Abstract
PURPOSE:
To identify the definitions used for the terms sub-clinical keratoconus and forme fruste keratoconus in published articles.
METHODS:
This was a prospective, systematic literature review of the electronic database in PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and LILACS Database of all studies using the keywords “subclinical keratoconus” and/or “forme fruste keratoconus” until August 18, 2017. Two independent reviewers analyzed the data. The inclusion criteria for articles were having analyzed subclinical keratoconus or forme fruste keratoconus eyes with a sample size greater than 10 eyes; containing the definition of subclinical keratoconus or forme fruste keratoconus; and the quality of published reports was assessed using standards quality index methods. The following aspects of the selected articles were then analyzed: inclusion criteria for definition and technology used.
RESULTS:
A total of 198 and 95 studies, respectively, including the definition of subclinical keratoconus and forme fruste keratoconus were collected in an initial search, of which 165 and 73 studies, respectively, were excluded. Definitions for subclinical keratoconus and forme fruste keratoconus included the criteria of having keratoconus in the fellow eye in 72.72% (24 of 33) and 77.27% (17 of 22) of the articles, respectively. A total of 96.97% (32 of 33) and 90.90% (20 of 22) of the studies used more than one parameter to define subclinical keratoconus and forme fruste keratoconus, respectively. The most common extra parameters included normal slit-lamp examination and cornea on slit-lamp biomicroscopy and inferior-superior asymmetry and/or bowtie pattern with skewed radial axes.
CONCLUSIONS:
This review demonstrates the lack of unified criteria to define subclinical keratoconus and forme fruste keratoconus. According to the literature review, the most common subclinical keratoconus definition used refers to an eye with topographic signs of keratoconus and/or suspicious topographic findings under normal slit-lamp examination and keratoconus in the fellow eye and the most common forme fruste keratoconus definition refers to an eye with normal topography, normal slit-lamp examination, and keratoconus in the fellow eye.
[J Refract Surg. 2020;36(4):270–279.]
- 1.Rabinowitz YS. Videokeratographic indices to aid in screening for keratoconus. J Refract Surg. 1995; 11(5):371–379. Link, Google Scholar
- 2.Gomes JAP, Tan D, Rapuano CJ, Group of Panelists for the Global Delphi Panel of Keratoconus and Ectatic Diseases. Global consensus on keratoconus and ectatic diseases. Cornea. 2015; 34(4):359–369.
10.1097/ICO.0000000000000408 Crossref Medline, Google Scholar - 3.Martínez-Abad A, Piñero DP. New perspectives on the detection and progression of keratoconus. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2017; 43(9):1213–1227.
10.1016/j.jcrs.2017.07.021 Crossref Medline, Google Scholar - 4.Downs SH, Black N. The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1998; 52(6):377–384.
10.1136/jech.52.6.377 Crossref Medline, Google Scholar - 5.Deeks JJ, Dinnes J, D'Amico R, International Stroke Trial Collaborative GroupEuropean Carotid Surgery Trial Collaborative Group. Evaluating non-randomised intervention studies. Health Technol Assess. 2003; 7(27):iii–x, 1–173.
10.3310/hta7270 Crossref Medline, Google Scholar - 6.Sideroudi H, Labiris G, Georgantzoglou K, Ntonti P, Siganos C, Kozobolis V. Fourier analysis algorithm for the posterior corneal keratometric data: clinical usefulness in keratoconus. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2017; 37(4):460–466.
10.1111/opo.12386 Crossref Medline, Google Scholar - 7.Peña-García P, Peris-Martínez C, Abbouda A, Ruiz-Moreno JM. Detection of subclinical keratoconus through non-contact tonometry and the use of discriminant biomechanical functions. J Biomech. 2016; 49(3):353–363.
10.1016/j.jbiomech.2015.12.031 Crossref Medline, Google Scholar - 8.Shetty R, Rao H, Khamar P, Keratoconus screening indices and their diagnostic ability to distinguish normal from ectatic corneas. Am J Ophthalmol. 2017; 181:140–148.
10.1016/j.ajo.2017.06.031 Crossref Medline, Google Scholar - 9.Vinciguerra R, Ambrósio R, Roberts CJ, Azzolini C, Vinciguerra P. Biomechanical characterization of subclinical keratoconus without topographic or tomographic abnormalities. J Refract Surg. 2017; 33(6):399–407.
