Skip to main content
Published Online:https://doi.org/10.3928/1081597X-20180402-03Cited by:2

Abstract

PURPOSE:

To evaluate remodeling of the corneal epithelium after epithelium-off corneal cross-linking (CXL).

METHODS:

In this prospective single-center study, 93 eyes of 93 patients with progressive keratoconus underwent standard CXL. The maximum keratometry was assessed before and after CXL with Scheimpflug imaging, and the epithelial thickness profile across the central 5 mm of the cornea was assessed with spectral-domain optical coherence tomography anterior segment imaging.

RESULTS:

The mean patient age was 27 ± 11 years; 76 patients (81%) were male and 17 (19%) were female. Between baseline and 6 months after CXL, the mean corneal maximum keratometry flattened from 58.90 to 57.80 diopters (P < .0001). The mean minimum epithelial thickness increased slightly (from 41 ± 6 to 42 ± 7 μm, P = .12), whereas the mean maximum epithelial thickness decreased slightly (from 65 ± 6 to 64 ± 7 μm, P = .067), reducing the net difference between the minimum and maximum epithelial thickness (from 24 ± 9 to 22 ± 9 μm, P = .0023). The difference between the minimum and maximum epithelial thickness was strongly positively correlated with the maximum keratometry reading at baseline (R2 = 0.38) and at 6 months after CXL (R2 = 0.59).

CONCLUSIONS:

Epithelium-off CXL resulted in modest regularization of the epithelial thickness profile across the central 5 mm of the cornea at 6 months. This could slightly mask flattening of the underlying stroma.

[J Refract Surg. 2018;34(6):408–412.]

  • 1.Rabinowitz YS. Keratoconus. Surv Ophthalmol. 1998; 42:297–319.10.1016/S0039-6257(97)00119-7

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 2.Jinabhai A, Radhakrishnan H, O'Donnell C. Pellucid corneal marginal degeneration: a review. Contact Lens Anterior Eye. 2011; 34:56–63.10.1016/j.clae.2010.11.007

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 3.Reinstein DZ, Gobbe M, Archer TJ, Silverman RH, Coleman DJ. Epithelial, stromal, and total corneal thickness in keratoconus: three-dimensional display with Artemis very-high frequency digital ultrasound. J Refract Surg. 2010; 26:259–271.10.3928/1081597X-20100218-01

    LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 4.Reinstein DZ, Archer TJ, Gobbe M. Corneal epithelial thickness profile in the diagnosis of keratoconus. J Refract Surg. 2009; 25:604–610.

    LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 5.Li Y, Tan O, Brass R, Weiss JL, Huang D. Corneal epithelial thickness mapping by Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography in normal and keratoconic eyes. Ophthalmology. 2012; 119:2425–2433.10.1016/j.ophtha.2012.06.023

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 6.Reinstein DZ, Archer TJ, Gobbe M. Stability of LASIK in topographically suspect keratoconus confirmed non-keratoconic by Artemis VHF digital ultrasound epithelial thickness mapping: 1-year follow-up. J Refract Surg. 2009; 25:569–577.

    LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 7.Li HF, Petroll WM, Moller-Pedersen T, Mauer JK, Cavanaugh HD, Jester JV. Epithelial and corneal thickness measurements by in vivo confocal microscopy through focusing (CMTF). Curr Eye Res. 1997; 16:214–221.10.1076/ceyr.16.3.214.15412

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 8.Erie JC, Patel SV, McLaren JW, et al.Effect of myopic laser in situ keratomileusis on epithelial and stromal thickness: a confocal microscopy study. Ophthalmology. 2002; 109:1447–1452.10.1016/S0161-6420(02)01106-5

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 9.Sin S, Simpson TL. The repeatability of corneal and corneal epithelial thickness measurements using optical coherence tomography. Optom Vis Sci. 2006; 83:360–365.10.1097/01.opx.0000221388.26031.23

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 10.Wang J, Fonn D, Simpson TL, Jones L. The measurement of corneal epithelial thickness in response to hypoxia using optical coherence tomography. Am J Ophthalmol. 2002; 133:315–319.10.1016/S0002-9394(01)01382-4

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 11.Ko TH, Fujimoto JG, Duker JS, et al.Comparison of ultrahighand standard-resolution optical coherence tomography for imaging macular hole pathology and repair. Ophthalmology. 2004; 111:2033–2043.10.1016/j.ophtha.2004.05.021

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 12.Li Y, Tang ML, Zhang XB, Salaroli CH, Ramos JL, Huang D. Pachymetric mapping with Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2010; 36:826–831.10.1016/j.jcrs.2009.11.016

