Skip to main content
Published Online:https://doi.org/10.3928/01913913-20200331-02Cited by:3

Abstract

Purpose:

To determine the accuracy of the Spot Vision Screener (Welch Allyn, Skaneateles Falls, NY) in children 6 years and older and recommend device thresholds to improve its accuracy for the detection of refractive error.

Methods:

The Spot Vision Screener results were compared with three gold standard conditions of increasingly narrow refractive error criterion. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of the Spot Vision Screener in detecting each gold standard criterion were calculated. The most accurate threshold setting for each parameter was identified by calculating the area under the curve receiver operating characteristic.

Results:

The Spot Vision Screener was able to successfully evaluate 313 of 330 children (95%). The sensitivity of the Spot Vision Screener to detect American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus guidelines for amblyopia risk factors was 89.5% and the specificity was 76.7%. The sensitivity decreased to 80% and the specificity increased to 75.3% with narrower refractive criteria. The sensitivity in detecting refractive criteria improved with the proposed optimized device thresholds. Estimates for the general population indicate that the positive predictive value is reasonable at 52.3% to 61.8%, depending on the stringency of the criteria, with excellent negative predictive values.

Conclusions:

In school-aged children, the primary screening focus shifts from preventing amblyopia to detecting visual disturbances, including refractive error, that may interfere with academic performance. In this age group, the Spot Vision Screener was an acceptable method of detecting significant refractive error with improved sensitivity with threshold optimization.

[J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 2020;57(3):146–153.]

  • 1.Donahue SP, Baker CNCommittee on Practice and Ambulatory Medicine, American Academy of Pediatrics; Section on Ophthalmology, American Academy of Pediatrics; American Association of Certified Orthoptists; American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus; American Academy of Ophthalmology. Procedures for the Evaluation of the Visual System by Pediatricians. Pediatrics. 2016; 137(1):e20153597.10.1542/peds.2015-3597

    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 2.Donahue SP, Nixon CN, Baker CN, et al.Section on Ophthalmology, American Academy of Pediatrics; Committee on Practice and Ambulatory Medicine, American Academy of Pediatrics; American Academy of Ophthalmology; American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and StrabismusAmerican Association of Certified Orthoptists. Visual System Assessment in Infants, Children, and Young Adults by Pediatricians. Pediatrics. 2016; 137(1):28–30.10.1542/peds.2015-3596

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 3.Nottingham Chaplin PK, Baldonado K, Hutchinson A, Moore B. Vision and eye health: moving into the digital age with instrument-based vision screening. NASN Sch Nurse. 2015; 30(3):154–160.10.1177/1942602X15581054

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 4.Garry GA, Donahue SP. Validation of Spot screening device for amblyopia risk factors. J AAPOS. 2014; 18(5):476–480.10.1016/j.jaapos.2014.07.156

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 5.Silbert DI, Matta NS. Performance of the Spot vision screener for the detection of amblyopia risk factors in children. J AAPOS. 2014; 18(2):169–172.10.1016/j.jaapos.2013.11.019

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 6.Peterseim MM, Papa CE, Wilson ME, et al.The effectiveness of the Spot Vision Screener in detecting amblyopia risk factors. J AAPOS. 2014; 18(6):539–542.10.1016/j.jaapos.2014.07.176

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 7.Forcina BD, Peterseim MM, Wilson ME, et al.Performance of the Spot Vision Screener in children younger than 3 years of age. Am J Ophthalmol. 2017; 178:79–83.10.1016/j.ajo.2017.03.014

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 8.Peterseim MMW, Rhodes RS, Patel RN, et al.Effectiveness of the GoCheck Kids Vision Screener in detecting amblyopia risk factors. Am J Ophthalmol. 2018; 187:87–91.10.1016/j.ajo.2017.12.020

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 9.National Association of School Nurses. Evidence-based Vision Screening Tools and Procedures. Published 2019. Accessed January 14, 2020. https://www.nasn.org/nasn-resources/practice-topics/vision-health.