10.3928/1081597X-20170213-01 Link, Google Scholar - 10.Martínez-Abad A, Piñero DP, Ruiz-Fortes P, Artola A. Evaluation of the diagnostic ability of vector parameters characterizing the corneal astigmatism and regularity in clinical and subclinical keratoconus. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2017; 40(2):88–96.
10.1016/j.clae.2016.11.008 Crossref Medline, Google Scholar - 11.Sideroudi H, Labiris G, Georgatzoglou K, Ditzel F, Siganos C, Kozobolis V. Fourier analysis of videokeratography data: clinical usefulness in grade I and subclinical keratoconus. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2016; 42(5):731–737.
10.1016/j.jcrs.2016.01.049 Crossref Medline, Google Scholar - 12.Hashemi H, Beiranvand A, Yekta A, Maleki A, Yazdani N, Khabazkhoob M. Pentacam top indices for diagnosing subclinical and definite keratoconus. J Curr Ophthalmol. 2016; 28(1):21–26.
10.1016/j.joco.2016.01.009 Crossref Medline, Google Scholar - 13.Feizi S, Yaseri M, Kheiri B. Predictive ability of Galilei to distinguish subclinical keratoconus and keratoconus from normal corneas. J Ophthalmic Vis Res. 2016; 11(1):8–16.
10.4103/2008-322X.180707 Crossref Medline, Google Scholar - 14.Li Y, Chamberlain W, Tan O, Brass R, Weiss JL, Huang D. Subclinical keratoconus detection by pattern analysis of corneal and epithelial thickness maps with optical coherence tomography. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2016; 42(2):284–295.
10.1016/j.jcrs.2015.09.021 Crossref Medline, Google Scholar - 15.Tummanapalli SS, Potluri H, Vaddavalli PK, Sangwan VS. Efficacy of axial and tangential corneal topography maps in detecting subclinical keratoconus. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2015; 41(10):2205–2214.
10.1016/j.jcrs.2015.10.041 Crossref Medline, Google Scholar - 16.Cui J, Zhang X, Hu Q, Zhou W-Y, Yang F. Evaluation of corneal thickness and volume parameters of subclinical keratoconus using a Pentacam Scheimflug system. Curr Eye Res. 2016; 41(7):923–926.
10.3109/02713683.2015.1082188 Crossref Medline, Google Scholar - 17.Steinberg J, Casagrande MK, Frings A, Screening for subclinical keratoconus using swept-source Fourier domain anterior segment optical coherence tomography. Cornea. 2015; 34(11):1413–1419.
10.1097/ICO.0000000000000568 Crossref Medline, Google Scholar - 18.Piñero DP, Pérez-Cambrodí RJ, Soto-Negro R, Ruiz-Fortes P, Artola A. Clinical utility of ocular residual astigmatism and topographic disparity vector indexes in subclinical and clinical keratoconus. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2015; 253(12):2229–2237.
10.1007/s00417-015-3169-x Crossref Medline, Google Scholar - 19.Steinberg J, Katz T, Lücke K, Frings A, Druchkiv V, Linke SJ. Screening for keratoconus with new dynamic biomechanical in vivo Scheimpflug analyses. Cornea. 2015; 34(11):1404–1412.
10.1097/ICO.0000000000000598 Crossref Medline, Google Scholar - 20.Galletti JD, Ruiseñor Vázquez PR, Fuentes Bonthoux F, Pförtner T, Galletti JG. Multivariate analysis of the Ocular Response Analyzer's corneal deformation response curve for early keratoconus detection. J Ophthalmol. 2015; 2015:496382.
10.1155/2015/496382 Crossref Medline, Google Scholar - 21.Jafarinasab MR, Shirzadeh E, Feizi S, Karimian F, Akaberi A, Hasanpour H. Sensitivity and specificity of posterior and anterior corneal elevation measured by Orbscan in diagnosis of clinical and subclinical keratoconus. J Ophthalmic Vis Res. 2015; 10(1):10–15.
10.4103/2008-322X.156085 Crossref Medline, Google Scholar - 22.Steinberg J, Aubke-Schultz S, Frings A, Correlation of the KISA% index and Scheimpflug tomography in ‘normal’, ‘sub-clinical’, ‘keratoconus-suspect’ and ‘clinically manifest’ keratoconus eyes. Acta Ophthalmol. 2015; 93(3):e199–e207.
