Skip to main content
Ophthalmic Surgery, Lasers and Imaging Retina, 2015;46(3):338–343
Published Online:https://doi.org/10.3928/23258160-20150323-07Cited by:3

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE:

To evaluate clinical feasibility, safety, and efficacy of epiretinal strontium-90 brachytherapy in subfoveal choroidal neovascularization (CNV) due to age-related macular degeneration (AMD) in eyes unresponsive to repeated anti-VEGF injections.

PATIENTS AND METHODS:

A retrospective, single-center study on patients treated with strontium-90 brachytherapy for CNV secondary to neovascular AMD. Patients underwent pars plana vitrectomy with a single 24 Gy dose brachytherapy. They were re-treated with anti-VEGF injections on an as-needed basis if subretinal or intraretinal fluid was detected on optical coherence tomography imaging.

RESULTS:

Twenty-two patients were treated, and 20 completed 12 months of follow-up. Ten patients maintained stable vision, eight gained vision, and two lost more than three Snellen lines. The mean best corrected visual acuity change from baseline was −8 ± 5.7 letters. A mean of 5.5 ± 4.4 anti-VEGF injections were administered throughout 12 months.

CONCLUSION:

Epimacular brachytherapy is feasible in clinical practice. While some patients benefit from the treatment and need significantly fewer as-needed injections, others appear not to react to irradiation treatment after 1 year of follow-up. Larger numbers of patients are needed to evaluate therapeutic efficacy and to determine which patients can benefit from combined radiation and anti-VEGF therapy.

[Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina. 2015;46:338–343.]

  • 1.Friedman DS, O’Colmain BJ, Munoz B, et al.Prevalence of age-related macular degeneration in the United States. Arch Ophthalmol. 2004; 122(4):564–572.10.1001/archopht.122.4.564

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 2.Owen CG, Jarrar Z, Wormald R, et al.The estimated prevalence and incidence of late stage age related macular degeneration in the UK. Br J Ophthalmol. 2012; 96(5):752–756.10.1136/bjophthalmol-2011-301109

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 3.Menghini M, Kurz-Levin MM, Amstutz C, et al.Response to ranibizumab therapy in neovascular AMD – an evaluation of good and bad responders. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 2010; 227(4):244–248.10.1055/s-0029-1245203

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 4.Barak A, Hauser D, Yipp P, et al.A phase I trial of stereotactic external beam radiation for subfoveal choroidal neovascular membranes in age-related macular degeneration. Br J Radiol. 2005; 78:827–831.10.1259/bjr/17631422

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 5.Marcus DM, Sheils W, Johnson MH, et al.External beam irradiation of subfoveal choroidal neovascularization complicating age-related macular degeneration: one-year results of a prospective, double-masked, randomized clinical trial. Arch Ophthalmol. 2001; 119:171–180.

    MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 6.Flaxel CJ, Friedrichsen EJ, Smith JO, et al.Proton beam irradiation of subfoveal choroidal neovascularisation in age-related macular degeneration. Eye (Lond). 2000; 14:155–164.10.1038/eye.2000.46

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 7.Char DH, Irvine AI, Posner MD, Quivey J, Phillips TL, Kroll S. Randomized trial of radiation for age-related macular degeneration. Am J Ophthalmol. 1999; 127:574–578.10.1016/S0002-9394(99)00038-0

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 8.Bergink GJ, Hoyng CB, van der Maazen RW, et al.A randomized controlled clinical trial on the efficacy of radiation therapy in the control of subfoveal choroidal neovascularization in age-related macular degeneration: radiation versus observation. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1998; 236:321–325.10.1007/s004170050085

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 9.Evans JR, Sivagnanavel V, Chong V. Radiotherapy for neovascular age-related macular degeneration. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010;(5):CD004004.

    MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 10.Avila MP, Farah ME, Santos A, et al.Twelve-month safety and visual acuity results from a feasibility study of intraocular, epiretinal radiation therapy for the treatment of subfoveal CNV secondary to AMD. Retina. 2009; 29(2):157–169.10.1097/IAE.0b013e3181985915

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 11.Avila MP, Farah ME, Santos A, et al.Twelve-month short-term safety and visual-acuity results from a multicentre prospective study of epiretinalstrontium-90 brachytherapy with bevacizumab for the treatment of subfoveal choroidal neovascularisation-secondary to age-related macular degeneration. Br J Ophthalmol. 2009; 93(3):305–309.10.1136/bjo.2008.145912

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 12.Dugel PU, Bebchuk JD, Nau J, et al.Epimacular Brachytherapy for Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration: A Randomized, Controlled Trial (CABERNET). Ophthalmology. 2013; 120(2):317–327.10.1016/j.ophtha.2012.07.068

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 13.Dugel PU, Petrarca R, Bennett M, et al.Macular epiretinal brachytherapy in treated age-related macular degeneration: MERITAGE study: twelve-month safety and efficacy results. Ophthalmology. 2012; 119(7):1425–1431.10.1016/j.ophtha.2012.01.014

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 14.Jackson TL, Chakravarthy U, Kaiser PK, et al.Stereotactic radiotherapy for neovascular age-related macular degeneration: 52-week safety and efficacy results of the INTREPID study. Ophthalmology. 120(9):1893–1900.

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 15.Holladay JT. Proper method for calculating average visual acuity. J Refract Surg. 1997; 13:388–391.

    LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 16.Schulze-Bonsel K, Feltgen N, Burau H, et al.Visual acuities “hand motion” and “counting fingers” can be quantified with the Freiburger visual acuity test. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006; 47:1236–1240.10.1167/iovs.05-0981

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 17.CATT Research Group. Ranibizumab and bevacizumab for neovascular age-related macular degeneration. N Engl J Med. 2011; 364:1897–1908.10.1056/NEJMoa1102673

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 18.Abedi F, Wickremasinghe S, Richardson AJ, et al.Variants in the VEGFA gene and Treatment Outcome after anti-VEGF Treatment for Neovascular Age-related Macular degeneration. Ophthalmology. 2013; 120(1):115–121.10.1016/j.ophtha.2012.10.006

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 19.Forooghian F, Cukras C, Meyerle CB, et al.Tachyphylaxis after intravitreal bevacizumab for exudative age-related macular degeneration. Retina. 2009; 29(6):723–731.10.1097/IAE.0b013e3181a2c1c3

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 20.Roller AB, Mahajan VB, Boldt HC, et al.Effects of vitrectomy on age-related macular degeneration. Ophthalmology. 2010; 117(7):1381–1386.10.1016/j.ophtha.2009.11.007

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 21.Krebs I, Brannath W, Glittenberg C, et al.Posterior vitreomacular adhesion: a potential risk factor for exudative age-related macular degeneration?Am J Ophthalmol. 2007 144(5):741–746.10.1016/j.ajo.2007.07.024

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 22.Schramm K, Mueller M, Koch FH, et al.Effects of core vitrectomy in the treatment of age-related macular degeneration. Acta Ophthalmol. 2014; 92(5):465–472.10.1111/aos.12326

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 23.Gündüz K, Shields CL, Shields JA, et al.Radiation retinopathy following plaque radiotherapy for posterior uveal melanoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 1999; 117(5):609–614.10.1001/archopht.117.5.609

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

We use cookies on this site to enhance your user experience. For a complete overview of all the cookies used, please see our privacy policy.

×