Skip to main content
Journal of Refractive Surgery, 2013;29(10):693–700
Cite this articlePublished Online:https://doi.org/10.3928/1081597X-20130816-01Cited by:5

Abstract

PURPOSE:

To evaluate surgically induced changes in corneal, internal, and ocular higher-order aberrations (HOAs) after phakic intraocular lens (PIOL) implantation and compare them between two PIOLs with different pupillary diameters.

METHODS:

Twenty-three eyes with an Artisan PIOL (Ophtec BV, Groningen, The Netherlands) (Artisan group) and 30 eyes with an Artiflex PIOL (Ophtec BV) (Artiflex group) were retrospectively evaluated. The corneal, internal, and ocular HOAs and refractive data were recorded preoperatively and 6 months postoperatively. The root mean squares (RMSs) of the total HOAs from the third- to sixth-order Zernike coefficients were calculated. The RMSs of the third- and fourth-order coefficients represented coma-like aberrations (S3) and spherical-like aberrations (S4), respectively. The main outcome measures were the differences in the parameters among the groups with different pupillary diameters.

RESULTS:

The mean postoperative spherical equivalents decreased from −11.84 ± 4.90 to −0.16 ± 0.40 diopters and −9.78 ± 3.20 to −0.09 ± 0.26 diopters in the Artisan and Artiflex groups, respectively. With the 4- and 5-mm pupillary diameters, the postoperative internal and ocular spherical aberrations (Z40) were significantly lower in the Artiflex group than in the Artisan group (4 mm, P = .002, .024; 5 mm, P = .004, .022, respectively). With the 6-mm pupillary diameter, there were no significant postoperative differences in any parameter measured between groups; both groups had positive spherical aberration values.

CONCLUSIONS:

The postoperative ocular spherical aberrations were positive after Artisan and Artiflex implantation. The postoperative ocular spherical aberration was greater in the Artisan group, possibly due to differences in the SAs of both PIOLs.

[J Refract Surg. 2013;29(10):693–700.]

  • 1.Dick HB, Budo C, Malecaze F, Guell JL, et al.Foldable Artiflex phakic intraocular lens for the correction of myopia: two-year follow-up results of a prospective European multicenter study. Ophthalmology. 2009; 116:671–677.10.1016/j.ophtha.2008.12.059

    > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 2.Huang D, Schallhorn SC, Sugar A, et al.Phakic intraocular lens implantation for the correction of myopia: a report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology. Ophthalmology. 2009; 116:2244–2258.10.1016/j.ophtha.2009.08.018

    > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 3.Coullet J, Guëll JL, Fournié P, et al.Iris-supported phakic lenses (rigid vs foldable version) for treating moderately high myopia: randomized paired eye comparison. Am J Ophthalmol. 2006; 142:909–916.10.1016/j.ajo.2006.07.021

    > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 4.Benedetti S, Casamenti V, Benedetti M. Long-term endothelial changes in phakic eyes after Artisan intraocular lens implantation to correct myopia: five-year study. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2007; 33:784–790.10.1016/j.jcrs.2007.01.037

    > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 5.Stulting RD, John ME, Maloney RK, et al.Three-year results of Artisan/Verisyse phakic intraocular lens implantation: results of the United States Food and Drug Administration clinical trial. Ophthalmology. 2008; 115:464–472.10.1016/j.ophtha.2007.08.039

    > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 6.Tahzib NG, Nuijts RM, Wu WY, Budo CJ. Long-term study of Artisan phakic intraocular lens implantation for the correction of moderate to high myopia: ten-year follow-up results. Ophthalmology. 2007; 114:1133–1142.10.1016/j.ophtha.2006.09.029

    > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 7.Asano-Kato N, Toda I, Hori-Komai Y, et al.Experience with the Artisan phakic intraocular lens in Asian eyes. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005; 31:910–915.10.1016/j.jcrs.2004.08.057

    > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 8.Torii H, Negishi K, Dogru M, et al.Inflammation after phakic implants. Ophthalmology. 2011; 118:2518e2511–e2512.10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.07.028

    > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 9.Ohtani S, Gekka S, Honbou M, et al.One-year prospective intrapatient comparison of aspherical and spherical intraocular lenses in patients with bilateral cataract. Am J Ophthalmol. 2009; 147:984–989.10.1016/j.ajo.2008.12.037

    > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 10.Dick HB. Recent developments in aspheric intraocular lenses. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2009; 20:25–32.10.1097/ICU.0b013e32831b8bb3

    > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 11.Tahzib NG, MacRae SM, Yoon G, et al.Higher-order aberrations after implantation of iris-fixated rigid or foldable phakic intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008; 34:1913–1920.10.1016/j.jcrs.2008.07.014

    > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 12.Oshika T, Okamoto C, Samejima T, Tokunaga T, Miyata K. Contrast sensitivity function and ocular higher-order wavefront aberrations in normal human eyes. Ophthalmology. 2006; 113:1807–1812.10.1016/j.ophtha.2006.03.061

    > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 13.Amano S, Amano Y, Yamagami S, et al.Age-related changes in corneal and ocular higher-order wavefront aberrations. Am J Ophthalmol. 2004; 137:988–992.10.1016/j.ajo.2004.01.005

    > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 14.Wang L, Koch DD. Ocular higher-order aberrations in individuals screened for refractive surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2003; 29:1896–1903.10.1016/S0886-3350(03)00643-6

    > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 15.Wang L, Dai E, Koch DD, Nathoo A. Optical aberrations of the human anterior cornea. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2003; 29:1514–1521.10.1016/S0886-3350(03)00467-X

    > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 16.Porter J, Guirao A, Cox IG, Williams DR. Monochromatic aberrations of the human eye in a large population. J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis. 2001; 18:1793–1803.10.1364/JOSAA.18.001793

    > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 17.van der Heijde GL. Some optical aspects of implantation of an IOL in a myopic eye. Eur J Implant Refract Surg. 1989; 1:245–248.

    > CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 18.Budo C, Hessloehl JC, Izak M, et al.Multicenter study of the Artisan phakic intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2000; 26:1163–1171.10.1016/S0886-3350(00)00545-9

    > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 19.Rozema JJ, Van Dyck DE, Tassignon MJ. Clinical comparison of 6 aberrometers: Part 1. Technical specifications. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005; 31:1114–1127.10.1016/j.jcrs.2004.11.051

    > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 20.van Philips LA. Higher-order aberrations after iris-fixated fold-able phakic intraocular lens implantation and wavefront-guided photorefractive keratectomy for the correction of myopia. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2011; 37:284–294.10.1016/j.jcrs.2010.08.054

    > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 21.Chandhrasri S, Knorz MC. Comparison of higher order aberrations and contrast sensitivity after LASIK, Verisyse phakic IOL, and Array multifocal IOL. J Refract Surg. 2006; 22:231–236.

    > LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 22.Tehrani M, Dick HB. Changes in higher-order aberrations after implantation of a foldable iris-claw lens in myopic phakic eyes. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2006; 32:250–254.10.1016/j.jcrs.2005.12.036

    > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 23.Chung SH, Lee SJ, Lee HK, Seo KY, Kim EK. Changes in higher order aberrations and contrast sensitivity after implantation of a phakic artisan intraocular lens. Ophthalmologica. 2007; 221:167–172.10.1159/000099296

    > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 24.Pepose JS, Applegate RA. Making sense out of wavefront sensing. Am J Ophthalmol. 2005; 139:335–343.10.1016/j.ajo.2004.11.010

    > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 25.Hidaka Y, Negishi K, Torii H, et al.The impacts of changes in posterior corneal aberrations after cataract surgery. Presented at the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology annual meeting; May 7, 2012; Fort Lauderdale, Florida. Abstract 1385.

    > Google Scholar
  • 26.Kim SW, Ahn H, Kim EK, Kim TI. Comparison of higher order aberrations in eyes with aspherical or spherical intraocular lenses. Eye (Lond). 2008; 22:1493–1498.10.1038/eye.2008.302

    > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 27.Cui H, Hu R, Zhang Y, Lou D. Comparison of pseudophakic visual quality in spherical and aspherical intraocular lenses. Can J Ophthalmol. 2009; 44:274–278.10.3129/i08-121

    > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 28.Ohtani S, Miyata K, Samejima T, Honbou M, Oshika T. Intraindividual comparison of aspherical and spherical intraocular lenses of same material and platform. Ophthalmology. 2009; 116:896–901.10.1016/j.ophtha.2008.11.022

    > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

We use cookies on this site to enhance your user experience. For a complete overview of all the cookies used, please see our privacy policy.

×