Skip to main content
Published Online:https://doi.org/10.3928/15428877-20120830-01Cited by:9

Abstract

A modified Gundersen conjunctival flap combined with amniotic membrane to treat symptomatic bullous keratopathy and poor visual prognosis is described. A 360° conjunctival peritomy was performed 2 mm from the limbus. After complete epithelial removal of the corneo-conjunctival surface, an amniotic membrane graft was sutured at the peripheral cornea with a running 10-0 nylon suture. Single 9-0 polyglactin sutures attached the edges of the amniotic membrane with the peritomized conjunctiva, which lay over the amniotic membrane. Five eyes were treated. Epithelialization, resolution of the pain, presence of ocular surface inflammation, and reinterventions were assessed. All eyes showed immediate resolution of the pain and minimal inflammation. In 1 eye, the amniotic membrane was reabsorbed before complete epithelialization. No reinterventions were required. All eyes were asymptomatic for at least 16 months. This technique provided sustained relief of symptomatic bullous keratopathy while significantly reducing the conjunctival manipulation and the anatomical distortion associated with classic sliding conjunctival flaps.

  • 1.Ghosheh FR, Cremona FA, Rapuano CJ, et al.Trends in penetrating keratoplasty in the United States, 1980–2005. Int Ophthalmol. 2008; 28:147–153.10.1007/s10792-007-9177-z

    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 2.Kang PC, Klintworth GK, Kim T, et al.Trends in the indications for penetrating keratoplasty, 1980–2001. Cornea. 2005; 24:801–803.10.1097/01.ico.0000157407.43699.22

    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 3.Tan DT, Janardhanan P, Zhou H, et al.Penetrating keratoplasty in Asian eyes: the Singapore Corneal Transplant Study. Ophthalmology. 2008; 115:975–982.10.1016/j.ophtha.2007.08.049

    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 4.Panda A, Vanathi M, Kumar A, et al.Corneal graft rejection. Surv Ophthalmol. 2007; 52:375–396.10.1016/j.survophthal.2007.04.008

    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 5.Maguire M, Stark WJ, Gottsch JD, et al.Risk factors for corneal graft failure and rejections in the collaborative corneal transplantation studies. Collaborative Corneal Transplantation Studies Research Group. Ophthalmology. 1994; 101:1536–1547.

    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 6.Foulks GN. Treatment of recurrent corneal erosion and corneal edema with topical osmotic colloidal solution. Ophthalmology. 1981; 88:801–803.

    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 7.Smiddy WE, Hamburg TR, Kracher GP, et al.Therapeutic contact lenses. Ophthalmology. 1990; 97:295–297.

    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 8.Gundersen T. Conjunctival flaps in the treatment of corneal disease with reference to a new technique of application. Arch Ophthalmol. 1958; 60:880–888.10.1001/archopht.1958.00940080900008

    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 9.Gundersen T. Surgical treatment of bullous keratopathy. Arch Ophthalmol. 1960; 64:260–267.10.1001/archopht.1960.01840010262013

    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 10.Sugar HS. The use of Gundersen flaps in the treatment of bullous keratopathy. Am J Ophthalmol. 1964; 57:977–983.

    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 11.Lauring L, Wergeland FL. Total conjunctival flap with a modification of the Gundersen operation. Am J Ophthalmol. 1973; 76:953–956.

    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 12.Lin LS, How AC, Ang LP, Tan DT. Gundersen flaps in the management of ocular surface disease in an Asian population. Cornea. 2009; 28:747–751.10.1097/ICO.0b013e3181963cbe

    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 13.Saw VPJ, Minassian D, Dart JKG, et al.Amniotic membrane transplantation for ocular disease: a review of the first 233 cases from the UK user group. Br J Ophthalmol. 2007; 91:1042–1047.10.1136/bjo.2006.098525

    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 14.Altiparmak UE, Oflu Y, Yildiz EH, et al.Prospective comparison of two suturing techniques of amniotic membrane transplantation for symptomatic bullous keratopathy. Am J Ophthalmol. 2009; 147:442–446.10.1016/j.ajo.2008.08.036

    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 15.Espana EM, Grueterich M, Sandoval H, et al.Amniotic membrane transplantation for bullous keratopathy in eyes with poor visual potential. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2003; 29:279–284.10.1016/S0886-3350(02)01525-0

    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 16.Pires RTF, Tseng SCG, Prabhasawat P, et al.Amniotic membrane transplantation for symptomatic bullous keratopathy. Arch Ophthalmol. 1999; 117:1291–1297.

    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 17.Gomes JAP, Haraguchi DKM, Zambrano DU, et al.Anterior stromal puncture in the treatment of bullous keratopathy: 6 months follow-up. Cornea. 2001; 20:570–572.10.1097/00003226-200108000-00003

    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 18.Cormier G, Brunette I, Boisjoly HM, et al.Anterior stromal puncture for bullous keratopathy. Arch Ophthalmol. 1996; 114:654–658.10.1001/archopht.1996.01100130646002

    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 19.Thomann U, Meiers-Gibbons F, Schipper I. Phototherapeutic keratectomy for bullous keratopathy. Br J Ophthalmol. 1995; 79:335–338.10.1136/bjo.79.4.335

    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 20.Lin PY, Wu CC, Lee SM. Combined phototherapeutic keratectomy and therapeutic contact lens for recurrent erosions in bullous keratopathy. Br J Ophthalmol. 2001; 85:908–911.10.1136/bjo.85.8.908

    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 21.Sonmez B, Kim BT, Aldave AJ. Amniotic membrane transplantation with anterior stromal micropuncture for treatment of painful bullous keratopathy in eyes with poor visual potential. Cornea. 2007; 26:227–229.10.1097/01.ico.0000244876.92879.c1

    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 22.Vyas S, Rathi V. Combined phototherapeutic Keratectomy and amniotic membrane grafts for symptomatic bullous keratopathy. Cornea. 2009; 28:1028–1031.10.1097/ICO.0b013e31819711f6

    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 23.Dua HS, Gomes JAP, King AJ, et al.The amniotic membrane in ophthalmology. Surv Ophthalmol. 2004; 49:51–77.10.1016/j.survophthal.2003.10.004

    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 24.Gris O, Güell JL. Amniotic membrane transplantation. In: , Agarwal A. Dry Eye: A Practical Guide to Ocular Surface Disorders and Stem Cell Surgery. Thorofare, NJ: SLACK Incorporated; 2006: 205–218.

    Google Scholar
  • 25.Gris O, Wolley-Dod C, Güell JL, et al.Histologic findings after amniotic membrane graft in the human cornea. Ophthalmology. 2002; 109:508–512.10.1016/S0161-6420(01)00969-1

    CrossrefGoogle Scholar

We use cookies on this site to enhance your user experience. For a complete overview of all the cookies used, please see our privacy policy.

×