Original Article
Comparison of Corneal Epithelial Remodeling After Femtosecond Laser–Assisted LASIK and Small Incision Lenticule Extraction (SMILE)
Abstract
PURPOSE:
To comparatively investigate changes in epithelial thickness between myopic femtosecond laser–assisted LASIK (FS-LASIK) and small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE).
METHODS:
This study compared the topographic epithelial thickness changes in 175 myopic eyes undergoing FS-LASIK (62 eyes) or SMILE (113 eyes). Epithelial thickness was obtained using spectral-domain optical coherence tomography before surgery and 1 and 3 months after surgery. Topographic epithelial thickness obtained by automatic algorithm and thickness variability (standard deviation over 17 imaged areas) was compared between two groups. Postoperative epithelial thickness changes were correlated with treatment parameters.
RESULTS:
For FS-LASIK, the mean epithelial thickness of the center zone (2 mm in diameter), paracenter (2 to 5 mm), and mid-periphery (5 to 6 mm) increased by 3.4, 4.3, and 2.1 µm, respectively, at 1 month and by 4.4, 5.1, and 2.9 µm, respectively, at 3 months. There was an increase of 2.5, 3.9, and 4.5 µm, respectively, at 1 month and 3.0, 4.2, and 4.9 µm, respectively, at 3 months following SMILE. The epithelial thickness did not change between 1 and 3 months postoperatively following SMILE, whereas it increased further after FS-LASIK. A larger increase of epithelial thickness was observed in the central zone at 3 months following FS-LASIK than SMILE, whereas the opposite was observed in the mid-periphery. The topographic thickness variability was greater after FS-LASIK than SMILE. Corneal epithelial thickening was proportional to the amount of myopia correction after both procedures.
CONCLUSIONS:
Topographic epithelial remodeling patterns differ following FS-LASIK or SMILE. Epithelial remodeling appears to stabilize more rapidly following SMILE than FS-LASIK.
[J Refract Surg. 2017;33(4):250–256.]
- 1.Montes-Mico R, Rodriguez-Galietero A, Alio JL. Femtosecond laser versus mechanical keratome LASIK for myopia. Ophthalmology. 2007; 114:62–68.
10.1016/j.ophtha.2006.07.019 Crossref Medline, Google Scholar - 2.Kymionis GD, Kankariya VP, Plaka AD, Reinstein DZ. Femtosecond laser technology in corneal refractive surgery: a review. J Refract Surg. 2012; 28:912–920.
10.3928/1081597X-20121116-01 Link, Google Scholar - 3.Sekundo W, Kunert KS, Blum M. Small incision corneal refractive surgery using the small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) procedure for the correction of myopia and myopic astigmatism: results of a 6 month prospective study. Br J Ophthalmol. 2011; 95:335–339.
10.1136/bjo.2009.174284 Crossref Medline, Google Scholar - 4.Wang D, Liu M, Chen Y, Differences in the corneal biomechanical changes after SMILE and LASIK. J Refract Surg. 2014; 30:702–707.
10.3928/1081597X-20140903-09 Link, Google Scholar - 5.Shen Y, Chen Z, Knorz MC, Li M, Zhao J, Zhou X. Comparison of corneal deformation parameters after SMILE, LASEK, and femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK. J Refract Surg. 2014; 30:310–318.
10.3928/1081597X-20140422-01 Link, Google Scholar - 6.Reinstein DZ, Archer TJ, Gobbe M. Lenticule thickness readout for small incision lenticule extraction compared to Artemis three-dimensional very high-frequency digital ultrasound stromal measurements. J Refract Surg. 2014; 30:304–309.
10.3928/1081597X-20140416-01 Link, Google Scholar - 7.Ganesh S, Gupta R. Comparison of visual and refractive outcomes following femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK with SMILE in patients with myopia or myopic astigmatism. J Refract Surg. 2014; 30:590–596.
10.3928/1081597X-20140814-02 Link, Google Scholar - 8.Lin F, Xu Y, Yang Y. Comparison of the visual results after SMILE and femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK for myopia. J Refract Surg. 2014; 30:248–254. Erratum in: J Refract Surg. 2014;30:382.
10.3928/1081597X-20140320-03 Link, Google Scholar - 9.Liu M, Chen Y, Wang D, Clinical outcomes after SMILE and femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK for myopia and myopic astigmatism: a prospective randomized comparative study. Cornea. 2016; 35:210–216.
10.1097/ICO.0000000000000707 Crossref Medline, Google Scholar - 10.Li Y, Tan O, Brass R, Weiss JL, Huang D. Corneal epithelial thickness mapping by Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography in normal and keratoconic eyes. Ophthalmology. 2012; 119:2425–2433.
10.1016/j.ophtha.2012.06.023 Crossref Medline, Google Scholar - 11.Kanellopoulos AJ, Asimellis G. In vivo three-dimensional corneal epithelium imaging in normal eyes by anterior-segment optical coherence tomography: a clinical reference study. Cornea. 2013; 32:1493–1498.
10.1097/ICO.0b013e3182a15cee Crossref Medline, Google Scholar - 12.Ma XJ, Wang L, Koch DD. Repeatability of corneal epithelial thickness measurements using Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography in normal and post-LASIK eyes. Cornea. 2013; 32:1544–1548.
