Skip to main content
Ophthalmic Surgery, Lasers and Imaging Retina, 2011;42(4):338–345
Published Online:https://doi.org/10.3928/15428877-20110603-01Cited by:32

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE:

To assess the biocompatibility and intraocular pressure (IOP) lowering effect of a novel glaucoma drainage implant in rabbits.

MATERIALS AND METHODS:

Sixteen New Zealand white rabbits received one of three glaucoma drainage implants fabricated from poly-(styrene-b-isobutylene-b-styrene [SIBS]) with an internal diameter of the lumen of either 70 (6 eyes), 100 (6 eyes), or 150 (4 eyes) μm. Clinical follow-up examinations were performed during 6 months and postmortem eyes were studied with light microscopy.

RESULTS:

Smaller internal diameter implants were associated with fewer complications. IOP levels were not statistically different among the groups. No eyes developed serious complications. Mild chronic inflammation was observed around the tube using light microscopy.

CONCLUSION:

SIBS glaucoma drainage implants did not produce clinically detectable intraocular inflammation in a rabbit model. The 70- and 100-μm SIBS drainage devices demonstrated fewer postoperative complications. IOP levels were not statistically different from control eyes in all groups.

  • 1.Stewart WC, Kolker AE, Sharpe ED, et al.Factors associated with long-term progression or stability in primary open-angle glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol. 2000; 130:274–279.10.1016/S0002-9394(00)00487-6

    > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 2.Molteno AC, Van Rooyen MM, Bartholomew RS. Implants for drainage neovascular glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol. 1977; 61:120–125.10.1136/bjo.61.2.120

    > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 3.Da Mata A, Burk SE, Netland PA, Baltatzis S, Christen W, Foster CS. Management of uveitic glaucoma with Ahmed glaucoma valve implantation. Ophthalmology. 1999; 106:2168–2172.10.1016/S0161-6420(99)90500-6

    > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 4.Coleman AL, Smyth RJ, Wilson MR, Tam M. Initial clinical experience with the Ahmed Glaucoma Valve implant in pediatric patients. Arch Ophthalmol. 1997; 115:186–191.

    > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 5.Wilcox M, Kadri OA. Force and geometry determine structure and function of glaucoma filtration capsules. Ophthalmologica. 2007; 221:238–243.10.1159/000101925

    > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 6.Jacob JT, Burgoyne CF, McKinnon SJ, et al.Biocompatibility response to modified Baerveldt glaucoma drains. J Biomed Mater Res. 1998; 43:99–107.10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(199822)43:2<99::AID-JBM3>3.0.CO;2-G

    > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 7.Boswell CA, Noecker RJ, Mac M, Snyder RW, Williams SK. Evaluation of an aqueous drainage glaucoma device constructed of ePTFE. J Biomed Mater Res. 1999; 48:591–595.10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(1999)48:5<591::AID-JBM1>3.0.CO;2-9

    > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 8.Lim KS, Allan BD, Lloyd AW, et al.Glaucoma drainage devices: past, present, and future. Br J Ophthalmol. 1998; 82:1083–1089.10.1136/bjo.82.9.1083

    > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 9.Acosta AC, Espana EM, Yamamoto H, et al.A newly designed glaucoma drainage implant made of poly(styrene-b-isobutylene-b-styrene): biocompatibility and function in normal rabbit eyes. Arch Ophthalmol. 2006; 124:1742–1749.10.1001/archopht.124.12.1742

    > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 10.Ranade SV, Richard R, Helmus M. Styrenic block copolymers for biomaterial and drug delivery applications. Acta Biomaterialia. 2005; 1:137–144.10.1016/j.actbio.2004.09.004

    > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 11.Stone GW, Ellis SG, Cox DA, et al.A polymer-based, paclitaxel-eluting stent inpatients with coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med. 2004; 350:221–231.10.1056/NEJMoa032441

    > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 12.Williams AS. Setons in glaucoma surgery. In: , Albert D, Jakobiec F, ed. Principles and Practice of Ophthalmology: Clinical Practice, 1st ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 1994:1655–1667.

    > Google Scholar
  • 13.Rosenberg LF, Kuprin T. Implants in glaucoma surgery. In: , Ritch R, Shields MB, Kuprin T, eds. The Glaucomas. Philadelphia: Mosby; 1996:1783–1807.

    > Google Scholar
  • 14.Ayyala RS, Zurakowski D, Smith JA, et al.A clinical study of the Ahmed glaucoma valve implant in advanced glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 1998; 105:1968–1976.10.1016/S0161-6420(98)91049-1

    > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 15.Coleman AL, Hill R, Wilson MR, et al.Initial clinical experience with the Ahmed Glaucoma Valve Implant. Am J Ophthalmol. 1995; 120:23–31.

    > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 16.Geankoplis CJ. Transport Processes and Unit Operations, 3rd ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall; 1995:80–85.

    > Google Scholar
  • 17.Brubaker RF. Flow of aqueous humor in humans [The Friedenwald Lecture]. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1991; 32:3145–3166.

    > MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 18.Lee VH, Robinson JR. Topical ocular drug delivery: recent developments and future challenges. J Ocul Pharmacol. 1986; 2:67–108.10.1089/jop.1986.2.67

    > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 19.Pellinen P, Lokkila J. Corneal penetration into rabbit aqueous humor is comparable between preserved and preservative-free tafluprost. Ophthalmic Res. 2009; 41:118–122.10.1159/000192082

    > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 20.Lim KS, Wickremasinghe SS, Cordeiro MF, Bunce C, Khaw PT. Accuracy of intraocular pressure measurements in New Zealand white rabbits. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005; 46:2419–2423.10.1167/iovs.04-0610

    > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 21.Katz RS, Henkind P, Weitzman ED. The circadian rhythm of the intraocular pressure in the New Zealand white rabbit. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1975; 14:775–780.

    > Google Scholar
  • 22.Kondo H, Fantes F, Kato H, Gautier S, Parel JM. Synthetic meshwork implant for glaucoma filtering surgery: effect of adjunct heparin and sodium hyaluronate in rabbits. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers. 1998; 29:669–676.

    > LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 23.Jallet V, Gautier SE, Parel JM, et al.Novel synthetic meshwork for glaucoma treatment. I: design and preliminary in vitro and in vivo evaluation of various expanded poly(tetrafluoroethylene) materials. J Biomed Mat Res. 1999; 47:260–269.10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(199911)47:2<260::AID-JBM17>3.0.CO;2-J

    > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 24.Prata JA, Santos RC, Labree L, Minckler DS. Surface area of glaucoma implants and perfusion flow rates in rabbit eyes. J Glaucoma. 1995; 4:274–280.10.1097/00061198-199508000-00010

    > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 25.Sherwood MB. A sequential, multiple-treatment, targeted approach to reduce wound healing and failure of glaucoma filtration surgery in a rabbit model. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 2006; 104:478–492.

    > MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 26.Minckler DS, Shammas A, Wilcox M, Ogden TE. Experimental studies of aqueous filtration using the Molteno implant. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 1987; 85:368–392.

    > MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 27.Lloyd MA, Baerveldt G, Nguyen QH, Minckler DS. Long term histologic studies of the Baerveldt implant in rabbit model. J Glaucoma. 1996; 5:334–339.10.1097/00061198-199610000-00008

    > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

We use cookies on this site to enhance your user experience. For a complete overview of all the cookies used, please see our privacy policy.

×