Skip to main content
Published Online:https://doi.org/10.3928/1081597X-20120508-02Cited by:121

Abstract

PURPOSE:

To compare the effect of conventional phacoemulsification and femtosecond laser–assisted cataract surgery on the cornea using Scheimpflug imaging and noncontact specular microscopy.

METHODS:

In each group, 38 eyes (38 patients) underwent cataract surgery using either femtosecond laser–assisted (Alcon LenSx laser) (femtolaser group) or conventional phacoemulsification (phaco group). Central corneal thickness, 3-mm corneal volume, and Pentacam Nucleus Staging (PNS) were determined by a rotating Scheimpflug camera (Pentacam HR, Oculus Optikgeräte GmbH), and the volume stress index was calculated at 1 day and 1 month postoperatively. Endothelial cell count was measured by noncontact specular microscopy preoperatively, 1 day, 1 week, and 1 month postoperatively.

RESULTS:

Central corneal thickness was significantly higher in the phaco group (607±91 μm) than in the femtolaser group (580±42 μm) on day 1, but did not differ significantly preoperatively and at 1 week and 1 month. Volume stress index at day 1 was significantly lower in the femtolaser group than in the phaco group (P<.05) but did not differ significantly at 1 month. Multivariate regression analysis showed that the type of surgery had a significant effect on central corneal thickness.

CONCLUSIONS:

Femtosecond laser–assisted cataract surgery causes less corneal swelling in the early postoperative period and may cause less trauma to corneal endothelial cells than manual phacoemulsification.

  • 1.Nagy Z, Takacs A, Filkorn T, Sarayba M. Initial clinical evaluation of an intraocular femtosecond laser in cataract surgery. J Refract Surg. 2009; 25(12):1053–1060.10.3928/1081597X-20091117-04

    LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 2.Nagy ZZ, Kránitz K, Takacs AI, Miháltz K, Kovács I, Knorz MC. Comparison of intraocular lens decentration parameters after femtosecond and manual capsulotomies. J Refract Surg. 2011; 27(8):564–569.10.3928/1081597X-20110607-01

    LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 3.Kránitz K, Takacs A, Miháltz K, Kovács I, Knorz MC, Nagy ZZ. Femtosecond laser capsulotomy and manual continuous curvilinear capsulorrhexis parameters and their effects on intraocular lens centration. J Refract Surg. 2011; 27(8):558–563.10.3928/1081597X-20110623-03

    LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 4.Miháltz K, Knorz MC, Alió JL, et al.Internal aberrations and optical quality after femtosecond laser anterior capsulotomy in cataract surgery. J Refract Surg. 2011; 27(10):711–716.10.3928/1081597X-20110913-01

    LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 5.Nagy ZZ, Kránitz K, Takacs A, Filkorn T, Gergely R, Knorz MC. Intraocular femtosecond laser use in traumatic cataracts following penetrating and blunt trauma. J Refract Surg. 2012; 28(2):151–153.10.3928/1081597X-20120120-01

    LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 6.Ecsedy M, Miháltz K, Kovács I, Takacs A, Filkorn T, Nagy ZZ. Effect of femtosecond laser cataract surgery on the macula. J Refract Surg. 2011; 27(10):717–722.10.3928/1081597X-20110825-01

    LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 7.Baradaran-Rafii A, Rahmati-Kamel M, Eslani M, Kiavash V, Karimian F. Effect of hydrodynamic parameters on corneal endothelial cell loss after phacoemulsification. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2009; 35(4):732–737.10.1016/j.jcrs.2008.12.017

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 8.Takahashi H. Free radical development in phacoemulsification cataract surgery. J Nihon Med Sch. 2005; 72(1):4–12.10.1272/jnms.72.4

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 9.Yeniad B, Corum I, Ozgun C. The effects of blunt trauma and cataract surgery on corneal endothelial cell density. Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol. 2010; 17(4):354–358.10.4103/0974-9233.71604

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 10.Crema AS, Walsh A, Yamane Y, Nosé W. Comparative study of coaxial phacoemulsification and microincision cataract surgery. One-year follow-up. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2007; 33(6):1014–1018.10.1016/j.jcrs.2007.02.035

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 11.Richard J, Hoffart L, Chavane F, Ridings B, Conrath J. Corneal endothelial cell loss after cataract extraction by using ultrasound phacoemulsification versus a fluid-based system. Cornea. 2008; 27(1):17–21.10.1097/ICO.0b013e3181583115

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 12.Storr-Paulsen A, Nørregaard JC, Farik G, Tårnhøj J. The influence of viscoelastic substances on the corneal endothelial cell population during cataract surgery: a prospective study of cohesive and dispersive viscoelastics. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2007; 85(2):183–187.10.1111/j.1600-0420.2006.00784.x

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 13.Cho YK, Chang HS, Kim MS. Risk factors for endothelial cell loss after phacoemulsification: comparison in different anterior chamber depth groups. Korean J Ophthalmol. 2010; 24(1):10–15.10.3341/kjo.2010.24.1.10

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 14.Hutchings N, Simpson TL, Hyun C, et al.Swelling of the human cornea revealed by high-speed, ultrahigh-resolution optical coherence tomography. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010; 51(9):4579–4584.10.1167/iovs.09-4676

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 15.Suzuki H, Takahashi H, Hori J, Hiraoka M, Igarashi T, Shiwa T. Phacoemulsification associated corneal damage evaluated by corneal volume. Am J Ophthalmol. 2006; 142(3):525–528.10.1016/j.ajo.2006.04.024

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 16.Amann J, Holley GP, Lee SB, Edelhauser HF. Increased endothelial cell density in the paracentral and peripheral regions of the human cornea. Am J Ophthalmol. 2003; 135(5):584–590.10.1016/S0002-9394(02)02237-7

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 17.Suzuki H, Oki K, Takahashi K, Shiwa T, Takahashi H. Functional evaluation of corneal endothelium by combined measurement of corneal volume alteration and cell density after phacoemulsification. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2007; 33(12):2077–2082.10.1016/j.jcrs.2007.07.033

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 18.Grewal DS, Brar GS, Grewal SP. Correlation of nuclear cataract lens density using Scheimpflug images with Lens Opacities Classification System III and visual function. Ophthalmology. 2009; 116(8):1436–1443.10.1016/j.ophtha.2009.03.002

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 19.Elnaby EA, El Zawahry OM, Abdelrahman AM, Ibrahim HE. Phaco prechop versus divide and conquer phacoemulsification: a prospective comparative interventional study. Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol. 2008; 15(3):123–127.10.4103/0974-9233.51987

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

We use cookies on this site to enhance your user experience. For a complete overview of all the cookies used, please see our privacy policy.

×