10.1097/ICO.0b013e3182a7f39d Crossref Medline, Google Scholar - 13.Kanellopoulos AJ, Asimellis G. OCT corneal epithelial topographic asymmetry as a sensitive diagnostic tool for early and advancing keratoconus. Clin Ophthalmol. 2014; 8:2277–2287.
10.2147/OPTH.S67902 Crossref Medline, Google Scholar - 14.Kim BJ, Ryu IH, Kim SW. Age-related differences in corneal epithelial thickness measurements with anterior segment optical coherence tomography. Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2016; 60:357–364.
10.1007/s10384-016-0457-x Crossref Medline, Google Scholar - 15.Spadea L, Fasciani R, Necozione S, Balestrazzi E. Role of the corneal epithelium in refractive changes following laser in situ keratomileusis for high myopia. J Refract Surg. 2000; 16:133–139. Link, Google Scholar
- 16.Erie JC, Patel SV, McLaren JW, Effect of myopic laser in situ keratomileusis on epithelial and stromal thickness: a confocal microscopy study. Ophthalmology. 2002; 109:1447–1452.
10.1016/S0161-6420(02)01106-5 Crossref Medline, Google Scholar - 17.Patel SV, Erie JC, McLaren JW, Bourne WM. Confocal microscopy changes in epithelial and stromal thickness up to 7 years after LASIK and photorefractive keratectomy for myopia. J Refract Surg. 2007; 23:385–392. Link, Google Scholar
- 18.Ivarsen A, Fledelius W, Hjortdal JO. Three-year changes in epithelial and stromal thickness after PRK or LASIK for high myopia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2009; 50:2061–2066.
10.1167/iovs.08-2853 Crossref Medline, Google Scholar - 19.Reinstein DZ, Srivannaboon S, Gobbe M, Epithelial thickness profile changes induced by myopic LASIK as measured by Artemis very high-frequency digital ultrasound. J Refract Surg. 2009; 25:444–450.
10.3928/1081597X-20090422-07 Link, Google Scholar - 20.Kanellopoulos AJ, Asimellis G. Epithelial remodeling after femtosecond laser-assisted high myopic LASIK: comparison of stand-alone with LASIK combined with prophylactic high-fluence cross-linking. Cornea. 2014; 33:463–469.
10.1097/ICO.0000000000000087 Crossref Medline, Google Scholar - 21.Kanellopoulos AJ, Asimellis G. Longitudinal postoperative LASIK epithelial thickness profile changes in correlation with degree of myopia correction. J Refract Surg. 2014; 30:166–171. Medline, Google Scholar
- 22.Reinstein DZ, Archer TJ, Gobbe M. Change in epithelial thickness profile 24 hours and longitudinally for 1 year after myopic LASIK: three-dimensional display with Artemis very high-frequency digital ultrasound. J Refract Surg. 2012; 28:195–201.
10.3928/1081597X-20120127-02 Link, Google Scholar - 23.Rocha KM, Krueger RR. Spectral-domain optical coherence tomography epithelial and flap thickness mapping in femtosecond laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis. Am J Ophthalmol. 2014; 158:293–301.
10.1016/j.ajo.2014.04.012 Crossref Medline, Google Scholar - 24.Vestergaard AH, Grauslund J, Ivarsen AR, Hjortdal JO. Central corneal sublayer pachymetry and biomechanical properties after refractive femtosecond lenticule extraction. J Refract Surg. 2014; 30:102–108.
10.3928/1081597X-20140120-05 Link, Google Scholar - 25.Luft N, Ring MH, Dirisamer M, Semiautomated SD-OCT measurements of corneal sublayer thickness in normal and post-SMILE eyes. Cornea. 2016; 35:972–979.
10.1097/ICO.0000000000000799 Crossref Medline, Google Scholar - 26.Kim BJ, Ryu IH, Lee JH, Kim SW. Correlation of sex and myopia with corneal epithelial and stromal thicknesses. Cornea. 2016; 35:1078–1083.
10.1097/ICO.0000000000000850 Crossref Medline, Google Scholar - 27.Reinstein DZ, Archer TJ, Gobbe M, Silverman RH, Coleman DJ. Epithelial thickness after hyperopic LASIK: three-dimensional display with Artemis very high-frequency digital ultrasound. J Refract Surg. 2010; 26:555–564.
10.3928/1081597X-20091105-02 Link, Google Scholar - 28.Tang M, Li Y, Huang D. Corneal epithelial remodeling after LASIK measured by Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography. J Ophthalmol. 2015; 2015:860313.
10.1155/2015/860313 Crossref Medline, Google Scholar - 29.Chen X, Stojanovic A, Liu Y, Chen Y, Zhou Y, Utheim TP. Postoperative changes in corneal epithelial and stromal thickness profiles after photorefractive keratectomy in treatment of myopia. J Refract Surg. 2015; 31:446–453.
10.3928/1081597X-20150623-02 Link, Google Scholar - 30.Reinstein DZ, Archer TJ, Gobbe M. Accuracy and reproducibility of cap thickness in small incision lenticule extraction. J Refract Surg. 2013; 29:810–815.
10.3928/1081597X-20131023-02 Link, Google Scholar
