Skip to main content
Published Online:https://doi.org/10.3928/1081597X-20160217-06Cited by:8

Abstract

PURPOSE:

To compare visual performance and higher order aberrations (HOAs) based on the position of the near segment in eyes with rotationally asymmetric multifocal intraocular lenses (IOLs).

METHODS:

Asymmetric multifocal IOLs (Lentis Mplus LS-313; Oculentis Optikgeräte GmbH, Wetzlar, Germany) were implanted with the near segment positioned either inferiorly, superiorly, or temporally. Uncorrected distance (UDVA), intermediate (UIVA), and near (UNVA) visual acuity, corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), and distance-corrected intermediate (DCIVA) and near (DCNVA) visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, HOAs, and subjective symptom questionnaires were compared at 1 month postoperatively.

RESULTS:

Forty-five eyes from 45 patients were evaluated (n = 25, 9, and 11 eyes in the inferior, superior, and temporal groups, respectively). No significant differences in UDVA, UIVA, UNVA, CDVA, DCIVA, or DCNVA were found between the three groups (P > .05). The temporal group showed the best results in UDVA, CDVA, and DCNVA, but the inferior group showed the best results in DCIVA and UNVA and the superior group showed the best results in UIVA. Contrast sensitivity and the subjective symptom questionnaire also did not demonstrate any significant differences (P > .05). Total HOA and spherical aberration did not demonstrate any statistically significant differences (P > .05), but vertical coma and horizontal coma demonstrated significant differences based on near segment position (P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS:

The position of the near segment in eyes with rotationally asymmetric multifocal IOLs demonstrates no significant effect on visual performance.

[J Refract Surg. 2016;32(4):238–243.]

  • 1.Alió JL, Piñero DP, Plaza-Puche AB, Chan MJ. Visual outcomes and optical performance of a monofocal intraocular lens and a new-generation multifocal intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2011; 37:241–250.10.1016/j.jcrs.2010.08.043

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 2.Muñoz G, Albarrán-Diego C, Ferrer-Blasco T, Sakla HF, García-Lázaro S. Visual function after bilateral implantation of a new zonal refractive aspheric multifocal intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2011; 37:2043–2052.10.1016/j.jcrs.2011.05.045

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 3.Alió JL, Plaza-Puche AB, Javaloy J, Ayala MJ, Moreno LJ, Piñero DP. Comparison of a new refractive multifocal intraocular lens with an inferior segmental near add and a diffractive multifocal intraocular lens. Ophthalmology. 2012; 119:555–563.10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.08.036

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 4.Muñoz G, Albarrán-Diego C, Javaloy J, Sakla HF, Cerviño A. Combining zonal refractive and diffractive aspheric multifocal intraocular lenses. J Refract Surg. 2012; 28:174–181.10.3928/1081597X-20120215-02

    LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 5.Alió JL, Plaza-Puche AB, Montalban R, Javaloy J. Visual outcomes with a single-optic accommodating intraocular lens and a low-addition-power rotational asymmetric multifocal intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2012; 38:978–985.10.1016/j.jcrs.2011.12.033

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 6.McAlinden C, Moore JE. Multifocal intraocular lens with a surface-embedded near section: short-term clinical outcomes. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2011; 37:441–445.10.1016/j.jcrs.2010.08.055

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 7.Alfonso JF, Fernández-Vega L, Blázquez JI, Montés-Micó R. Visual function comparison of 2 aspheric multifocal intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2012; 38:242–248.10.1016/j.jcrs.2011.08.034

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 8.Alió JL, Plaza-Puche AB, Javaloy J, Ayala MJ. Comparison of the visual and intraocular optical performance of a refractive multifocal IOL with rotational asymmetry and an apodized diffractive multifocal IOL. J Refract Surg. 2012; 28:100–105.10.3928/1081597X-20120110-01

    LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 9.Alió JL, Plaza-Puche AB, Javaloy J, Ayala MJ, Vega-Estrada A. Clinical and optical intraocular performance of rotationally asymmetric multifocal IOL plate-haptic design versus C-loop haptic design. J Refract Surg. 2013; 29:252–259.10.3928/1081597X-20130318-04

    LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 10.Alió JL, Plaza-Puche AB, Piñero DP. Rotationally asymmetric multifocal IOL implantation with and without capsular tension ring: refractive and visual outcomes and intraocular optical performance. J Refract Surg. 2012; 28:253–258.10.3928/1081597X-20120314-01

    LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 11.Alió JL, Plaza-Puche AB, Piñero DP, Javaloy J, Ayala MJ. Comparative analysis of the clinical outcomes with 2 multifocal intraocular lens models with rotational asymmetry. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2011; 37:1605–1614.10.1016/j.jcrs.2011.03.054

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 12.Ramón ML, Piñero DP, Pérez-Cambrodí RJ. Correlation of visual performance with quality of life and intraocular aberrometric profile in patients implanted with rotationally asymmetric multifocal IOLs. J Refract Surg. 2012; 28:93–99.10.3928/1081597X-20111213-02

    LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 13.van der Linden JW, van Velthoven M, van der Meulen I, Nieuwendaal C, Mourits M, Lapid-Gortzak R. Comparison of a new-generation sectorial addition multifocal intraocular lens and a diffractive apodized multifocal intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2012; 38:68–73.10.1016/j.jcrs.2011.06.034

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 14.Venter JA, Pelouskova M, Collins BM, Schallhorn SC, Hannan SJ. Visual outcomes and patient satisfaction in 9366 eyes using a refractive segmented multifocal intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2013; 39:1477–1484.10.1016/j.jcrs.2013.03.035

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 15.Rosa AM, Loureiro Silva MF, Lobo C, et al.Comparison of visual function after bilateral implantation of inferior sector-shaped near-addition and diffractive-refractive multifocal IOLs. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2013; 39:1653–1659.10.1016/j.jcrs.2013.05.047

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 16.Venter JA, Pelouskova M, Bull CE, Schallhorn SC, Hannan SJ. Visual outcomes and patient satisfaction with a rotational asymmetric refractive intraocular lens for emmetropic presbyopia. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2015; 41:585–593.10.1016/j.jcrs.2014.06.035

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 17.Bala C, Meades K. Improvement in vision with inverted placement of an asymmetric refractive multifocal intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2014; 40:833–835.10.1016/j.jcrs.2014.02.012

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

We use cookies on this site to enhance your user experience. For a complete overview of all the cookies used, please see our privacy policy.

×