10.1111/aos.12590 Crossref Medline, Google Scholar - 23.Muftuoglu O, Ayar O, Hurmeric V, Orucoglu F, Kilic I. Comparison of multimetric D index with keratometric, pachymetric, and posterior elevation parameters in diagnosing subclinical keratoconus in fellow eyes of asymmetric keratoconus patients. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2015; 41(3):557–565.
10.1016/j.jcrs.2014.05.052 Crossref Medline, Google Scholar - 24.Sahebjada S, Xie J, Chan E, Snibson G, Daniel M, Baird PN. Assessment of anterior segment parameters of keratoconus eyes in an Australian population. Optom Vis Sci. 2014; 91(7):803–809.
10.1097/OPX.0000000000000295 Crossref Medline, Google Scholar - 25.Ruiseñor Vázquez PR, Galletti JD, Minguez N, Pentacam Scheimpflug tomography findings in topographically normal patients and subclinical keratoconus cases. Am J Ophthalmol. 2014; 158(1):32–40.e2.
10.1016/j.ajo.2014.03.018 Crossref Medline, Google Scholar - 26.Serdarogullari H, Tetikoglu M, Karahan H, Altin F, Elcioglu M. Prevalence of keratoconus and subclinical keratoconus in subjects with astigmatism using Pentacam derived parameters. J Ophthalmic Vis Res. 2013; 8(3):213–219. Medline, Google Scholar
- 27.Ozgurhan EB, Kara N, Yildirim A, Bozkurt E, Uslu H, Demirok A. Evaluation of corneal microstructure in keratoconus: a confocal microscopy study. Am J Ophthalmol. 2013; 156(5):885–893.e2.
10.1016/j.ajo.2013.05.043 Crossref Medline, Google Scholar - 28.de Sanctis U, Aragno V, Dalmasso P, Brusasco L, Grignolo F. Diagnosis of subclinical keratoconus using posterior elevation measured with 2 different methods. Cornea. 2013; 32(7):911–915.
10.1097/ICO.0b013e3182854774 Crossref Medline, Google Scholar - 29.Ramos-López D, Martínez-Finkelshtein A, Castro-Luna GM, Screening subclinical keratoconus with Placido-based corneal indices. Optom Vis Sci. 2013; 90(4):335–343.
10.1097/OPX.0b013e3182843f2a Crossref Medline, Google Scholar - 30.Ahmadi Hosseini SM, Mohidin N, Abolbashari F, Mohd-Ali B, Santhirathelagan CT. Corneal thickness and volume in subclinical and clinical keratoconus. Int Ophthalmol. 2013; 33(2):139–145.
10.1007/s10792-012-9654-x Crossref Medline, Google Scholar - 31.Arbelaez MC, Versaci F, Vestri G, Barboni P, Savini G. Use of a support vector machine for keratoconus and subclinical keratoconus detection by topographic and tomographic data. Ophthalmology. 2012; 119(11):2231–2238.
10.1016/j.ophtha.2012.06.005 Crossref Medline, Google Scholar - 32.Uçakhan ÖÖ, Cetinkor V, Özkan M, Kanpolat A. Evaluation of Scheimpflug imaging parameters in subclinical keratoconus, keratoconus, and normal eyes. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2011; 37(6):1116–1124.
10.1016/j.jcrs.2010.12.049 Crossref Medline, Google Scholar - 33.Miháltz K, Kovács I, Kránitz K, Erdei G, Németh J, Nagy ZZ. Mechanism of aberration balance and the effect on retinal image quality in keratoconus: optical and visual characteristics of keratoconus. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2011; 37(5):914–922.
10.1016/j.jcrs.2010.12.040 Crossref Medline, Google Scholar - 34.Piñero DP, Alió JL, Alesón A, Escaf Vergara M, Miranda M. Corneal volume, pachymetry, and correlation of anterior and posterior corneal shape in subclinical and different stages of clinical keratoconus. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2010; 36(5):814–825.
10.1016/j.jcrs.2009.11.012 Crossref Medline, Google Scholar - 35.Bühren J, Kook D, Yoon G, Kohnen T. Detection of subclinical keratoconus by using corneal anterior and posterior surface aberrations and thickness spatial profiles. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010; 51(7):3424–3432.
10.1167/iovs.09-4960 Crossref Medline, Google Scholar - 36.Lema I, Sobrino T, Durán JA, Brea D, Díez-Feijoo E. Subclinical keratoconus and inflammatory molecules from tears. Br J Ophthalmol. 2009; 93(6):820–824.
