Skip to main content
Journal of Refractive Surgery, 2009;25(S4):S927–S930
Cite this articlePublished Online:https://doi.org/10.3928/1081597X-20090915-05Cited by:5

Abstract

Purpose:

The predictability and safety of LASIK with the optimized aspheric transition zone (OATz) and cross-cylinder technique were evaluated for the surgical correction of myopia with 1.00 to 4.25 diopters (D) of astigmatism.

Methods:

In this prospective study, 74 eyes of 48 consecutive LASIK patients with astigmatism ranging from 1.00 to 4.25 D were evaluated. All eyes underwent laser ablation with profile 7 of the OATz algorithm with the NIDEK CXIII excimer laser platform. Refractive outcomes, visual acuity, and patient satisfaction were assessed based on 6-month postoperative data.

Results:

Preoperative manifest refraction spherical equivalent (MRSE) was −2.10±1.19 D (range: −0.50 to −5.75 D) and mean cylinder was −1.94±0.89 D (range: −1.00 to −4.25 D). At 6 months postoperatively, the mean MRSE for all eyes was 0.01−0.37 D (range: −0.75 to −1.00 D). Postoperatively, 78.3% (58/74) of eyes achieved uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) of 20/20 or better, and 97.3% (72/74) of eyes achieved UCVA of 20/40 or better. Regarding predictability, 94.6% (70/74) of eyes were within −0.50 D of intended MRSE and 98.6% (73/74) of eyes were within −1.00 D of intended MRSE. Four (5.3%) eyes lost two lines of best spectacle-corrected visual acuity at 6 months. Stability was reached between 1 and 3 months and verified at 6 months postoperatively.

Conclusions:

LASIK with OATz and the cross-cylinder technique is safe and predictable for the treatment of patients with astigmatism up to 4.25 D. [J Refract Surg. 2009;25:S927–S930.]

  • 1.Chen S, Wang Y, Wang Q. Outcomes of NIDEK optical path difference custom ablation treatments (OPDCAT) for myopia with or without astigmatism. J Refract Surg. 2009; 25:S142–S147.

    > AbstractGoogle Scholar
  • 2.Van Gelder RN, Steger-May K, Yang SH, Rattanatam T, Pepose JS. Comparison of photorefractive keratectomy, astigmatic PRK, laser in situ keratomileusis, and astigmatic LASIK in the treatment of myopia. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2002; 28:462–476.

    > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 3.Condon PI, Mulhern M, Fulcher T, Foley-Nolan A, O'Keefe M. Laser intrastromal keratomileusis for high myopia and myopic astigmatism. Br J Ophthalmol. 1997; 81:199–206.

    > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 4.Vinciguerra P, Camesasca FI. Mixed astigmatism: theory and technique. Int Ophthalmol Clin. 2002; 42:31–40.

    > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 5.Vinciguerra P, Sborgia M, Epstein D, Azzolini M, MacRae S. Photorefractive keratectomy to correct myopic or hyperopic astigmatism with a cross-cylinder ablation. J Refract Surg. 1999; 15:S183–S185.

    > LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 6.Hori-Komai Y, Toda I, Asano-Kato N, Ito M, Yamamoto T, Tsubota K. Comparison of LASIK using the NIDEK EC-5000 optimized aspheric transition zone (OATz) and conventional ablation profile. J Refract Surg. 2006; 22:546–555.

    > LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 7.El Danasoury AM. NIDEK optimized prolate ablation for the treatment of myopia with and without astigmatism. J Refract Surg. 2009; 25:S136–S141.

    > LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 8.Khan HN, Kaye GB, Febbraro JL. Correction of high astigmatism: case studies using the mixed-cylinder approach. J Refract Surg. 2006; 22:S1073–S1078.

    > LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 9.Shin SJ, Lee HY. The efficacy of multi-zone cross-cylinder method for astigmatism correction. Korean J Ophthalmol. 2004; 18:29–34.

    > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

We use cookies on this site to enhance your user experience. For a complete overview of all the cookies used, please see our privacy policy.

×