    Google Scholar
  • 10.Welch Allyn. Spot Vision Screener. Accessed January 20, 2020. https://www.welchallyn.com/en/products/categories/physical-exam/eye-exam/vision-screeners/spot-vision-screener.html

    Google Scholar
  • 11.Arana Mendez M, Arguello L, Martinez J, et al.Evaluation of the Spot Vision Screener in young children in Costa Rica. J AAPOS. 2015; 19(5):441–444.10.1016/j.jaapos.2015.08.002

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 12.Feldman S, Peterseim MMW, Trivedi RH, Edward Wilson M, Cheeseman EW, Papa CE. Detecting high hyperopia: the Plus Lens Test and the Spot Vision Screener. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 2017; 54(3):163–167.10.3928/01913913-20161013-05

    LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 13.Welch Allyn. Welch Allyn Spot Vision Screener Model VS100. Directions for use. Software version 3.1XX. Accessed February 9, 2019. https://wwwwelchallyncom/content/dam/welchallyn/documents/sap-documents/LIT/80024/80024271LITPDFpdf

    Google Scholar
  • 14.Donahue SP, Arthur B, Neely DE, et al.POS Vision Screening Committee. Guidelines for automated preschool vision screening: a 10-year, evidence-based update. J AAPOS. 2013; 17(1):4–8.10.1016/j.jaapos.2012.09.012

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 15.Prevent Blindness position statement on school-aged vision screeening and eye health programs. Published 2015. Accessed February 9, 2019. www.preventblindness.org

    Google Scholar
  • 16.Altman DG, Bland JM. Diagnostic tests 1: sensitivity and specificity. BMJ. 1994; 308(6943):1552.10.1136/bmj.308.6943.1552

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 17.Altman DG, Bland JM. Diagnostic tests 2: predictive values. BMJ. 1994; 309(6947):102.10.1136/bmj.309.6947.102

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 18.Ferebee A. Childhood Vision: Public Challenges and Opportunities: A Policy Brief. The Center for Health and Health Care in Schools. School of Public Health and Health Services, The George Washington University Medical Center. Published 2004. Accessed January 20, 2020. http://www.healthinschools.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/visionfinal.pdf

    Google Scholar
  • 19.Prince Nelson SL, Ramakrishnan V, Nietert PJ, Kamen DL, Ramos PS, Wolf BJAn evaluation of common methods for dichotomization of continuous variables to discriminate disease status. Communications in Statistics: Theory and Methods. 2017; 46(21):10823–10834.

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 20.Barugel R, Touhami S, Samama S, et al.Evaluation of the Spot Vision Screener for children with limited access to ocular health care. J AAPOS. 2019; 23:153e151–155.10.1016/j.jaapos.2018.09.012

    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 21.Bennett KP, Maloney W. Weighing in on Canadian school-based vision screening: a call for action. Can J Public Health. 2017; 108(4):e421–e426.10.17269/CJPH.108.6062

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 22.Yu H, Shao Y, Yuan H, Yan B. Age-determined referral criteria of myopia for large-scale vision screening. Eye Sci. 2015; 30(4):151–155.

    MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 23.Tong L, Saw SM, Tan D, et al.Sensitivity and specificity of visual acuity screening for refractive errors in school children. Optom Vis Sci. 2002; 79(10):650–657.10.1097/00006324-200210000-00011

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 24.Silbert DI, Matta NS, Brubaker A. Flip chart visual acuity screening for amblyopia risk factors compared to the PlusoptiX A09 photoscreener: tests performed by a lay screener. Binocul Vis Strabolog Q Simms Romano. 2013; 28(4):222–228.

    MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 25.Washington State Legislature. 246–760-071 Required and alternative vision screening tools and referral criteria. Published 2017. Accessed January 20, 2020. https://sboh.wa.gov/Portals/7/Doc/VisionScreening/VisionScreeningToolsforWashingtonState-Schools.pdf

    Google Scholar
  • 26.Tuitt K. Lions Club vision screener hits school-age roadblock. Published 2017. Accessed January 20, 2020. https://www.lowell-sun.com/2017/04/10/lions-club-vision-screener-hits-school-age-roadblock/

    Google Scholar
  • 27.Burgettstown Middle/High School, Nurse. Accessed January 14, 2020. https://www.burgettstown.k12.pa.us/Page/2938.

    Google Scholar
  • 28.Bourne R, Resnikoff R, Ackland P. Global Cause Estimates: The causes of Global Distance Loss IAPB Vision Atlas. Accessed January 20, 2020. http://atlas.iapb.org/global-burden-vision-impairment/gbvi-global-cause-estimates/

    Google Scholar

We use cookies on this site to enhance your user experience. For a complete overview of all the cookies used, please see our privacy policy.

×