Lower Energy Levels Improve Visual Recovery in Small Incision Lenticule Extraction (SMILE)
Abstract
PURPOSE:
To compare the visual outcomes with energy close to the plasma threshold and energy at the standard set-up in small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE).
METHODS:
This retrospective, non-randomized, consecutive clinical case series included 486 eyes of 243 patients who underwent SMILE and were subdivided into two groups depending on the laser energy settings: the standard energy group (164 eyes) using a laser cut energy index of 36 (180 nJ), and the plasma threshold group (322 eyes) using a cut energy index of 20 (100 nJ, close to plasma threshold). A spot spacing of 4.5 µm was used in both groups. Safety, efficacy, predictability, and ocular optical quality outcomes were evaluated and compared among groups during a 3-month postoperative follow-up.
RESULTS:
Significantly better uncorrected (UDVA) and corrected (CDVA) distance visual acuity was found in the plasma threshold group throughout the follow-up (P ≤ .01). A higher percentage of eyes with 20/20 or better UDVA was found in the plasma threshold group at 1 day, 1 month, and 3 months postoperatively. At 1 and 3 months after surgery, no losses of two or more lines of CDVA were found in the plasma threshold group, whereas in the standard energy group these losses were observed in 3.8% and 2.7% of eyes, respectively. Significantly better postoperative modulation transfer function (P ≤ .02) and a lower level of higher order aberrations were found in the plasma threshold group compared to the standard energy group (P ≤ .025).
CONCLUSIONS:
An energy level close to the plasma threshold during SMILE provides a faster and better visual recovery.
[J Refract Surg. 2016;32(9):636–642.]
- 1.Sekundo W, Kunert K, Russmann C, First efficacy and safety study of femtosecond lenticule extraction for the correction of myopia: six months results. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008; 34:1513–1520. Erratum in: J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008;34:1819.
10.1016/j.jcrs.2008.05.033 > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar - 2.Sekundo W, Kunert KS, Blum M. Small incision corneal refractive surgery using the small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) procedure for the correction of myopia and myopic astigmatism: results of a 6 month prospective study. Br J Ophthalmol. 2011; 95:335–339.
10.1136/bjo.2009.174284 > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar - 3.Shah R, Shah S, Sengupta S. Results of small incision lenticule extraction: all-in-one femtosecond laser refractive surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2011; 37:127–137.
10.1016/j.jcrs.2010.07.033 > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar - 4.Verstergaard A, Ivarsen AR, Asp S, Hjortdal JØ. Small-incision lenticule extraction for moderate or high myopia: predictability, safety, and patient satisfaction. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2012; 38:2003–2010.
10.1016/j.jcrs.2012.07.021 > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar - 5.Hjortdal JO, Vestergaard AH, Ivarsen A, Ragunathan S, Asp S. Predictors for the outcome of small-incision lenticule extraction for myopia. J Refract Surg. 2012; 28:865–871.
10.3928/1081597X-20121115-01 > LinkGoogle Scholar - 6.Sekundo W, Gertnere J, Bertelmann T, Solomatin I. One-year refractive results, contrast sensitivity, high-order aberrations and complications after myopic small-incision lenticule extraction (ReLEx SMILE). Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2014; 252:837–843.
10.1007/s00417-014-2608-4 > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar - 7.Reinstein DZ, Carp GI, Archer TJ, Gobbe M. Outcomes of small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) in low myopia. J Refract Surg. 2014; 30:812–818. Erratum in: J Refract Surg. 2015;31:60.
10.3928/1081597X-20141113-07 > LinkGoogle Scholar - 8.Shah R, Shah S. Effect of scanning patterns on the results of femtosecond laser lenticule extraction refractive surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2011; 37:1636–1647.
10.1016/j.jcrs.2011.03.056 > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar - 9.Kamiya K, Shimizu K, Igarashi A, Kobashi H. Visual and refractive outcomes of femtosecond lenticule extraction and small-incision lenticule extraction for myopia. Am J Ophthalmol. 2014; 157:128–134.
10.1016/j.ajo.2013.08.011 > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar - 10.Demirok A, Agca A, Ozgurhan EB, Femtosecond lenticule extraction for correction of myopia: a 6 month follow-up study. Clin Ophthalmol. 2013; 7:1041–1047. > MedlineGoogle Scholar
- 11.Donate D, Albert O, Colliac JP, Femtosecond laser: a micromachining system for corneal surgery [article in French]. J Fr Ophtalmol. 2004; 25:783–789.
10.1016/S0181-5512(04)96214-6 > CrossrefGoogle Scholar - 12.Lin F, Xu Y, Yang Y. Comparison of the visual results after SMILE and femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK for myopia. J Refract Surg. 2014; 30:248–254. Erratum in: J Refractive Surg. 2014;30:582.
10.3928/1081597X-20140320-03 > LinkGoogle Scholar - 13.Moshirfar M, McCaughey MV, Reinstein DZ, Shah R, Santiago-Caban L, Fenzl CR. Small-incision lenticule extraction. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2015; 41:652–665.
10.1016/j.jcrs.2015.02.006 > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar - 14.Pedersen IB, Ivarsen A, Hjortdal J. Three-year results of small incision lenticule extraction for high myopia: refractive outcomes and aberrations. J Refract Surg. 2015; 31:719–724.
10.3928/1081597X-20150923-11 > LinkGoogle Scholar - 15.Netto MV, Mohan RR, Medeiros FW, Femtosecond laser and microkeratome corneal flaps: comparison of stromal wound healing and inflammation. J Refract Surg. 2007; 23:667–676. > LinkGoogle Scholar
- 16.Juhasz T, Kastis GA, Suárez C, Bor Z, Bron WE. Time-resolved observations of shock waves and cavitation bubbles generated by femtosecond laser pulses in corneal tissue and water. Lasers Surg Med. 1996; 19:23–31.
10.1002/(SICI)1096-9101(1996)19:1<23::AID-LSM4>3.0.CO;2-S > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar - 17.Serrao S, Buratto L, Lombardo G, De Santo MP, Ducoli P, Lombardo M. Optimal parameters to improve the interface quality of the flap bed in femtosecond laser-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2012; 38:1453–1459.
10.1016/j.jcrs.2012.05.021 > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar - 18.Kamiya K, Shimizu K, Igarashi A, Kobashi H. Effect of femtosecond laser setting on visual performance after small-incision lenticule extraction for myopia. Br J Ophthalmol. 2015; 99:1381–1387.
10.1136/bjophthalmol-2015-306717 > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar - 19.Kim JR, Hwang HB, Mun SJ, Chung YT, Kim HS. Efficacy, predictability, and safety of small incision lenticule extraction: 6-months prospective cohort study. BMC Ophthalmol. 2014; 14:117.
10.1186/1471-2415-14-117 > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
