Skip to main content
Published Online:https://doi.org/10.3928/1081597X-20210609-03

Abstract

PURPOSE:

To evaluate whether intraoperative aberrometry improves the accuracy of refractive outcomes after cataract surgery in highly myopic, highly hyperopic, and post-refractive eyes.

METHODS:

This single-center, retrospective review compared the spherical equivalent of postoperative refraction to that predicted by the Barrett Universal II formula versus Optiwave Refractive Analysis (ORA) (Alcon Laboratories, Inc) for highly myopic and hyperopic eyes and to the Barrett True K formula versus ORA for post-refractive eyes. The number and magnitude of lens changes were analyzed and used to determine in how many cases refractive surprises were affected by ORA, with additional subanalysis of outcomes based on average keratometry values.

RESULTS:

ORA led to a change in the lens power implanted in 48% (96 of 198) of eyes, and prevented hyperopic surprise in 27% (15 of 55) and excess myopia in 46% (19 of 41). Steeper keratometry values correlated with more frequent changes on ORA-recommended implanted intraocular lens (P = .0031). ORA led to a similar percentage of eyes falling within ±0.50, ±0.75, and ±1.00 diopters compared to the Barrett Universal II and Barrett True K formulas. In post-refractive eyes, ORA led to a similar mean absolute error when compared to the Barrett True K formula (P = .62). For highly myopic eyes with an axial length of greater than 27 mm, ORA demonstrated a trend toward lower mean absolute error when compared to the Barrett Universal II formula (P = .076).

CONCLUSIONS:

ORA demonstrated similar refractive results to the Barrett True K formula in post-refractive eyes and to the Barrett Universal II formula in highly myopic and hyper-opic eyes and may provide additional benefit for eyes with steeper corneas or an axial length of greater than 27 mm.

[J Refract Surg. 2021;37(9):609–615.]

  • 1.Hawker MJ, Madge SN, Baddeley PA, Perry SR. Refractive expectations of patients having cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005; 31(10):1970–1975. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2005.03.06516338569

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 2.Kane JX, Van Heerden A, Atik A, Petsoglou C. Intraocular lens power formula accuracy: comparison of 7 formulas. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2016; 42(10):1490–1500. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2016.07.02127839605

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 3.McCarthy M, Gavanski GM, Paton KE, Holland SP. Intraocular lens power calculations after myopic laser refractive surgery: a comparison of methods in 173 eyes. Ophthalmology. 2011; 118(5):940–944. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2010.08.048

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 4.Canto AP, Chhadva P, Cabot Fet al.. Comparison of IOL power calculation methods and intraoperative wavefront aberrometer in eyes after refractive surgery. J Refract Surg. 2013; 29(7):484–489. doi:10.3928/1081597X-20130617-0723820231

    LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 5.Hoffer KJ. Intraocular lens power calculation after previous laser refractive surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2009; 35(4):759–765. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2009.01.00519304101

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 6.Ianchulev T, Hoffer KJ, Yoo SHet al.. Intraoperative refractive biometry for predicting intraocular lens power calculation after prior myopic refractive surgery. Ophthalmology. 2014; 121(1):56–60. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2013.08.041

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 7.Cionni RJ, Dimalanta R, Breen M, Hamilton C. A large retrospective database analysis comparing outcomes of intraoperative aberrometry with conventional preoperative planning. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2018; 44(10):1230–1235. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2018.07.01630104081

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 8.Hill DC, Sudhakar S, Hill CSet al.. Intraoperative aberrometry versus preoperative biometry for intraocular lens power selection in axial myopia. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2017; 43(4):505–510. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2017.01.01428532936

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 9.Reitblat O, Levy A, Kleinmann G, Lerman TT, Assia EI. Intraocular lens power calculation for eyes with high and low average keratometry readings: comparison between various formulas. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2017; 43(9):1149–1156. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2017.06.03628991610

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

We use cookies on this site to enhance your user experience. For a complete overview of all the cookies used, please see our privacy policy.

×
  • Received1/18/20 12:00 AM
  • Accepted5/12/21 12:00 AM
  • Published online9/1/21 12:00 AM
  • __article__history--ppub9/1/21 12:00 AM