Skip to main content
Published Online:https://doi.org/10.3928/1081597X-20110106-03Cited by:8

Abstract

PURPOSE:

To assess short-term clinical outcomes after implantation of phakic intraocular lenses (Visian ICL, STAAR Surgical Co) in US military warfighters who are not good candidates for laser vision correction.

METHODS:

A retrospective interventional consecutive case series analysis of all eyes that underwent ICL surgery during a 14-month time period was performed. Main outcome measures included indications for surgery, efficacy, predictability, and early adverse events.

RESULTS:

Three-month postoperative visual data were available for 135 eyes of 69 patients who underwent ICL implantation during the study period. Indications included abnormal corneal topography (37%), thin predicted residual bed following LASIK (32%), history of dry eye (13%), thin corneal thickness (11%), or other (7%). Mean patient age was 30.9±6.6 years. Mean preoperative spherical equivalent refraction was −6.00±1.92 diopters (D) (range: −2.63 to −11.50 D). Three months postoperative, uncorrected distance visual acuity of 20/20 or better was found in 129/135 (96%) eyes and 91/135 (67%) were 20/15 or better. Manifest refraction and corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) data were available for 128 eyes. Forty-two (33%) eyes had improvement of one or more lines of CDVA. One hundred fifteen eyes (90%) were within ±0.50 D of emmetropia, and predictability within ±0.75 D was found in 127/128 (99%) eyes. No significant intra- or postoperative complications were observed.

CONCLUSIONS:

This retrospective analysis of 3-month outcomes suggests that Visian ICL implantation in myopic warfighters provides excellent refractive and visual results. Further study is needed to evaluate long-term results.

  • 1.Tanzer D. The state of refractive surgery in the U.S. Navy. Presented at: Fourth Annual International Military Refractive Surgery Conference; January 11–13, 2010; San Antonio, Texas.

    Google Scholar
  • 2.Reilly C. The state of refractive surgery in the U.S. Air Force. Presented at: Fourth Annual International Military Refractive Surgery Conference; January 11–13, 2010; San Antonio, Texas.

    Google Scholar
  • 3.Bower S. The state of refractive surgery in the U.S. Army. Presented at: Fourth Annual International Military Refractive Surgery Conference; January 11–13, 2010; San Antonio, Texas.

    Google Scholar
  • 4.Hammond MD, Madigan WP, Bower KS. Refractive surgery in the United States Army, 2000–2003. Ophthalmology. 2005; 112(2):184–190.10.1016/j.ophtha.2004.08.014

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 5.Sanders DR, Brown DC, Martin RG, Shepherd J, Deitz MR, De-Luca M. Implantable contact lens for moderate to high myopia: phase 1 FDA clinical study with 6 month follow-up. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1998; 24(5):607–611.

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 6.Sanders DR, Vukich JA, Doney K, Gaston MImplantable Contact Lens in Treatment of Myopia Study Group. U.S. Food and Drug Administration clinical trial of the Implantable Contact Lens for moderate to high myopia. Ophthalmology. 2003; 110(2):255–266.10.1016/S0161-6420(02)01771-2

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 7.Sanders DR, Doney K, Poco MICL in Treatment of Myopia Study Group. United States Food and Drug Administration clinical trial of the Implantable Collamer Lens (ICL) for moderate to high myopia: three-year follow-up. Ophthalmology. 2004; 111(9):1683–1692.10.1016/j.ophtha.2004.03.026

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 8.Sanders DR. Anterior subcapsular opacities and cataracts 5 years after surgery in the visian implantable collamer lens FDA trial. J Refract Surg. 2008; 24(6):566–570.

    LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 9.Holladay J. Visual acuity measurements. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2004; 30(2):287–290.10.1016/j.jcrs.2004.01.014

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 10.Women in the U.S. Army. Available at: http://www.army.mil/women/. Accessed November 2010.

    Google Scholar
  • 11.Weichel ED, Colyer MH, Ludlow SE, Bower KS, Eiseman AS. Combat ocular trauma visual outcomes during operations iraqi and enduring freedom. Ophthalmology. 2008; 115(12):2235–2245.10.1016/j.ophtha.2008.08.033

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 12.Psolka M, Bower KS, Brooks DB, Donnelly SJ, Iglesias M, Rimm WR, Ward TP. Ocular diseases and nonbattle injuries seen at a tertiary care medical center during the Global War on Terrorism. Mil Med. 2007; 172(5):491–497.

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 13.Musa F, Tailor R, Gao A, Hutley E, Rauz S, Scott RA. Contact lens-related microbial keratitis in deployed British military personnel. Br J Ophthalmol. 2010; 94(8):988–993.10.1136/bjo.2009.161430

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 14.Bower KS, Donnelly SJ, Stutzman RD, Ward TP, Weber E. Acanthamoeba keratitis in a U.S. Army soldier after unauthorized use of contact lenses in the combat theater. Mil Med. 2006; 171(9):833–837.

