Skip to main content
Published Online:https://doi.org/10.3928/15428877-20120906-03Cited by:1

Abstract

Retained Descemet’s membrane (DM) following penetrating keratoplasty (PKP) is a rare finding that may reduce visual acuity following opacification or endanger the graft endothelium. The association between Nd:YAG laser membranotomy and corneal graft failure is reported. Five of 1,350 patients (0.37%) undergoing PKP for pseudophakic bullous keratopathy or graft failure between 1986 and 2008 presented with inadvertent retained DM located close to the graft endothelium. The membrane opacified within 3 to 4 months, reducing the patients’ vision. Nd:YAG laser membranotomy was performed using low energy and few pulses. Patients’ visual acuity improved from 6/40 to 6/90 before treatment to 6/15(−) to 6/20 at 2 weeks following membranotomy. However, the corneal graft decompensated within 6 to 8 weeks following this procedure, necessitating repeat PKP, with removal of the retained DM. Nd:YAG laser membranotomy may lead to corneal graft failure due to shockwave damage created by the laser pulses, focused near the endothelial surface.

  • 1.Lifshitz T, Oshri T, Resenthal G. Retrocorneal membrane after penetrating keratoplasty. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers. 2001; 32:159–161.

    LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 2.Sherrard ES, Ryoroft PV. Retrocorneal membranes: their origin and structure. Br J Ophthalmol. 1967; 51:379–386.10.1136/bjo.51.6.379

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 3.Brown SI, Dohlman CH, Boruchoff SA. Dislocation of Descemet’s membrane during keratoplasty. Am J Ophthalmol. 1965; 60:43–45.

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 4.Hagedoorm A. Corneal transplantation in advanced Fuch’s dystrophy: the fate of homotransplanted human endothelial cells. Am J Ophthalmol. 1967; 64:433–436.

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 5.Lazar M, Loewenstein A, Geyer O. Intentional retention of Descemet’s membrane during keratoplasty. Acta Ophthalmologica (Copenh). 1991; 69:111–112.10.1111/j.1755-3768.1991.tb02005.x

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 6.Loewenstein A, Geyer O, Lazar M. Intentional retention of Descemet’s membrane in keratoplasty for the surgical treatment of bullous keratopathy. Acta Ophthalmologica (Copenh). 1993; 71:280–282.10.1111/j.1755-3768.1993.tb05005.x

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 7.Archila AE, Ramirez Cabrera MF, Mieth Alviar A. Double Descemet’s membrane in penetrating keratoplasty. Refract Corneal Surg. 1993; 9:65–66.

    LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 8.Chen YP, Lai PC, Chen PY, Lin KK, Hsiao CH. Retained Descemet’s membrane after penetrating keratoplasty. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2003; 29:1842–1844.10.1016/S0886-3350(03)00235-9

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 9.Steinemann TL, Henry K, Brown MF. Nd:YAG laser treatment of retained Descemet’s membrane after penetrating keratoplasty. Ophthalmic Surg. 1995; 26:80–81.

    LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 10.Masket S, Tennen DG. Neodymium:YAG laser optical opening for retained Descemet’s membrane after penetrating keratoplasty. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1996; 22:139–141.

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 11.Sinha R, Vajpayee RB, Sharma N, Titiyal JS, Tandom R. Trypan blue assisted descemetorhexis for inadvertently retained Descemet’s membrane after penetrating keratoplasty. Br J Ophthalmol. 2003; 87:654–655.10.1136/bjo.87.5.654

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 12.Ide T, Yoo SH, Kymionis GD, Shah PA, O’Brien TP. Double Descemet’s membrane after penetrating keratoplasty with anterior segment optical coherence tomography. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging. 2008; 39:422–425.10.3928/15428877-20080901-09

    LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 13.Thyagaraijan S, Mearza AA, Falcon MG. Inadvertent retention of Descemet membrane in penetrating keratoplasty. Cornea. 2006; 25:748–749.10.1097/01.ico.0000208823.78355.57

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 14.Henderson JW, Wolter RJ. Sepepration of Descemet’s membrane in keratoplasty. Am J Ophthalmol. 1968; 65:375–378.

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 15.Waring GO, Bourne WM, Edelhanser HF, Kenyon KR. The corneal endothelium: normal and pathologic structure and function. Ophthalmology. 1982; 89:531–590.

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 16.Power WJ, Collum LM. Electron microscopic appearances of human corneal endothelium following Nd:YAG laser iridotomy. Ophthalmic Surg. 1992; 23:347–350.

    LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 17.Wu SC, Jeng S, Huang SC, Lin SM. Corneal endothelial damage after neodymium: YAG laser iridotomy. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers. 2000; 31:411–416.

    LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 18.Kozobolis VP, Detorakis ET, Vlachonikolis IG, Pallikaris IG. Endothelial corneal damage after neodymium:YAG laser treatment: pupillary membranectomies, iridotomies, capsulotomies. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers. 1998; 29:793–802.

    LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 19.Landers J, Craig J. Decompression retinopathy and corneal edema following Nd:YAG laser peripheral iridotomy. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol. 2006; 34:182–184.10.1111/j.1442-9071.2006.01180.x

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 20.Vaikoussis E, Bisogiannis Z, Margaritis L. Corneal endothelial damage after Nd:YAG laser anterior capsulotomy: an experimental study on rabbits. Doc Ophthalmol. 1993; 83:279–286.10.1007/BF01204329

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 21.Meyer KT, Pettit TH, Straatsma BR. Corneal endothelial damage with Neodymium:YAG laser. Ophthalmology. 1984; 91:1022–1028.

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 22.Ker Muir MG, Sherrard ES. Damage to the corneal endothelium during Nd:YAG photodisruption. Br J Ophthalmol. 1985; 69:77–85.10.1136/bjo.69.2.77

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

We use cookies on this site to enhance your user experience. For a complete overview of all the cookies used, please see our privacy policy.

×