10.1136/bjo.2008.144253 Crossref Medline, Google Scholar - 37.de Sanctis U, Loiacono C, Richiardi L, Turco D, Mutani B, Grignolo FM. Sensitivity and specificity of posterior corneal elevation measured by Pentacam in discriminating keratoconus/subclinical keratoconus. Ophthalmology. 2008; 115(9):1534–1539.
10.1016/j.ophtha.2008.02.020 Crossref Medline, Google Scholar - 38.Bühren J, Kühne C, Kohnen T. Defining subclinical keratoconus using corneal first-surface higher-order aberrations. Am J Ophthalmol. 2007; 143(3):381–389.
10.1016/j.ajo.2006.11.062 Crossref Medline, Google Scholar - 39.Awad EA, Abou Samra WA, Torky MA, El-Kannishy AM. Objective and subjective diagnostic parameters in the fellow eye of unilateral keratoconus. BMC Ophthalmol. 2017; 17(1):186.
10.1186/s12886-017-0584-2 Crossref Medline, Google Scholar - 40.Naderan M, Jahanrad A, Farjadnia M. Ocular, corneal, and internal aberrations in eyes with keratoconus, forme fruste keratoconus, and healthy eyes. Int Ophthalmol. 2018; 38(4):1565–1573.
10.1007/s10792-017-0620-5 Crossref Medline, Google Scholar - 41.Pahuja N, Shroff R, Pahanpate P, Application of high resolution OCT to evaluate irregularity of Bowman's layer in asymmetric keratoconus. J Biophotonics. 2017; 10(5):701–707.
10.1002/jbio.201600106 Crossref Medline, Google Scholar - 42.Fujimoto H, Maeda N, Shintani A, Quantitative evaluation of the natural progression of keratoconus using three-dimensional optical coherence tomography. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2016; 57(9):OCT169–OCT175.
10.1167/iovs.15-18650 Crossref Medline, Google Scholar - 43.Hashemi H, Beiranvand A, Khabazkhoob M, Corneal elevation and keratoconus indices in a 40- to 64-year-old population, Shahroud Eye Study. J Curr Ophthalmol. 2016; 27(3–4):92–98.
10.1016/j.joco.2015.10.007 Crossref Medline, Google Scholar - 44.Freitas G de O, Ambrósio R, Ramos I, Astigmatic vector analysis of posterior corneal surface: a comparison among healthy, forme fruste, and overt keratoconic corneas. Am J Ophthalmol. 2016; 167:65–71.
10.1016/j.ajo.2016.04.008 Crossref Medline, Google Scholar - 45.Ruiz Hidalgo I, Rodriguez P, Rozema JJ, Evaluation of a machine-learning classifier for keratoconus detection based on Scheimpflug tomography. Cornea. 2016; 35(6):827–832.
10.1097/ICO.0000000000000834 Crossref Medline, Google Scholar - 46.Luz A, Lopes B, Hallahan KM, Discriminant value of custom Ocular Response Analyzer waveform derivatives in forme fruste keratoconus. Am J Ophthalmol. 2016; 164:14–21.
10.1016/j.ajo.2015.12.020 Crossref Medline, Google Scholar - 47.Zhang L, Danesh J, Tannan A, Phan V, Yu F, Hamilton DR. Second-generation corneal deformation signal waveform analysis in normal, forme fruste keratoconic, and manifest keratoconic corneas after statistical correction for potentially confounding factors. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2015; 41(10):2196–2204.
10.1016/j.jcrs.2015.11.011 Crossref Medline, Google Scholar - 48.Ayar O, Ozmen MC, Muftuoglu O, Akdemir MO, Koc M, Ozulken K. In-vivo corneal biomechanical analysis of unilateral keratoconus. Int J Ophthalmol. 2015; 8(6):1141–1145. Medline, Google Scholar
- 49.Mohammadpour M, Etesami I, Yavari Z, Naderan M, Abdollahinia F, Jabbarvand M. Ocular Response Analyzer parameters in healthy, keratoconus suspect and manifest keratoconus eyes. Oman J Ophthalmol. 2015; 8(2):102–106.
10.4103/0974-620X.159255 Crossref Medline, Google Scholar - 50.Sideroudi H, Labiris G, Giarmoukakis A, Bougatsou N, Kozobolis V. Contribution of reference bodies in diagnosis of keratoconus. Optom Vis Sci. 2014; 91(6):676–681.
