Abstract
This article defines wisdom and despair as choices for cognitively intact older adults. Some individuals are able to integrate the conditions of old age while others respond in ways that inhibit effective integration. The conscious aging theory, as well as Erikson’s developmental theory regarding achievement of integrity/wisdom, provides a theoretical basis for exploration of this topic. Constructs of personality, including self-concept, self-acceptance, destiny control, interiority, rigidity, and flexibility, are described. Finally, guidelines for nurses working with older adults who are facing this developmental stage of life are provided.
- Aiken L.R. (1989). Later life (3rd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Google Scholar
- Ardelt M. (1997).Wisdom and life satisfaction in old age. Journals of Gerontology. Series B, Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 52, P15–P27. Crossref, Google Scholar
- Atchley R.C. (1999). Continuity and adaptation in aging: Creating positive experiences. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. Google Scholar
- Bianchi E. (2005). Living with elder wisdom. Journal of Gerontological Social Work, 45, 319–329.
10.1300/J083v45n03_06 Crossref Medline, Google Scholar - Brugman G.M. (2006). Wisdom and aging. In (Eds.), Handbook of the psychology of aging (6th ed., pp. 445–469). Burlington, MA: Elsevier. Crossref, Google Scholar
- Erikson E.H. (1959). Identity and the life cycle. New York: International Universities Press. Google Scholar
- Ronch J.L., Goldfield J.A. (2003). Mental wellness in aging: Strengths-based approaches. Baltimore: Health Professions Press. Google Scholar
- Rowe J.W., Kahn R.L. (1998). Successful aging. New York: Dell. Google Scholar
