Skip to main content
Ophthalmic Surgery, Lasers and Imaging Retina, 2012;43(3):184–189
Published Online:https://doi.org/10.3928/15428877-20120102-05Cited by:47

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE:

To evaluate the correlation between macular hole (MH) surgery outcomes and preoperative factors believed to affect surgical success rates.

PATIENTS AND METHODS:

A retrospective, consecutive case series was designed to evaluate the correlation between anatomic success and preoperative factors: MH duration prior to surgery, visual acuity (VA), and MH diameter measured by optical coherence tomography (OCT) at the base and the narrowest midpoint.

RESULTS:

A total of 153 eyes were enrolled. There was no significant difference in mean duration prior to surgery for MH success and failure (P = .13). Mean preoperative VA was significantly better for MH success than failure (P = .03). Mean mid-hole diameter (P < .001) and mean base-hole diameter (P < .001) were significantly less for MH success than failure. Failure rate was 0% among eyes with mid-hole diameter less than 500 microns and 14.9% with mid-hole 500 microns or greater (P < .001). Failure rate was 0% among eyes with base-hole diameter less than 500 microns, 1.4% with base-hole 500 to 999 microns, and 19.1% with base-hole of 1,000 microns or greater (P = .001).

CONCLUSION:

Preoperative VA, mid-hole diameter, and base-hole diameter are correlated with anatomic success in MH surgery. An excellent surgical prognosis exists for MHs with mid-hole diameter less than 500 microns and base-hole less than 1,000 microns.

  • 1.Kelly NE, Wendel RT. Vitreous surgery for idiopathic macular holes: results of a pilot study. Arch Ophthalmol. 1991; 109:654–659.10.1001/archopht.1991.01080050068031

    > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 2.Judson PH, Yannuzzi LA. Macular hole. In: , Ryan SJ, ed. Retina, vol. 2. St. Louis: Mosby; 1994:1169–1185.

    > Google Scholar
  • 3.Gass JDM. Stereoscopic Atlas of Macular Diseases: Diagnosis and Treatment, vol. 2, 4th ed. St. Louis, MO: Mosby; 1997.

    > Google Scholar
  • 4.Ip MS, Baker BJ, Duker JS, et al.Anatomical outcomes of surgery for idiopathic macular hole as determined by optical coherence tomography. Arch Ophthalmol. 2002; 120:29–35.

    > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 5.Freeman WR, Azen SP, Kim JW, El-Haig W, Mishell DR, Bailey I. Vitrectomy for the treatment of full-thickness stage 3 or 4 macular holes: results of a multicentered randomized clinical trial. Arch Ophthalmol. 1997; 115:11–21.10.1001/archopht.1997.01100150013002

    > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 6.Altaweel M, Ip M. Macular hole: improved understanding of pathogenesis, staging, and management based on optical coherence tomography. Semin Ophthalmol. 2003; 18:58–66.10.1076/soph.18.2.58.15858

    > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 7.Ulrich S, Haritoglou C, Gass C, Schaumberger M, Ulbig MW, Kampik A. Macular hole size as a prognostic factor in macular hole surgery. Br J Ophthalmol. 2002; 86:390–393.10.1136/bjo.86.4.390

    > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 8.Ruiz-Moreno JM, Staicu C, Piñero DP, Montero J, Lugo F, Amat P. Optical coherence tomography predictive factors for macular hole surgery outcome. Br J Ophthalmol. 2008; 92:640–644.10.1136/bjo.2007.136176

    > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 9.Ryan EH, Gilbert HD. Results of surgical treatment of recent-onset full-thickness idiopathic macular holes. Arch Ophthalmol. 1994; 112:1545–1553.10.1001/archopht.1994.01090240051025

    > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 10.Hoerauf H. Predictive values in macular hole repair: optical coherence tomography improves the management of persistent macular holes. Br J Ophthalmol. 2007; 91:1415–1416.10.1136/bjo.2007.119594

    > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 11.Schumann RG, Rohleder M, Schaumberger MM, Haritoglou C, Kampik A, Gandorfer A. Idiopathic macular holes: ultrastructural aspects of surgical failure. Retina. 2008; 28:340–349.10.1097/IAE.0b013e31814cef23

    > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 12.Tadayoni R, Gaudric A, Haouchine B, Massin P. Relationship between macular hole size and the potential benefit of internal limiting membrane peeling. Br J Ophthalmol. 2006; 90:1239–1241.10.1136/bjo.2006.091777

    > Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 13.Desai VN, Hee MR, Puliafito CA. Optical coherence tomography of macular holes. In: , Madreperla SA, McCuen BW, eds. Macular Hole: Pathogenesis, Diagnosis and Treatment. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann; 1999:37–47.

    > Google Scholar

We use cookies on this site to enhance your user experience. For a complete overview of all the cookies used, please see our privacy policy.

×