10.1097/OPX.0000000000000258 Crossref Medline, Google Scholar - 51.Ye C, Ng PK-F, Jhanji V. Optical quality assessment in normal and forme fruste keratoconus eyes with a double-pass system: a comparison and variability study. Br J Ophthalmol. 2014; 98(11):1478–1483.
10.1136/bjophthalmol-2013-304494 Crossref Medline, Google Scholar - 52.Fukuda S, Beheregaray S, Hoshi S, Comparison of three-dimensional optical coherence tomography and combining a rotating Scheimpflug camera with a Placido topography system for forme fruste keratoconus diagnosis. Br J Ophthalmol. 2013; 97(12):1554–1559.
10.1136/bjophthalmol-2013-303477 Crossref Medline, Google Scholar - 53.Smadja D, Touboul D, Cohen A, Detection of subclinical keratoconus using an automated decision tree classification. Am J Ophthalmol. 2013; 156(2):237–246.e1.
10.1016/j.ajo.2013.03.034 Crossref Medline, Google Scholar - 54.Kozobolis V, Sideroudi H, Giarmoukakis A, Gkika M, Labiris G. Corneal biomechanical properties and anterior segment parameters in forme fruste keratoconus. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2012; 22(6):920–930.
10.5301/ejo.5000184 Crossref Medline, Google Scholar - 55.Saad A, Gatinel D. Evaluation of total and corneal wavefront high order aberrations for the detection of forme fruste keratoconus. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012; 53(6):2978–2992.
10.1167/iovs.11-8803 Crossref Medline, Google Scholar - 56.Johnson RD, Nguyen MT, Lee N, Hamilton DR. Corneal biomechanical properties in normal, forme fruste keratoconus, and manifest keratoconus after statistical correction for potentially confounding factors. Cornea. 2011; 30(5):516–523.
10.1097/ICO.0b013e3181f0579e Crossref Medline, Google Scholar - 57.Saad A, Gatinel D. Topographic and tomographic properties of forme fruste keratoconus corneas. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010; 51(11):5546–5555.
10.1167/iovs.10-5369 Crossref Medline, Google Scholar - 58.Kirwan C, O'Malley D, O'Keefe M. Corneal hysteresis and corneal resistance factor in keratoectasia: findings using the Reichert Ocular Response Analyzer. Ophthalmologica. 2008; 222(5):334–337.
10.1159/000145333 Crossref Medline, Google Scholar - 59.Chan C, Ang M, Saad A, Validation of an objective scoring system for forme fruste keratoconus detection and post-LASIK ectasia risk assessment in Asian eyes. Cornea. 2015; 34(9):996–1004.
10.1097/ICO.0000000000000529 Crossref Medline, Google Scholar - 60.Merriam-Webster's Collegiate Dictionary, 3rd ed. Springfield, MA: Merriam-Webster Incorporated; 2008. Google Scholar
- 61.Randleman JB, Trattler WB, Stulting RD. Validation of the Ectasia Risk Score System for preoperative laser in situ keratomileusis screening. Am J Ophthalmol. 2008; 145(5):813–818.
10.1016/j.ajo.2007.12.033 Crossref Medline, Google Scholar - 62.Amsler M. Le kératocône fruste au Javal. Ophthalmologica. 1938; 96(2):77–83.
10.1159/000299577 Crossref, Google Scholar - 63.Amsler M. Kératocõne classique et kératocône fruste; arguments unitaires. Ophthalmologica. 1946; 111(2–3):96–101.
10.1159/000300309 Crossref Medline, Google Scholar - 64.Silverman RH, Urs R, RoyChoudhury A, Archer TJ, Gobbe M, Reinstein DZ. Combined tomography and epithelial thickness mapping for diagnosis of keratoconus. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2017; 27(2):129–134.
10.5301/ejo.5000850 Crossref Medline, Google Scholar - 65.Luz A, Lopes B, Hallahan KM, Enhanced combined tomography and biomechanics data for distinguishing forme fruste keratoconus. J Refract Surg. 2016; 32(7):479–494.
10.3928/1081597X-20160502-02 Link, Google Scholar - 66.Villavicencio OF, Gilani F, Henriquez MA, Izquierdo L, Ambrosio RA, Belin MW. Independent population validation of the Belin/Ambrósio Enhanced Ectasia Display: implications for keratoconus studies and screening. Int J Keratoconus Ectatic Corneal Diseases. 2014; 3(1):1–8.
10.5005/jp-journals-10025-1069 Crossref, Google Scholar
