Skip to main content
Published Online:https://doi.org/10.3928/23258160-20190401-15Cited by:4

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE:

Optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) comparison between vessel density in patients with degenerative-subtype lamellar macular hole (LMH) and healthy individuals. Unaffected fellow eyes were also included in the study.

PATIENTS AND METHODS:

This observational, cross-sectional study examined 32 eyes affected by unilateral degenerative-subtype LMH, as well as the 32 fellow eyes of the enrolled population. Thirty healthy eyes were used as controls. ImageJ software was used to calculate macular vessel density in the three vascular plexuses (superficial capillary plexus [SCP], deep capillary plexus [DCP], choriocapillaris [CC]) in two regions: (1) a fovea-centered 1.5-mm diameter circular area after subtracting the foveal avascular zone (FAZ) area, obtaining a “ring” in the immediate FAZ proximity (peri-FAZ); (2) the area external to (1) included in the scan.

RESULTS:

In the peri-FAZ, the SCP of both LMH and fellow eyes showed higher vascular density than in controls (P = .004 for LMH; P = .015 for fellow eye), whereas no difference was evident between LMH and fellow eyes (P = .190). No changes were found in the DCP or the CC. No differences in vessel density of the three plexuses in the area outside the peri-FAZ were evident in any of the three groups. The FAZ in the SCP was larger in the LMH (0.39 ± 0.16 mm2) and in the fellow eye (0.39 ± 0.21 mm2) groups compared with controls (0.27 ± 0.07 mm2; P = .021 for LMH; P = .0043 for fellow eye), whereas it was similar between LMH and fellow eyes (P = .967).

CONCLUSIONS:

Degenerative-subtype LMH in the immediate proximity of the FAZ has a larger FAZ and higher vascular density in the SCP compared with healthy eyes. Unaffected fellow eyes also have increased vascular density compared with controls. Microvascular changes are evident in both LMH and unaffected fellow eyes and might play a role in disease pathogenesis.

[Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina. 2019;50:e112–e117.]

  • 1.Duker JS, Kaiser PK, Binder S, et al.The International Vitreomacular Traction Study Group classification of vitreomacular adhesion, traction, and macular hole. Ophthalmology. 2013; 120(12):2611–2619.10.1016/j.ophtha.2013.07.042

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 2.Takahashi H, Kishi S. Tomographic features of a lamellar macular hole formation and a lamellar hole that progressed to a full-thickness macular hole. Am J Ophthalmol. 2000; 130(5):677–679.10.1016/S0002-9394(00)00626-7

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 3.Govetto A, Dacquay Y, Farajzadeh M, et al.Lamellar macular hole: Two distinct clinical entities?Am J Ophthalmol. 2016; 164:99–109.10.1016/j.ajo.2016.02.008

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 4.Pang CE, Spaide RF, Freund KB. Comparing functional and morphologic characteristics of lamellar macular holes with and without lamellar hole-associated epiretinal proliferation. Retina. 2015; 35(4):720–726.10.1097/IAE.0000000000000390

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 5.Pang CE, Spaide RF, Freund KB. Epiretinal proliferation seen in association with lamellar macular holes: A distinct clinical entity. Retina. 2014; 34(8):1513–1523.10.1097/IAE.0000000000000163

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 6.Itoh Y, Levison AL, Kaiser PK, Srivastava SK, Singh RP, Ehlers JP. Prevalence and characteristics of hyporeflective preretinal tissue in vitreomacular interface disorders. Br J Ophthalmol. 2016; 100(3):399–404.10.1136/bjophthalmol-2015-306986

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 7.Pierro L, Iuliano L, Bandello F. OCT angiography features of a case of bilateral full-thickness macular hole at different stages. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina. 2016; 47(4):388–389.10.3928/23258160-20160324-16

    LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 8.Pierro L, Rabiolo A, Iuliano L, Gagliardi M, Panico D, Bandello F. Vascular density of retinal capillary plexuses in different subtypes of macular hole. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina. 2017; 48(8):648–654.10.3928/23258160-20170802-07

    LinkGoogle Scholar
  • 9.Nemiroff J, Kuehlewein L, Rahimy E, et al.Assessing deep retinal capillary ischemia in paracentral acute middle maculopathy by optical coherence tomography angiography. Am J Ophthalmol. 2016; 162:121–132.e1.10.1016/j.ajo.2015.10.026

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 10.Chidambara L, Gadde SG, Yadav NK, et al.Characteristics and quantification of vascular changes in macular telangiectasia type 2 on optical coherence tomography angiography. Br J Ophthalmol. 2016; 100(11):1482–1488.10.1136/bjophthalmol-2015-307941

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 11.Samara WA, Say EA, Khoo CT, et al.Correlation of foveal avascular zone size with foveal morphology in normal eyes using optical coherence tomography angiography. Retina. 2015; 35(11):2188–2195.10.1097/IAE.0000000000000847

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 12.Compera D, Entchev E, Haritoglou C, et al.Lamellar hole-associated epiretinal proliferation in comparison to epiretinal membranes of macular pseudoholes. Am J Ophthalmol. 2015; 160(2):373–384.e1.10.1016/j.ajo.2015.05.010

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 13.Compera D, Entchev E, Haritoglou C, et al.Correlative microscopy of lamellar hole-associated epiretinal proliferation. J Ophthalmol. 2015; 2015:450212.10.1155/2015/450212

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 14.Witkin AJ, Ko TH, Fujimoto JG, et al.Redefining lamellar holes and the vitreomacular interface: an ultrahigh-resolution optical coherence tomography study. Ophthalmology. 2006; 113(3):388–397.10.1016/j.ophtha.2005.10.047

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 15.Parolini B, Schumann RG, Cereda MG, Haritoglou C, Pertile G. Lamellar macular hole: A clinicopathologic correlation of surgically excised epiretinal membranes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011; 52(12):9074–9083.10.1167/iovs.11-8227

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 16.dell'Omo R, Virgili G, Rizzo S, et al.Role of lamellar hole-associated epiretinal proliferation in lamellar macular holes. Am J Ophthalmol. 2017; 175:16–29.10.1016/j.ajo.2016.11.007

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 17.Ko J, Kim GA, Lee SC, et al.Surgical outcomes of lamellar macular holes with and without lamellar hole-associated epiretinal proliferation. Acta Ophthalmol. 2017; 95(3):e221–e226.10.1111/aos.13245

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 18.Lai TT, Chen SN, Yang CM. Epiretinal proliferation in lamellar macular holes and full-thickness macular holes: Clinical and surgical findings. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2016; 254(4):629–638.10.1007/s00417-015-3133-9

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 19.Nava U, Cereda MG, Bottoni F, et al.Long-term follow-up of fellow eye in patients with lamellar macular hole. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2017; 255(8):1485–1492.10.1007/s00417-017-3652-7

    Crossref MedlineGoogle Scholar

We use cookies on this site to enhance your user experience. For a complete overview of all the cookies used, please see our privacy policy.

×