Skip to main content
Published Online:https://doi.org/10.3928/1081597X-20111005-02Cited by:13

Abstract

Purpose:

To evaluate the visual quality of two theoretical multifocal corneal models designed to correct presbyopia by corneal photoablation.

Methods:

Two theoretical multifocal corneal surfaces were analyzed by ray tracing: a central model (with a central zone for near vision and a peripheral zone for distance vision), and a peripheral model (with a central zone for distance vision and a peripheral zone for near vision). For both models, the effect of the size of the central zone and transition zone as well as the size of the pupil was evaluated.

Results:

Our results show that a smaller transition zone favors total visual quality in both models. The optimal size of the central zone depends both on the size of the transition zone used as well as the model. However, both models responded similarly with respect to the variations in pupil size, providing the same visual quality although in an opposite way.

Conclusions:

This work shows that the optimal diameter of the central zone is smaller for the central model than for the peripheral model. Also, pupil size plays a fundamental role in achieving multifocality, showing that patient’s pupil size should be thoroughly evaluated prior to multifocal refractive surgery.

  • 1.Jackson B. Clinical outcomes of presbyopic corrections. Presented at: Fifth International Conference of Wavefront Sensing & Optimized Refractive Corrections; February 21–24, 2004; British Columbia, Canada.

    Google Scholar
  • 2.Alió JL, Chaubard JJ, Caliz A, Sala E, Patel S. Correction of presbyopia by technovision central multifocal LASIK (presby-LASIK). J Refract Surg. 2006; 22(5):453–460.

    LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 3.Jung WS, Kim MJ, Park SH, Joo C. Multifocal corneal ablation for hyperopic presbyopes. J Refract Surg. 2008; 24(9):903–910.

    LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 4.Cantú R, Rosales MA, Tepichín E, Curioca A, Montes V, Bonilla J. Advanced surface ablation for presbyopia using the Nidek EC-5000 laser. J Refract Surg. 2004; 20(5 Suppl):S711–S713.

    AbstractGoogle Scholar
  • 5.Telandro A. Pseudo-accommodative cornea: a new concept for correction of presbyopia. J Refract Surg. 2004; 20(5 Suppl): S714–S717.

    AbstractGoogle Scholar
  • 6.Pinelli R, Ortiz D, Simonetto A, Bacchi C, Sala E, Alió JL. Correction of presbyopia in hyperopia with a center-distance, paracentral-near technique using the Technolas 217z platform. J Refract Surg. 2008; 24(5):494–500.

    LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 7.El Danasoury AM, Gamaly TO, Hantera M. Multizone LASIK with peripheral near zone for correction of presbyopia in myopic and hyperopic eyes: 1-year results. J Refract Surg. 2009; 25(3):296–305.

    LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 8.Gordon M. Presbyopia corrections with the WaveLight ALLEGRETTO: 3-month results. J Refract Surg. 2010; 26(10): S824–S826.10.3928/1081597X-20100921-10

    LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 9.Liou HL, Brennan N. Anatomically accurate, finite model eye for optical modeling. J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis. 1997; 14(8):1684–1695.10.1364/JOSAA.14.001684

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 10.Marsack JD, Thibos LN, Applegate RA. Metrics of optical quality derived from wave aberrations predict visual performance. J Vis. 2004; 4(4):322–328.10.1167/4.4.8

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 11.Chen L, Singer B, Guirao A, Porter J, Williams DR. Image metrics for predicting subjective image quality. Optom Vis Sci. 2005; 82(5):358–369.10.1097/01.OPX.0000162647.80768.7F

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 12.Thibos LN, Hong X, Bradley A, Applegate RA. Accuracy and precision of objective refraction from wavefront aberrations. J Vis. 2004; 4(4):329–351.10.1167/4.4.9

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 13.Williams DR. Subjective image quality metrics from the wave aberration. Presented at: 4th International Congress on Wavefront Sensing & Aberration Free Refractive Correction; February 14–16, 2003; San Francisco, CA.

    Google Scholar
  • 14.Ortiz D, Alió JL, Illueca C, et al.Optical analysis of presby-LASIK treatment by a light propagation algorithm. J Refract Surg. 2007; 23(1):39–44.

    LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 15.Illueca C, Alió JL, Mas D, et al.Pseudoaccommodation and visual acuity with Technovision presbyLASIK and a theoretical simulated Array multifocal intraocular lens. J Refract Surg. 2008; 24(4):344–349.

    LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 16.Atchison DA, Smith G. Optics of the Human Eye. 1st ed. Oxford, United Kingdom: Butterworth-Heinemann; 2000.

    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 17.Koller T, Seiler T. Four corneal presbyopia corrections: simulations of optical consequences on retinal image quality. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2006; 32(12):2118–2123.10.1016/j.jcrs.2006.08.038

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

We use cookies on this site to enhance your user experience. For a complete overview of all the cookies used, please see our privacy policy.

×