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 13.Sarunic MV, Asrani S, Izatt JA. Imaging the ocular anterior segment with real-time, full-range Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography. Arch Ophthalmol. 2008; 126:537–542.10.1001/archopht.126.4.537

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 14.Wojtkowski M, Leitgeb R, Kowalczyk A, Najraszewski T, Fercher AF. In vivo human retinal imaging by Fourier domain optical coherence tomography. J Biomed Opt. 2002; 7:457–463.10.1117/1.1482379

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 15.Yasuno Y, Madjarova VD, Makita S, et al.Three-dimensional and high-speed swept-source optical coherence tomography for in vivo investigation of human anterior eye segments. Opt Express. 2005; 13:10652–10664.10.1364/OPEX.13.010652

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 16.Raiskup F, Spoerl E. Corneal crosslinking with riboflavin and ultraviolet A: I. Principles. Ocul Surf. 2013; 11:65–74.10.1016/j.jtos.2013.01.002

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 17.Rocha KM, Perez-Straziota CE, Stulting RD, Randleman JB. Epithelial and stromal remodeling after corneal collagen cross-linking evaluated by spectral-domain OCT. J Refract Surg. 2014; 30:122–127.10.3928/1081597X-20140120-08

    LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 18.Kanellopoulos AJ, Asimellis G. Epithelial remodeling after partial topography-guided normalization and high-fluence short-duration crosslinking (Athens protocol): results up to 1 year. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2014; 40:1597–1602.10.1016/j.jcrs.2014.02.036

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 19.Price MO, Fairchild KM, Feng MT, Price FW. Prospective randomized trial of corneal cross-linking riboflavin dosing frequencies for treatment of keratoconus and corneal ectasia. Ophthalmology. 2018; 125:505–511.10.1016/j.ophtha.2017.10.034

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 20.Wollensak G, Spoerl E, Seiler T. Riboflavin/ultraviolet-a-induced collagen crosslinking for the treatment of keratoconus. Am J Ophthalmol. 2003; 135:620–627.10.1016/S0002-9394(02)02220-1

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 21.Reinstein DZ, Archer TJ, Gobbe M, Silverman RH, Coleman DJ. Epithelial thickness in the normal cornea: three-dimensional display with Artemis very high-frequency digital ultrasound. J Refract Surg. 2008; 24:571–581.

    LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 22.Rocha KM, Perez-Straziota CE, Stulting RD, Randleman JB. SDOCT analysis of regional epithelial thickness profiles in keratoconus, postoperative corneal ectasia, and normal eyes. J Refract Surg. 2013; 29:173–179. Erratum in: J Refract Surg. 2013;29:234.10.3928/1081597X-20130129-08

    LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 23.Li Y, Shekhar R, Huang D. Corneal pachymetry mapping with high-speed optical coherence tomography. Ophthalmology. 2006; 113:792–799.10.1016/j.ophtha.2006.01.048

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 24.Prospero Ponce CM, Rocha KM, Smith SD, Krueger RR. Central and peripheral corneal thickness measured with optical coherence tomography, Scheimpflug imaging, and ultrasound pachymetry in normal, keratoconus-suspect, and post-laser in situ keratomileusis eyes. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2009; 35:1055–1062.10.1016/j.jcrs.2009.01.022

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 25.Kanellopoulos AJ, Aslanides IM, Asimellis G. Correlation between epithelial thickness in normal corneas, untreated ectatic corneas, and ectatic corneas previously treated with CXL: is overall epithelial thickness a very early ectasia prognostic factor?Clin Ophthalmol. 2012; 6:789–800.10.2147/OPTH.S31524

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 26.Kanellopoulos AJ, Asimellis G. In vivo three-dimensional corneal epithelium imaging in normal eyes by anterior-segment optical coherence tomography: a clinical reference study. Cornea. 2013; 32:1493–1498.10.1097/ICO.0b013e3182a15cee

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 27.Kanellopoulos AJ, Asimellis G. OCT corneal epithelial topographic asymmetry as a sensitive diagnostic tool for early and advancing keratoconus. Clin Ophthalmol. 2014; 8:2277–2287.10.2147/OPTH.S67902

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 28.Reinstein DZ, Gobbe M, Archer TJ, Couch D. Epithelial thickness profile as a method to evaluate the effectiveness of collagen cross-linking treatment after corneal ectasia. J Refract Surg. 2011; 27:356–363.10.3928/1081597X-20100930-01

    LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 29.Wang J, Thomas J, Cox I, Rollins A. Noncontact measurements of central corneal epithelial and flap thickness after laser in situ keratomileusis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2004; 45:1812–1816.10.1167/iovs.03-1088

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

We use cookies on this site to enhance your user experience. For a complete overview of all the cookies used, please see our privacy policy.

×