Abstract
The current study explored the perceptions of direct care staff working in Australian residential aged care facilities (RACFs) regarding the organizational barriers that they believe prevent them from facilitating decision making for individuals with dementia. Normalization process theory (NPT) was used to interpret the findings to understand these barriers in a broader context. The qualitative study involved semi-structured interviews (N = 41) and focus groups (N = 8) with 80 direct care staff members of all levels working in Australian RACFs. Data collection and analysis were conducted in parallel and followed a systematic, inductive approach in line with grounded theory. The perceptions of participants regarding the organizational barriers to facilitating decision making for individuals with dementia can be described by the core category, Working Within the System, and three sub-themes: (a) finding time, (b) competing rights, and (c) not knowing. Examining the views of direct care staff through the lens of NPT allows possible areas for improvement to be identified at an organizational level and the perceived barriers to be understood in the context of promoting normalization of decision making for individuals with dementia.
[Res Gerontol Nurs. 2015; 8(6):286–292.]
- Agich G.J. (1990). Reassessing autonomy in long-term care. The Hastings Centre Report, 20(6), 12–17.
10.2307/3563417 > CrossrefGoogle Scholar - Australian Government Department of Health. (2013). Charter of residents' rights and responsibilities. Retrieved from https://www.dss.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/09_2014/charter_of_care_recipients_rights_responsibilities_-_residential_care_0.docx > Google Scholar
- Bates-Jensen B.M., Schnelle J.F., Alessi C.A., Al-Samarrai N.R., Levy-Storms L. (2004). The effects of staffing on in-bed times of nursing home residents. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 52, 931–938.
10.1111/j.1532-5415.2004.52260.x > CrossrefGoogle Scholar - Beauchamp T.L., Childress J.F. (1994). Principles of biomedical ethics. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. > Google Scholar
- Bowers B.J., Esmond S., Jacobson N. (2000). The relationship between staffing and quality in long-term care facilities: Exploring the views of nurse aides. Journal of Nursing Care Quality, 14, 55–64.
10.1097/00001786-200007000-00009 > CrossrefGoogle Scholar - Boyle G. (2005). The role of autonomy in explaining mental ill-health and depression among older people in long-term care settings. Ageing & Society, 25, 731–748.
10.1017/S0144686X05003703 > CrossrefGoogle Scholar - Davies S., Slack R., Laker S., Philp I. (1999). The educational preparation of staff in nursing homes: Relationship with resident autonomy. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 29, 208–217.
10.1046/j.1365-2648.1999.00879.x > CrossrefGoogle Scholar - Fetherstonhaugh D., Tarzia L., Bauer M., Nay R., Beattie E. (2014). ‘The red dress or the blue?’: How do staff perceive that they support decision making for people with dementia in residential aged care facilities?Journal of Applied Gerontology. Advanced online publication.
10.1177/0733464814531089 > CrossrefGoogle Scholar - Kontos P.C., Miller K.L., Mitchell G.J., Cott C.A. (2010). Dementia care at the intersection of regulation and reflexivity: A critical realist perspective. Journals of Gerontology. Series B, Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 66, 119–128.
10.1093/geronb/gbq022 > CrossrefGoogle Scholar - Mattiasson A.C., Andersson L. (1995). Nursing home staff attitudes to ethical conflicts with respect to patient autonomy and paternalism. Nursing Ethics, 2, 115–130.
10.1177/096973309500200204 > CrossrefGoogle Scholar - May C., Murray E, Finch T., Mair F., Treweek S., Ballini L., Rapley T. (2010). Normalization process theory online users' manual and toolkit. Retrieved from http://www.normalizationprocess.org > Google Scholar
- May C.R., Mair F., Finch T., MacFarlane A., Dowrick C., Treweek S., Montori V.M. (2009). Development of a theory of implementation and integration: Normalization process theory. Implementation Science, 4, 29.
10.1186/1748-5908-4-29 > CrossrefGoogle Scholar - Mullins L.C., Moody L., Colquitt R.L., Mattiasson A.-C., Andersson L. (1998). An examination of nursing home personnel's perceptions of residents' autonomy. Journal of Applied Gerontology, 17, 442–461.
10.1177/073346489801700403 > CrossrefGoogle Scholar - Nay R., Fetherstonhaugh D., Winbolt M. (2014). Person-centred care. In (Eds.), Older people: Issues and innovations in care. Chatswood NSW, Australia: Churchill Livingstone (Elsevier). > Google Scholar
- Persson T., Wasterfors D. (2009). “Such trivial matters”: How staff account for restrictions of residents' influence in nursing homes. Journal of Aging Studies, 23, 1–11.
10.1016/j.jaging.2007.09.005 > CrossrefGoogle Scholar - Rodgers V., Welford C., Murphy K., Frauenlob T. (2012). Enhancing autonomy for older people in residential care: What factors affect it?International Journal of Older People Nursing, 7, 70–74.
10.1111/j.1748-3743.2012.00310.x > CrossrefGoogle Scholar - Sikorska-Simmons E., Wright J.D. (2007). Determinants of resident autonomy in assisted living facilities: A review of the literature. Case Management Journals, 8, 187–193.
10.1891/152109807782590646 > CrossrefGoogle Scholar - Strauss A., Corbin J. (1994). Grounded theory methodology: An overview. In (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 273–285). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. > Google Scholar
- Tuckett A. (2007). The meaning of nursing-home: ‘Waiting to go up to St. Peter, OK! Waiting house, sad by true’—An Australian perspective. Journal of Aging Studies, 21, 119–133.
10.1016/j.jaging.2006.08.001 > CrossrefGoogle Scholar - Wade R. (1983). Different models of care for the elderly. Nursing Times Occasional Paper, 79, 33–36. > Google Scholar
- Welford C., Murphy K., Rodgers V., Frauenlob T. (2011). Autonomy for older people in residential care: A selective literature review. International Journal of Older People Nursing, 7, 65–69.
10.1111/j.1748-3743.2012.00311.x > CrossrefGoogle Scholar
