Skip to main content
Published Online:https://doi.org/10.3928/02793695-20130628-02Cited by:1

Abstract

Differences in electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) outcomes were explored following changes in ECT administration at our institution. Two changes were introduced: (a) switching the anesthetic agent from propofol to methohexital, and (b) using a more aggressive ECT charge dosing regimen for right unilateral (RUL) electrode placement. Length of stay (LOS) and number of treatments administered per patient were monitored. A retrospective analysis was performed of two inpatient groups treated on our Mood Disorders Unit: those who underwent ECT in the 12 months prior to the changes (n = 40) and those who underwent treatment in the 12 months after the changes (n = 38). Compared with patients receiving ECT with RUL placement prior to the changes, patients who received RUL ECT after the changes had a significantly shorter inpatient LOS (27.4 versus 18 days, p = 0.028). Treatment efficacy monitored by the Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale was not impacted. The change in anesthetic agent and charge dosing each accounted for 11% of the variance in LOS among patients receiving RUL ECT. The implemented changes in ECT administration positively impacted outcome for patients receiving treatment with RUL electrode placement. [Journal of Psychosocial Nursing and Mental Health Services, 51(11), 20–25.]

  • Abrams R. (2002). Stimulus titration and ECT dosing. Journal of ECT, 18, 3–9.10.1097/00124509-200203000-00002

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • Avramov M.N., Husain M.M., White P.F. (1995). The comparative effects of methohexital, propofol, and etomidate for electro-convulsive therapy. Anesthesia and Analgesia, 81, 596–602.

    MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • Fear C.F., Littlejohns C.S., Rouse E., Mc-Quail P. (1994). Propofol anaesthesia in electroconvulsive therapy. Reduced seizure duration may not be relevant. British Journal of Psychiatry, 165, 506–509.10.1192/bjp.165.4.506

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • Fredman B., d’Etienne J., Smith I., Husain M.M., White P.F. (1994). Anesthesia for electroconvulsive therapy: Effects of propofol and methohexital on seizure activity and recovery. Anesthesia and Analgesia, 79, 75–79.10.1213/00000539-199407000-00014

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • Kavanagh A., McLoughlin D.M. (2010). Electroconvulsive therapy and nursing care. British Journal of Nursing, 18, 1370, 1372, 1374–1377.

    Google Scholar
  • Loo C.K., Sainsbury K., Sheehan P., Lyndon B. (2008). A comparison of RUL ultrabrief pulse (0.3 ms) ECT and standard RUL ECT. International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology, 11, 883–890.10.1017/S1461145708009292

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • Malsch E., Gratz I., Mani S., Backup C., Levy S., Allen E. (1994). Efficacy of electroconvulsive therapy after propofol and methohexital anesthesia. Convulsive Therapy, 10, 212–219.

    MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • McCall W.V., Reid S., Ford M. (1994). Electrocardiographic and cardiovascular effects of subconvulsive stimulation during titrated right unilateral ECT. Convulsive Therapy, 10, 25–33.

    MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • Montgomery S.A., Asberg M. (1979). A new depression scale designed to be sensitive to change. British Journal of Psychiatry, 134, 382–389.10.1192/bjp.134.4.382

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • Rampton A.J., Griffin R.M., Stuart C.S., Durcan J.J., Huddy N.C., Abbott M.A. (1989). Comparison of methohexital and propofol for electroconvulsive therapy: Effects on hemodynamic responses and seizure duration. Anesthesiology, 70, 412–417.10.1097/00000542-198903000-00008

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • Roemer R.A., Dubin W.R., Jaffe R., Lipschutz L., Sharon D. (1990). An efficacy study of single-versus double-seizure induction with ECT in major depression. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 51, 473–478.

    MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • Rosedale M. (2011). Our patients’ lives are worth fighting for and electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) saves lives: A compendium of the evidence. Journal of the American Psychiatric Nurses Association, 17, 209–211.10.1177/1078390311407668

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • Sackeim H.A., Prudic J., Devanand D.P., Nobler M.S., Lisanby S.H., Peyser S., Clark J. (2000). A prospective, randomized, double-blind comparison of bilateral and right unilateral electroconvulsive therapy at different stimulus intensities. Archives of General Psychiatry, 57, 425–434.10.1001/archpsyc.57.5.425

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • Vaidya P.V., Anderson E.L., Bobb A., Pulia K., Jayaram G., Reti I. (2012). A within-subject comparison of propofol and methohexital anesthesia for electroconvulsive therapy. Journal of ECT, 28, 14–19.10.1097/YCT.0b013e31823a4220

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

We use cookies on this site to enhance your user experience. For a complete overview of all the cookies used, please see our privacy policy.

×