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 15.Panday VA, Reilly CD. Refractive surgery in the United States Air Force. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2009; 20(4):242–246.10.1097/ICU.0b013e32832a6f5a

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 16.Stanley PF, Tanzer DJ, Schallhorn SC. Laser refractive surgery in the United States Navy. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2008; 19(4):321–324.10.1097/ICU.0b013e3283009ee3

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 17.Franklin QJ, Tanzer DJ. Late traumatic flap displacement after laser in situ keratomileusis. Mil Med. 2004; 169(4):334–336.

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 18.Dawson DG, Randleman JB, Grossniklaus HE, O’Brien TP, Dubovy SR, Schmack I, Stulting RD, Edelhauser HF. Corneal ectasia after excimer laser keratorefractive surgery: histopathology, ultrastructure, and pathophysiology. Ophthalmology. 2008; 115(12):2181–2191.10.1016/j.ophtha.2008.06.008

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 19.Randleman JB, Russell B, Ward MA, Thompson KP, Stulting RD. Risk factors and prognosis for corneal ectasia after LASIK. Ophthalmology. 2003; 110(2):267–275.10.1016/S0161-6420(02)01727-X

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 20.Randleman JB, Trattler WB, Stulting RD. Validation of the Ectasia Risk Score System for preoperative laser in situ keratomileusis screening. Am J Ophthalmol. 2008; 145(5):813–818.10.1016/j.ajo.2007.12.033

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 21.Binder PS, Trattler WB. Evaluation of a risk factor scoring system for corneal ectasia after LASIK in eyes with normal topography. J Refract Surg. 2010; 26(4):241–250.10.3928/1081597X-20100212-02

    LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 22.Sanders D, Vukich JA. Comparison of implantable collamer lens (ICL) and laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) for low myopia. Cornea. 2006; 25(10):1139–1146.10.1097/ICO.0b013e31802cbf3c

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 23.Sanders DR, Vukich JA. Comparison of implantable contact lens and laser assisted in situ keratomileusis for moderate to high myopia. Cornea. 2003; 22(4):324–331.10.1097/00003226-200305000-00009

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 24.McCauley MB, Anderson DM, Johnson AJ. Posterior chamber visian implantable collamer lens: stability and evaluation following traumatic grenade explosion. J Refract Surg. 2008; 24(6):648–651.

    LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 25.Sánchez-Galeana CA, Smith RJ, Sanders DR, Rodríguez FX, Litwak S, Montes M, Chayet AS. Lens opacities after posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens implantation. Ophthalmology. 2003; 110(4):781–785.10.1016/S0161-6420(02)01973-5

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 26.Sarikkola AU, Sen HN, Uusitalo RJ, Laatikainen L. Traumatic cataract and other adverse events with the implantable contact lens. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005; 31(3):511–524.10.1016/j.jcrs.2004.06.084

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 27.Sanders DR, Vukich JAICL in Treatment of Myopia (ITM) Study Group. Incidence of lens opacities and clinically significant cataracts with the implantable contact lens: comparison of two lens designs. J Refract Surg. 2002; 18(6):673–682. Erratum in J Refract Surg. 200;19(4):2nd page following table of contents.

    LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 28.Chang JS, Meau AY. Visian Collamer phakic intraocular lens in high myopic Asian eyes. J Refract Surg. 2007; 23(1):17–25.

    LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 29.Kamiya K, Shimizu K, Igarashi A, Hikita F, Komatsu M. Four-year follow-up of posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens implantation for moderate to high myopia. Arch Ophthalmol. 2009; 127(7):845–850.10.1001/archophthalmol.2009.67

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 30.Jiménez-Alfaro I, Benítez del Castillo JM, García-Feijoó J, Gilde Bernabé JG, Serrano de La Iglesia JM. Safety of posterior chamber phakic intraocular lenses for the correction of high myopia: anterior segment changes after posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens implantation. Ophthalmology. 2001; 108(1):90–99.10.1016/S0161-6420(00)00403-6

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 31.Pineda-Fernández A, Jaramillo J, Vargas J, Jaramillo M, Jaramillo J, Galíndez A. Phakic posterior chamber intraocular lens for high myopia. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2004; 30(11):2277–2283.10.1016/j.jcrs.2004.03.035

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 32.Narayanaswamy A, Vijava L, Shantha B, Baskaran M, Sathidevi AV, Baluswamy S. Anterior chamber angle assessment using gonioscopy and ultrasound biomicroscopy. Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2004; 48(1):44–49.10.1007/s10384-003-0004-4

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

We use cookies on this site to enhance your user experience. For a complete overview of all the cookies used, please see our privacy policy.

×