Skip to main content
Ophthalmic Surgery, Lasers and Imaging Retina, 2009;40(2):96–101
Cite this articlePublished Online:https://doi.org/10.3928/15428877-20090301-16Cited by:51

Abstract

Background and Objective:

To compare images of geographic atrophy (GA) obtained using spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) with images obtained using fundus autofluorescence (FAF).

Patients and Methods:

Five eyes from patients with dry AMD were imaged using SD-OCT and FAF, and the size and shape of the GA were compared.

Results:

GA appears bright on SD-OCT compared with the surrounding areas with an intact retinal pigment epithelium because of increased reflectivity from the underlying choroid. SD-OCT and FAF both identified GA reproducibly, and measurement of the area of GA is comparable between the two methods with a mean difference of 2.7% of the total area.

Conclusion:

SD-OCT can identify and quantitate areas of GA. The size and shape of these areas correlate well to the areas of GA seen on autofluorescence images; however, SD-OCT imaging also provides important cross-sectional anatomic information.

[Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging 2009;40:96–101.]

  • 1.Wang JJ, Rochtchina E, Lee AJet al.. Ten-year incidence and progression of age-related maculopathy: the Blue Mountains Eye Study. Ophthalmology. 2007; 114:92–98.

    > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 2.Klein R, Klein BE, Knudtson MDet al.. Fifteen-year cumulative incidence of age-related macular degeneration: the Beaver Dam Eye Study. Ophthalmology. 2007; 114:253–262.

    > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 3.Buch H, Nielsen NV, Vinging Tet al.. 14-year incidence, progression, and visual morbidity of age-related maculopathy: the Copenhagen City Eye Study. Ophthalmology. 2005; 112:787–798.

    > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 4.Sunness JS, Gonzalez-Baron J, Applegate CAet al.. Enlargement of atrophy and visual acuity loss in the geographic atrophy form of age-related macular degeneration. Ophthalmology. 1999; 106:1768–1779.

    > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 5.Age-Related Eye Disease Study Research Group. A randomized, placebo-controlled, clinical trial of high-dose supplementation with vitamins C and E, beta carotene, and zinc for age-related macular degeneration and vision loss: AREDS report no. 8. Arch Ophthalmol. 2001; 119:1417–1436.

    > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 6.Petrukhin K. New therapeutic targets in atrophic age-related macular degeneration. Expert Opin Ther Targets. 2007; 11:625–639.

    > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 7.Gehrs KM, Anderson DH, Johnson LV, Hageman GS. Age-related macular degeneration—emerging pathogenetic and therapeutic concepts. Ann Med. 2006; 38:450–471.

    > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 8.Davis MD, Gangnon RE, Lee LYet al.. The Age-Related Eye Disease Study severity scale for age-related macular degeneration: AREDS Report No. 17. Arch Ophthalmol. 2005; 123:1484–1498.

    > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 9.Sunness JS, Bressler NM, Tian Yet al.. Measuring geographic atrophy in advanced age-related macular degeneration. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1999; 40:1761–1769.

    > MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 10.Pirbhai A, Sheidow T, Hooper P. Prospective evaluation of digital non-stereo color fundus photography as a screening tool in age-related macular degeneration. Am J Ophthalmol. 2005; 139:455–461.

    > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 11.Scholl HP, Peto T, Dandekar Set al.. Inter- and intraobserver variability in grading lesions of age-related maculopathy and macular degeneration. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2003; 241:39–47.

    > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 12.Delori FC, Dorey CK, Staurenghi Get al.. In vivo fluorescence of the ocular fundus exhibits retinal pigment epithelium lipofuscin characteristics. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1995; 36:718–729.

    > MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 13.Spaide RF. Fundus autofluorescence and age-related macular degeneration. Ophthalmology. 2003; 110:392–399.

    > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 14.Wojtkowski M, Bajraszewski T, Gorczynska Iet al.. Ophthalmic imaging by spectral optical coherence tomography. Am J Ophthalmol. 2004; 138:412–419.

    > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 15.Srinivasan VJ, Wojtkowski M, Witkin AJet al.. High-definition and 3-dimensional imaging of macular pathologies with high-speed ultrahigh-resolution optical coherence tomography. Ophthalmology. 2006; 113:2054.e1–14.

    > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 16.Jiao S, Knighton RW, Huang Xet al.. Simultaneous acquisition of sectional and fundus ophthalmic images with spectral-domain optical coherence tomography. Opt Express. 2005; 13:444–452.

    > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 17.Wojtkowski M, Srinivasan VJ, Fujimoto JGet al.. Three-dimensional retinal imaging with high-speed ultrahigh-resolution optical coherence tomography. Ophthalmology. 2005; 112:1734–1746.

    > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 18.Giovannini A, Amato G, Mariotti C, Scassellati-Sforzolini B. Optical coherence tomography in the assessment of retinal pigment epithelial tear. Retina. 2000; 20:37–40.

    > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 19.Hong Y, Makita S, Masahiro Yet al.. Three-dimensional visualization of choroidal vessels by using standard and ultra-high resolution scattering optical coherence angiography. Opt Express. 2007; 15:7538–7550.

    > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 20.Holz FG, Bindewald-Wittich A, Fleckenstein Met al.. Progression of geographic atrophy and impact of fundus autofluorescence patterns in age-related macular degeneration. Am J Ophthalmol. 2007; 143:463–472.

    > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 21.Hopkins J, Walsh A, Chakravarthy U. Fundus autofluorescence in age-related macular degeneration: an epiphenomenon? Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006; 47:2269–2271.

    > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

We use cookies on this site to enhance your user experience. For a complete overview of all the cookies used, please see our privacy policy.

×