Skip to main content
Journal of Refractive Surgery, 2009;25(7):569–577
Cite this articlePublished Online:https://doi.org/10.3928/1081597X-20090610-02Cited by:56

Abstract

Purpose:

To determine the 1-year stability of LASIK in corneas with topographic suspect keratoconus confirmed as non-keratoconic by epithelial thickness mapping.

Methods:

This was a retrospective case/control comparative study. Eyes suspected of keratoconus using criteria based mainly on Atlas (Carl Zeiss Meditec AG) and Orbscan II (Bausch & Lomb) topography were scanned by Artemis very high-frequency digital ultrasound (ArcScan Inc). Keratoconus was confirmed if the epithelial thickness profile showed relative epithelial thinning coincident with an eccentric posterior elevation best-fit sphere apex. Laser in situ keratomileusis was performed in all eyes where keratoconus was excluded by finding relatively thicker epithelium or not finding localized thinning over the topographically suspected cone. Patients were followed for 1 year after LASIK. A control group was generated matched within 0.50 diopter (D) for sphere, cylinder, and spherical equivalent refraction (SEQ) to compare refractive stability.

Results:

The average change in SEQ between 3 and 12 months was −0.10±0.30 D for the suspect keratoconus group and −0.10±0.28 D for controls. No statistically significant difference in shift from 3 months to 12 months in SEQ or cylinder between groups was noted. No statistically significant change in best spectacle-corrected visual acuity between groups was noted, with no eye losing 2 lines and 5% in the suspect keratoconus group and 2% of controls losing 1 line. No cases of ectasia were observed in either group.

Conclusions:

Suspect keratoconus, confirmed to be non-keratoconic by epithelial thickness profile criteria demonstrated equal stability to control eyes 1 year after LASIK. Epithelial thickness profiles may enable LASIK to be performed in eyes that would otherwise have been excluded due to topographic suspect keratoconus. Further follow-up is being carried out. [J Refract Surg. 2009;25:569–577.]

  • 1.Barraquer JI. Queratomileusis y queratofakia. Bogota, Colombia: Instituto Barraquer de America; 1980.

    > Google Scholar
  • 2.Seiler T, Quurke AW. Iatrogenic keratectasia after LASIK in a case of forme fruste keratoconus. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1998; 24:1007–1009.

    > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 3.Randleman JB, Trattler WB, Stulting RD. Validation of the Ectasia Risk Score System for preoperative laser in situ keratomileusis screening. Am J Ophthalmol. 2008; 145:813–818.

    > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 4.Randleman JB, Woodward M, Lynn MJ, Stulting RD. Risk assessment for ectasia after corneal refractive surgery. Ophthalmology. 2008; 115:37–50.

    > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 5.McLeod SD, Kisla TA, Caro NC, McMahon TT. Iatrogenic keratoconus: corneal ectasia following laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia. Arch Ophthalmol. 2000; 118:282–284.

    > MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 6.Schmitt-Bernard CF, Lesage C, Arnaud B. Keratectasia induced by laser in situ keratomileusis in keratoconus. J Refract Surg. 2000; 16:368–370.

    > LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 7.Lafond G, Bazin R, Lajoie C. Bilateral severe keratoconus after laser in situ keratomileusis in a patient with forme fruste keratoconus. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2001; 27:1115–1118.

    > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 8.Argento C, Cosentino MJ, Tytiun A, Rapetti G, Zarate J. Corneal ectasia after laser in situ keratomileusis. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2001; 27:1440–1448.

    > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 9.Jabbur NS, Stark WJ, Green WR. Corneal ectasia after laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis. Arch Ophthalmol. 2001; 119:1714–1716.

    > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 10.Randleman JB, Russell B, Ward MA, Thompson KP, Stulting RD. Risk factors and prognosis for corneal ectasia after LASIK. Ophthalmology. 2003; 110:267–275.

    > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 11.Chiang RK, Park AJ, Rapuano CJ, Cohen EJ. Bilateral keratoconus after LASIK in a keratoconus patient. Eye Contact Lens. 2003; 29:90–92.

    > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 12.Fogla R, Rao SK, Padmanabhan P. Keratectasia in 2 cases with pellucid marginal corneal degeneration after laser in situ keratomileusis. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2003; 29:788–791.

    > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 13.Buzard KA, Tuengler A, Febbraro JL. Treatment of mild to moderate keratoconus with laser in situ keratomileusis. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1999; 25:1600–1609.

    > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 14.Rabinowitz YS. Videokeratographic indices to aid in screening for keratoconus. J Refract Surg. 1995; 11:371–379.

    > LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 15.Rabinowitz YS, Rasheed K. KISA% index: a quantitative videokeratography algorithm embodying minimal topographic criteria for diagnosing keratoconus. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1999; 25:1327–1335.

    > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 16.Maeda N, Klyce SD, Smolek MK, Thompson HW. Automated keratoconus screening with corneal topography analysis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1994; 35:2749–2757.

    > MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 17.Reinstein DZ, Archer TJ, Gobbe M. Corneal epithelial thickness profile in the diagnosis of keratoconus. J Refract Surg. 2009; 25:604–610.

    > LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 18.Reinstein DZ, Silverman RH, Rondeau MJ, Lloyd HO, Lizzi FL, Daley SW, Coleman DJ. Very high frequency digital ultrasound scanning in LASIK and phakic intraocular lenses. In: Coleman DJ, Silverman RH, Lizzi FL, eds. Ultrasonography of the Eye and Orbit. 2nd ed. Philadelphia, Pa: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2005.

    > Google Scholar
  • 19.Reinstein DZ, Archer TJ. Combined Artemis very high-frequency digital ultrasound-assisted transepithelial phototherapeutic keratectomy and wavefront-guided treatment following multiple corneal refractive procedures. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2006; 32:1870–1876.

    > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 20.Doyle SJ, Hynes E, Naroo S, Shah S. PRK in patients with a keratoconic topography picture. The concept of a physiological ‘displaced apex syndrome.’ Br J Ophthalmol. 1996; 80:25–28.

    > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 21.Georgiou T, Funnell CL, Cassels-Brown A, O'Conor R. Influence of ethnic origin on the incidence of keratoconus and associated atopic disease in Asians and white patients. Eye. 2004; 18:379–383.

    > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 22.Luce DA. Determining in vivo biomechanical properties of the cornea with an ocular response analyzer. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005; 31:156–162.

    > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 23.Shah S, Laiquzzaman M, Bhojwani R, Mantry S, Cunliffe I. Assessment of the biomechanical properties of the cornea with the ocular response analyzer in normal and keratoconic eyes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007; 48:3026–3031.

    > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 24.Ambrósio R, Alonso RS, Luz A, Coca Velarde LG. Corneal-thickness spatial profile and corneal-volume distribution: tomographic indices to detect keratoconus. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2006; 32:1851–1859.

    > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 25.Reinstein DZ, Silverman RH, Trokel SL, Coleman DJ. Corneal pachymetric topography. Ophthalmology. 1994; 101:432–438.

    > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 26.Reinstein DZ, Silverman RH, Raevsky T, Simoni GJ, Lloyd HO, Najafi DJ, Rondeau MJ, Coleman DJ. Arc-scanning very high-frequency digital ultrasound for 3D pachymetric mapping of the corneal epithelium and stroma in laser in situ keratomileusis. J Refract Surg. 2000; 16:414–430.

    > LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 27.Reinstein DZ, Sutton HF, Srivannaboon S, Silverman RH, Archer TJ, Coleman DJ. Evaluating microkeratome efficacy by 3D corneal lamellar flap thickness accuracy and reproducibility using Artemis VHF digital ultrasound arc-scanning. J Refract Surg. 2006; 22:431–440.

    > LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 28.Reinstein DZ, Archer TJ, Gobbe M, Silverman RH, Coleman DJ. Epithelial thickness in the normal cornea: three-dimensional display with Artemis very high-frequency digital ultrasound. J Refract Surg. 2008; 24:571–581.

    > LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 29.Reinstein D, Archer T, Gobbe M, Silverman R, Coleman DJ. Stromal thickness in the normal cornea: three-dimensional display with Artemis very high-frequency digital ultrasound. J Refract Surg. Available at http://www.journalofrefractivesurgery.com/preprint.asp. Posted online September 30, 2008.

    > Google Scholar
  • 30.Eydelman MB, Drum B, Holladay J, Hilmantel G, Kezirian G, Durrie D, Stulting RD, Sanders D, Wong B. Standardized analyses of correction of astigmatism by laser systems that reshape the cornea. J Refract Surg. 2006; 22:81–95.

    > LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 31.Randleman JB. Post-laser in-situ keratomileusis ectasia: current understanding and future directions. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2006; 17:406–412.

    > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 32.Lifshitz T, Levy J, Klemperer I, Levinger S. Late bilateral keratectasia after LASIK in a low myopic patient. J Refract Surg. 2005; 21:494–496.

    > LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 33.Piccoli PM, Gomes AA, Piccoli FV. Corneal ectasia detected 32 months after LASIK for correction of myopia and asymmetric astigmatism. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2003; 29:1222–1225.

    > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 34.Jampaulo M, Maloney RK. Lack of progression of ectasia seven years after LASIK in a highly myopic keratoconic eye. J Refract Surg. 2008; 24:707–709.

    > LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 35.Cennamo G, Intravaja A, Boccuzzi D, Marotta G, Cennamo G. Treatment of keratoconus by topography-guided customized photorefractive keratectomy: two-year follow-up study. J Refract Surg. 2008; 24:145–149.

    > LinkGoogle Scholar

We use cookies on this site to enhance your user experience. For a complete overview of all the cookies used, please see our privacy policy.

×