gopinath SP. Outcome in patients with blunt head trauma and Glasgow Coma Scale score of 3 at presentation. J Neurosurg. 2009; 111:683–687.
10.3171/2009.2.JNS08817Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
- 2.Benziger DP, Miotto J, Grandy RP, Thomas GB, Swanton RE, Fitzmartin RD. A pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic study of controlled-release oxycodone. J Pain Symptom Manage. 1997; 13:75–82.
10.1016/S0885-3924(96)00300-4Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
- 3.Cury MR, Martinez FE, Carlotti AP. Pain assessment in neonates and infants in the post-operative period following cardiac surgery. Postgrad Med J. 2013; 89:63–67.
10.1136/postgradmedj-2012-130808Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
- 4.Ibrahim AE, Feldman J, Karim A, Kharasch ED. Simultaneous assessment of drug interactions with low- and high-extraction opioids: application to parecoxib effects on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of fentanyl and alfentanil. Anesthesiology. 2003; 98:853–61.
10.1097/00000542-200304000-00011Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
- 5.Macleod DB, Habib AS, Ikeda K, Inhaled fentanyl aerosol in healthy volunteers: pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. Anesth Analg. 2012; 115:1071–1077.
10.1213/ANE.0b013e3182691898Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
- 6.Matouskova O, Slanar O, Chytil L, Pupillometry in healthy volunteers as a biomarker of tramadol efficacy. J Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2011; 36:513–517.
10.1111/j.1365-2710.2010.01203.xCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
- 7.Phimmasone S, Kharasch ED. A pilot evaluation of alfentanil-induced miosis as a noninvasive probe for hepatic cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP3A4) activity in humans. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2001; 70:505–517.
10.1067/mcp.2001.119994Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
- 8.Meeker M, Du R, Bacchetti P, Pupil examination: validity and clinical utility of an automated pupillometer. J Neurosci Nurs. 2005; 37:34–40.
10.1097/01376517-200502000-00006Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
- 9.Aissou M, Snauwaert A, Dupuis C, Atchabahian A, Aubrun F, Beaussier M. Objective assessment of the immediate postoperative analgesia using pupillary reflex measurement: a prospective and observational study. Anesthesiology. 2012; 116:1006–1012.
10.1097/ALN.0b013e318251d1fbCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
- 10.Barvais L, Engelman E, Eba JM, Coussaert E, Cantraine F, Kenny GN. Effect site concentrations of remifentanil and pupil response to noxious stimulation. Br J Anaesth. 2003; 91:347–352.
10.1093/bja/aeg178Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
- 11.Constant I, Nghe MC, Boudet L, Reflex pupillary dilatation in response to skin incision and alfentanil in children anaesthetized with sevoflurane: a more sensitive measure of noxious stimulation than the commonly used variables. Br J Anaesth. 2006; 96:614–619.
10.1093/bja/ael073Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
- 12.Neville K, Connelly M. Pupillometry: a pharmacodynamic tool to measure opioid analgesia in pediatrics. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2010; 87:S65–S66. MedlineGoogle Scholar
- 13.Boev AN, Fountas KN, Karampelas I, Quantitative pupillometry: normative data in healthy pediatric volunteers. J Neurosurg. 2005; 103(6 suppl pediatrics):496–500. MedlineGoogle Scholar
- 14.Kohnen EM, Zubcov AA, Kohnen T. Scotopic pupil size in a normal pediatric population using infrared pupillometry. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2004; 242:18–23.
10.1007/s00417-003-0735-4Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
- 15.Machlachlan M, Howland H. Normal values and standard deviations for pupil diameter and interpupillary distance in subjects aged 1 month to 19 years. Ophthal Physiol Opt. 2002; 22:175–182.
10.1046/j.1475-1313.2002.00023.xCrossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
- 16.Taylor WR, Chen JW, Meltzer H, Quantitative pupillometry, a new technology: normative data and preliminary observations in patients with acute head injury. J Neurosurg. 2003; 98:205–213.
10.3171/jns.2003.98.1.0205Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
- 17.Eustis HS, Guthrie ME. Normal development: postnatal development. In: , eds. Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus. New York: Oxford UP; 2012:60–61. Google Scholar