Skip to main content
Journal of Refractive Surgery, 2009;25(12):1075–1082
Cite this articlePublished Online:https://doi.org/10.3928/1081597X-20091117-06Cited by:7

Abstract

Purpose:

To evaluate visual outcomes of LASIK in eyes with high astigmatic refractive errors with low spherical component.

Methods:

We prospectively evaluated cross cylinder LASIK in patients with high astigmatic eyes with low spherical component over a 2-year period. All laser surgeries were performed with the NIDEK EC-5000 excimer laser. We used power vectors (M [spherical equivalent] and J0, and J45 [cylinder]) to analyze the astigmatic results. Main outcome measures were uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), manifest refraction, and complications.

Results:

Thirty-four eyes of 22 patients were included. Patients were followed for 21.8±3.7 months. At the last examination, UCVA of 20/40 or better was observed in 33 (97.1%) eyes. Best spectacle-corrected visual acuity after LASIK improved significantly in comparison to BSCVA before surgery (P<.005). Mean preoperative cylinder was −4.73±0.89 diopters (D) (range: −4.00 to −7.00 D), which decreased to −0.29±0.47 D (range: 0.00 to −1.50 D) at last follow-up (P<.001). Reduction in the magnitude of power vectors was 92.4% for M, 103.2% for J0, and 76.4% for J45. No cases of postoperative astigmatic regression or corneal haze were observed.

Conclusions:

Cross cylinder LASIK with the NIDEK EC-5000 excimer laser is a successful procedure for correcting high astigmatism and improving vision.

[J Refract Surg. 2009;25:1075–1082.]

  • 1.Doane J. Treatment of astigmatism. In: Burrato L, Brint SF, eds. Custom LASIK: Surgical Techniques and Complications. Thorofare, NJ: SLACK Incorporated; 2003:247–258.

    > Google Scholar
  • 2.Dausch D, Klein R, Schröder E. Excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy for hyperopia. Refract Corneal Surg. 1993; 9:20–28.

    > LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 3.McDonnell PJ, Moreira H, Clapham TN, D'Arcy J, Munnerlyn CR. Photorefractive keratectomy for astigmatism. Initial clinical results. Arch Ophthalmol. 1991; 109:1370–1373.

    > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 4.Vinciguerra P, Camesasca FI. Decentration after refractive surgery. J Refract Surg. 2001; 17:S190–S191.

    > LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 5.Alió JL, Artola A, Ayala MJ, Claramonte P. Correcting simple myopic astigmatism with the excimer laser. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1995; 21:512–515.

    > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 6.Azar DT, Primack JD. Theoretical analysis of ablation depths and profiles in laser in situ keratomileusis for compound hyperopic and mixed astigmatism. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2000; 26:1123–1136.

    > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 7.Chayet AS, Montes M, Gómez L, Rodríguez X, Robledo N, MacRae S. Bitoric laser in situ keratomileusis for the correction of simple myopic and mixed astigmatism. Ophthalmology. 2001; 108:303–308.

    > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 8.Vinciguerra P, Camesasca F. Cross-cylinder ablation. In: Mac-Rae S, Krueger RR, Applegate RA, eds. Customized Corneal Ablation. The Quest for SuperVision. Thorofare, NJ: SLACK Incorporated; 2001:319–327.

    > Google Scholar
  • 9.El Danasoury MA, Waring GO, El Maghraby A, Mehrez K. Excimer laser in situ keratomileusis to correct compound myopic astigmatism. J Refract Surg. 1997; 13:511–520.

    > LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 10.Albarrán-Diego C, Muñoz G, Montés-Micó R, Alió JL. Bitoric laser in situ keratomileusis for astigmatism. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2004; 30:1471–1478.

    > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 11.Hassaballa MA, Ayala MJ, Alió JL. Laser in situ keratomileusis correction of mixed astigmatism by bitoric ablation. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2003; 29:1889–1895.

    > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 12.Shin SJ, Lee HY. The efficacy of multi-zone cross-cylinder method for astigmatism correction. Korean J Ophthalmol. 2004; 18:29–34.

    > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 13.Eydelman MB, Drum B, Holladay J, Hilmantel G, Kezirian G, Durrie D, Stulting RD, Sanders D, Wong B. Standardized analyses of correction of astigmatism by laser systems that reshape the cornea. J Refract Surg. 2006; 22:81–95.

    > LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 14.Alpins N. Analysis of aggregate surgically induced refractive change, prediction error, and intraocular astigmatism. J Refract Surg. 2001; 17:705–707.

    > LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 15.Harris WF. Power vectors versus power matrices, and the mathematical nature of dioptric power. Optom Vis Sci. 2007; 84:1060–1063.

    > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 16.Holladay JT, Moran JR, Kezirian GM. Analysis of aggregate surgically induced refractive change, prediction error, and intraocular astigmatism. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2001; 27:61–79.

    > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 17.Naeser K. Assessment and statistics of surgically induced astigmatism. Acta Ophthalmol. 2008; 86:5–28.

    > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 18.Naeser K, Hjortdal J. Polar value analysis of refractive data. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2001; 27:86–94.

    > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 19.Naeser K, Knudsen EB, Hansen MK. Bivariate polar value analysis of surgically induced astigmatism. J Refract Surg. 2002; 18:72–78.

    > LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 20.Thibos LN, Horner D. Power vector analysis of the optical outcome of refractive surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2001; 27:80–85.

    > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 21.Thibos LN, Wheeler W, Horner D. Power vectors: an application of Fourier analysis to the description and statistical analysis of refractive error. Optom Vis Sci. 1997; 74:367–375.

    > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 22.Thibos LN, Applegate RA, Schwiegerling JT, Webb R. Standards for reporting the optical aberrations of eyes. J Refract Surg. 2002; 18:S652–S660.

    > LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 23.Muñoz-Escrivá L, Furlan WD. Subjective refraction techniques in the frame of the three-dimensional dioptric space. Optom Vis Sci. 2001; 78:106–112.

    > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 24.Holladay JT, Prager TC. Mean visual acuity. Am J Ophthalmol. 1991; 111:372–374.

    > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 25.Alió JL, Hassaballa MA, Espinosa MJ, Ebid AH. Bitoric approach in the correction of mixed astigmatism. Int Ophthalmol Clin. 2003; 43:163–170.

    > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 26.Rueda L, Pineda-Fernandez A, Huang D, Nur J. Laser in situ keratomileusis for mixed and simple myopic astigmatism with the NIDEK EC-5000 laser. J Refract Surg. 2002; 18:234–238.

    > LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 27.Vinciguerra P. Cross cylinder ablation for the correction of myopic or hyperopic astigmatism. In: Gimbel HV, Anderson Penno EE, eds. Refractive Surgery: A Manual of Principles and Practice. Thorofare, NJ: SLACK Incorporated; 2000:105–113.

    > Google Scholar
  • 28.Vinciguerra P, Sborgia M, Epstein D, Azzolini M, MacRae S. Photorefractive keratectomy to correct myopic or hyperopic astigmatism with a cross-cylinder ablation. J Refract Surg. 1999; 15:S183–S185.

    > LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 29.Pujol J, Arjona M, Arasa J, Badia V. Influence of amount and changes in axis of astigmatism on retinal image quality. J Opt Soc Am A. 1998; 15:2514–2521.

    > CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 30.Alpins N. Astigmatism analysis by the Alpins method. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2001; 27:31–49.

    > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 31.Alpins N. Terms used for the analysis of astigmatism. J Refract Surg. 2006; 22:528.

    > LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 32.Morlet N, Minassian D, Dart J. Astigmatism and the analysis of its surgical correction. Br J Ophthalmol. 2001; 85:1127–1138.

    > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 33.Naeser K, Behrens JK. Correlation between polar values and vector analysis. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1997; 23:76–81.

    > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 34.Naeser K. Standards for reporting results of refractive surgery. J Refract Surg. 2001; 17:470–473.

    > LinkGoogle Scholar

We use cookies on this site to enhance your user experience. For a complete overview of all the cookies used, please see our privacy policy.

×