Skip to main content
Published Online:https://doi.org/10.3928/1081597X-20170621-08Cited by:32

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Clinical evaluation of an extended depth of focus (EDOF) intraocular lens (IOL) regarding visual performance at various distances, reading performance on an electronic reading desk, and depth of focus on the defocus curve.

METHODS:

In this prospective study, 30 eyes of 15 patients who received the Tecnis Symfony IOL (Abbott Medical Optics, Inc., Santa Ana, CA) were examined 3.60 ± 1.54 months postoperatively. Uncorrected and corrected distance (UDVA and CDVA), uncorrected and distance-corrected intermediate (UIVA and DCIVA), and uncorrected and distance-corrected near (UNVA and DCNVA) visual acuity were determined. The defocus curve was performed with distance correction. Furthermore, the reading acuity at the preferred near and intermediate distances was measured with consideration of the reading distance, speed, and print size. A subjective questionnaire was also administered.

RESULTS:

Results showed a median UDVA of 0.03 logMAR or 20/21.43 Snellen (range: 0.44 to −0.18 logMAR or 20/55.08 to 20/13.21 Snellen), UNVA of 0.20 logMAR or 20/31.70 Snellen (range: 0.46 to 0.00 logMAR or 20/57.68 to 20/20 Snellen), and UIVA of −0.03 logMAR or 20/18.67 Snellen (range: 0.14 to −0.18 logMAR or 20/27.61 to 20/13.21 Snellen). The improved performance at intermediate distance was confirmed by an uncorrected reading acuity of 0.09 logMAR or 20/24.61 Snellen (range: 0.36 to 0.00 logMAR or 20/45.82 to 20/20.00 Snellen) at a preferred intermediate distance of 64.10 cm (range: 52.0 to 75.0 cm). The defocus curve showed an extended range of visual acuity of 0.10 logMAR or better between 1.00 and −1.50 diopters.

CONCLUSIONS:

The EDOF IOL design provided a wide range of improved visual and reading function between far and intermediate distances and also improved near visual acuity. Patients reported a high rate of satisfaction and spectacle independence at the various distances.

[J Refract Surg. 2017;33(10):664–669.]

  • 1.Auffarth GU, Rabsilber TM, Kohnen T, Holzer MP. Design and optical principles of multifocal lenses [article in German]. Ophthalmologe. 2008; 105:522–526.10.1007/s00347-008-1744-9

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 2.Auffarth GU, Dick HB. Multifocal intraocular lenses: a review [article in German]. Ophthalmologe. 2001; 98:127–137.10.1007/s003470170172

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 3.Keates RH, Pearce JL, Schneider RT. Clinical results of the multifocal lens. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1987; 13:557–560.10.1016/S0886-3350(87)80114-1

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 4.Rasp M, Bachernegg A, Seyeddain O, et al.Bilateral reading performance of 4 multifocal intraocular lens models and a monofocal intraocular lens under bright lighting conditions. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2012; 38:1950–1961.10.1016/j.jcrs.2012.07.027

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 5.Madrid-Costa D, Ruiz-Alcocer J, Ferrer-Blasco T, García-Lázaro S, Montés-Micó R. Optical quality differences between three multifocal intraocular lenses: bifocal low add, bifocal moderate add, and trifocal. J Refract Surg. 2013; 29:749–754.10.3928/1081597X-20131021-04

    LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 6.Gatinel D, Pagnoulle C, Houbrechts Y, Gobin L. Design and qualification of a diffractive trifocal optical profile for intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2011; 37:2060–2067.10.1016/j.jcrs.2011.05.047

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 7.Alió JL, Montalbán R, Peña-García P, Soria FA, Vega-Estrada A. Visual outcomes of a trifocal aspheric diffractive intraocular lens with microincision cataract surgery. J Refract Surg. 2013; 29:756–761.10.3928/1081597X-20131021-05

    LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 8.Mojzis P, Peña-García P, Liehneova I, Ziak P, Alió JL. Outcomes of a new diffractive trifocal intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2014; 40:60–69.10.1016/j.jcrs.2013.06.025

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 9.Dexl AK, Schlögel H, Wolfbauer M, Grabner G. Device for improving quantification of reading acuity and reading speed. J Refract Surg. 2010; 26:682–688.10.3928/1081597X-20091119-01

    LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 10.Dexl AK, Seyeddain O, Riha W, et al.Reading performance after implantation of a modified corneal inlay design for the surgical correction of presbyopia: 1-year follow-up. Am J Ophthalmol. 2012; 153:994–1001.10.1016/j.ajo.2011.08.044

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 11.Dexl AK, Seyeddain O, Riha W, et al.Reading performance and patient satisfaction after corneal inlay implantation for presbyopia correction: two-year follow-up. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2012; 38:1808–1816.10.1016/j.jcrs.2012.06.047

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 12.Hirnschall N, Motaabbed JK, Dexl A, Grabner G, Findl O. Evaluation of an electronic reading desk to measure reading acuity in pseudophakic patients. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2014; 40:1462–1468.10.1016/j.jcrs.2013.12.021

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 13.Rubin GS, West SK, Munoz B, et al.A comprehensive assessment of visual impairment in a population of older Americans. The SEE Study. Salisbury Eye Evaluation Project. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1997; 38:557–568.

    MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 14.Whittaker SG, Lovie-Kitchin J. Visual requirements for reading. Optom Vis Sci. 1993; 70:54–65.10.1097/00006324-199301000-00010

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 15.Attia MS, Auffarth GU, Khoramnia R, Linz K, Kretz FT. Near and intermediate reading performance of a diffractive trifocal intraocular lens using a reading desk. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2015; 41:2707–2714.10.1016/j.jcrs.2015.06.038

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 16.Attia MS, Khoramnia R, Auffarth GU, Kirchner M, Holzer MP. Near and intermediate visual and reading performance of patients with a multifocal apodized diffractive intraocular lens using an electronic reading desk. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2016; 42:582–590.10.1016/j.jcrs.2015.11.047

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 17.Alió JL, Plaza-Puche AB, Piñero DP, Amparo F, Rodríguez-Prats JL, Ayala MJ. Quality of life evaluation after implantation of 2 multifocal intraocular lens models and a monofocal model. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2011; 37:638–648.10.1016/j.jcrs.2010.10.056

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 18.Alió JL, Grabner G, Plaza-Puche AB, et al.Postoperative bilateral reading performance with 4 intraocular lens models: six-month results. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2011; 37:842–852.10.1016/j.jcrs.2010.11.039

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 19.Sheppard AL, Shah S, Bhatt U, Bhogal G, Wolffsohn JS. Visual outcomes and subjective experience after bilateral implantation of a new diffractive trifocal intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2013; 39:343–349.10.1016/j.jcrs.2012.09.017

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

We use cookies on this site to enhance your user experience. For a complete overview of all the cookies used, please see our privacy policy.

×